41. Dateline Vision Story New York Statutes civil Rights law, Article 4B, Sections 47 through 47c, 1986 ohio. Statute or law ohio Revised code, 1979, Sections 955.011 and http://www.msnbc.com/onair/nbc/dateline/guides/maptext.asp

State by State Access Laws for Guide Dog Users Please cursor past the links to page down for individual state information or use your search function. Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas ... Wyoming Alabama Statute or Law: Act 869, Alabama Statutes of 1975, Sections 21-7-1 through 21-7-10, Chapter 7 Alabama statutory law guarantees a blind person the legal right to be accompanied by a specially trained dog guide in all public accommodations and conveyances. No additional charge can be levied because of the presence of the dog, but the dog guide user is liable for any property damage attributable to the dog. Back to top Back to top Alaska Statute or Law: Alaska Statutes of 1988; Code of Civil Procedure Sections 09.65.150 and 11.76.130 The State of Alaska guarantees by statute the legal right of a blind person to be accompanied by a specially trained dog guide in a common carrier, place of public accommodation, or other place to which the public is invited. No charge can be levied because of the presence of the dog, but the dog guide user is liable for any property damage the dog might cause. Violation: Interference with the rights of a disabled person is a Class B misdemeanor.

42. The Ohio Lemon Law ohio Lemon law Free case review from Kahn Associates. dealer to comply with section 1345.72 of the Revised code, may bring a civil action in a court http://kahnandassociates.com/lemon_law/statutes.htm

Sections 1345.71 to 1345.77 of the Revised Code Section 1345.71 As used in sections 1345.71 to 1345.77 of the Revised Code: (A) "Consumer" means the purchaser, other than for purposes of resale, of a motor vehicle , any person to whom the motor vehicle is transferred during the duration of the express warranty that is applicable to the motor vehicle , and any other person who is entitled by the terms of the warranty to enforce the warranty. (B) "Manufacturer" and "distributor" have the same meanings as in section 4517.01 of the Revised Code, and manufacturer includes a remanufacturer as defined in that section. (C) "Express warranty" and "warranty" mean the written warranty of the manufacturer or distributor of a new motor vehicle concerning the condition and fitness for use of the vehicle , including any terms or conditions precedent to the enforcement of obligations under that warranty. (D) "Motor vehicle " means any passenger car or noncommercial motor vehicle as defined in section 4501.01 of the Revised Code, or those parts of any motor home, as defined in section 4501.01 of the Revised Code, that are not part of the permanently installed facilities for cold storage, cooking and consuming of food, and for sleeping, but does not mean any mobile home as defined in division (O) of section 4501.01 of the Revised Code, recreational vehicle as defined in division (Q) of that section, or manufactured home as defined in division (C)(4) of section 3781.06 of the Revised Code.

43. Effectiveness Of The Ohio Vehicle Action And Administrative License Suspension L and Implementation of ohio Vehicle Action law the Hamilton County Sheriff’s Department uses a civil code to deny the release of vehicles...... http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/people/injury/research/ohio/appendix_a.html

Home Contents Appendix A Description and Implementation of Ohio Vehicle Action Law The main body of this report has evaluated the impact of the Ohio Vehicle Action (VA) law on the recidivism of DWS and DUI offenders. This evaluation indicated that impounding and/or immobilizing the vehicle of such offenders reduces their DUI and DWS recidivism both during the period when the vehicle is held by the state and, to a lesser extent, following the return of the vehicle to its owner. The purpose of this appendix is to provide a more detailed description of the VA law and how it was applied in Hamilton and Franklin Counties. Appendix B includes forms developed by the immobilization coordinator in Franklin County used to coordinate with law enforcement. Appendix C includes court entry and other forms from Franklin County that are required for vehicle immobilization and forfeiture. Appendix D includes informational brochures used in Ohio to publicize the new DUI laws and a standard BMV form used by the police for ALS and VA actions which also served to inform offenders about the risk of immobilization. Appendix E contains a copy of a poster and leaflet about the law which were used in Franklin County. THE OHIO VEHICLE ACTION LAW For several years, an Ohio law permitted the courts to impose a vehicle immobilization penalty for motorists caught driving while suspended (DWS) for driving under the influence (DUI). This penalty was only used in a few smaller Ohio counties. In September 1993, the law was changed to include immobilization for second and subsequent offenses of DUI and certain DWS offenses (see Table A-1). The law requires the immediate impoundment of the vehicle upon arrest in these cases until the courts can order the immobilization and license plate impoundment upon conviction. The length of the immobilization period is 30 days for a first DWS, and 60 days for a second DWS, and 90 days for a second and 180 days for a third DUI offense within 5 years.

44. WILLIAM M. HILTON Certified Family Law Specialist Box 269, Santa This section of the decision discusses the application of civil code Section FN 5, New Jersey, FN 6 and ohio FN 7, then civil code Section 5172 http://www.hiltonhouse.com/articles/13jul90_dca.txt

WILLIAM M. HILTON Certified Family Law Specialist Box 269, Santa Clara, California 95052 (408) 246-8511 FAX (408) 246-8511 13 Jul 1990 Court of Appeal First District 350 McAllister Street, Room 4154 San Francisco, California 94102 re: Cully v Cully (Arnold) 1st Appellate District, Division Five No. A046724 San Francisco Superior Court No. 894341 Pursuant to California Rules of Court (CRC) Rule 978(a), it is respectfully requested that the decision of the Court filed on 11 Jul 1990 be certified for publication. This request is based upon the criteria set forth in CRC Rule 976(b)(2) [FN 1] and/or Rule 976(b)(3) [FN 2] as more specifically set forth below. Preliminarily it is to be noted that this decision reversed an order of the trial Court, indicating that, as a minimum, there is a misunderstanding of the application of the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act (UCCJA) regarding international cases. The Court, in its decision, stated as follows: [FN 3] Lastly, in certain cases, a court may assume jurisdiction under the UCCJA when no other state has jurisdiction under any of the preceding tests or another state has declined to exercise jurisdiction on the ground that California is the more appropriate forum and it is in the child's best interests that a California court assume jurisdiction. (Sec. 5152, (l)(d).) The trial court inferentially alluded to this section as a potential reason for exercising jurisdiction when it noted: "Neither any province of Canada nor any other state of the United States has exercised jurisdiction in this matter, . . ." However, it is clear by the very language of this section that its requirements are not met. As indicated previously, Canada would have home state jurisdiction and significant contact jurisdiction, and Canada has not declined exercise of its jurisdiction. Without either of these prerequisites, the court may not reach any equitable concerns about the "best interests of the child." This section of the decision discusses the application of Civil Code Section 5152(1)(d): (i) It appears that no other state would have jurisdiction under prerequisites substantially in accordance with paragraphs (a), (b), (c), or another state has declined to exercise jurisdiction on the ground that this state is the more appropriate forum to determine the custody of the child, and (ii) it is in the best interest of the child that this court assume jurisdiction. It is well understood that any one section of the UCCJA is to be interpreted in accord with the entire act, including Civil Code Section 5172 (With the Commissioner's Comments): The general policies of this title extend to the international area. The provisions of this title relating to the recognition and enforcement of custody decrees of other states apply to custody decrees and decrees involving legal institutions similar in nature to custody rendered by appropriate authorities of other nations if reasonable notice and opportunity to be heard were given to all affected persons. Commissioners' Comments Not all of the provisions of the Act lend themselves to direct application in international custody disputes; but the basic policies of avoiding jurisdictional conflict and multiple litigation are as strong if not stronger when children are moved back and forth from one country to another by feuding relatives. Compare Application of Lang, 9 App.Div.2d 401, 193 N.Y.S.2d 763 (1959) and Swindle v. Bradley, 240 Ark.903, 403 S.W.2d 63 (1966). The first sentence makes the general policies of the Act applicable to international cases. This means that the substance of section 1 (CC 5150) and the principles underlying provisions like sections 6 (CC5155), 7 (CC5156), 8 (CC5157), and 14(a) (CC 5163[1]), are to be followed when some of the persons involved are in a foreign country or a foreign custody proceeding is pending. The second sentence declares that custody decrees rendered in other nations by appropriate authorities (which may be judicial or administrative tribunals) are recognized and enforced in this country. The only prerequisite is that reasonable notice and opportunity to be heard was given to the persons affected. It is also to be understood that the foreign tribunal had jurisdiction under is own law rather than under section 3 (CC 5152) of this Act. Compare Restatement of the Law Second, Conflict of Laws, Proposed Official Draft, sections 10, 92, 98, and 109(2) (1967). Compare also Goodrich Conflict of Laws 390-93 (4th ed., Scoles, 1964). [FN 4] In the Court's decision it held that the trial Court's implied finding that there was no other forum available was improper as there was another forum available: Canada. This is clearly within the intent of the UCCJA, particularly Civil Code Section 5150: General Purpose of Title. The Court's ruling that Canada is to be treated as a "state" within the meaning of the UCCJA " . . . [R]esolves or creates an apparent conflict in the law . . . " as Civil Code Section 5151(10) defines "State" as any " . . . state, territory, or possession of the United State, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and the District of Columbia." If this section is taken literally, as has been done in New York, [FN 5], New Jersey, [FN 6] and Ohio [FN 7], then Civil Code Section 5172 would have little or no effect when there was an issue involving California and a foreign nation. The limiting of the definition of "state" to that of Civil Code 5151(10) would defeat one of the principle purposes of the UCCJA as set forth in Civil Code Section 5150(b): "Promote cooperation with the courts of the states to the end that a custody decree is rendered in that state which can best decide the case in the interest of the child." With the recent implementation of The Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, done at the Hague on 25 Oct 1980 [FN 8] the concept that child custody matters are best resolved in the place with the most significant contacts was given a new impetus. This Court's finding that Canada is a "state" within the meaning of the UCCJA is in accord with this trend and " . . . [I]nvolves a legal issue of continuing public interest . . ." For the reasons given, its is respectfully requested that the court review the decision of 11 Jul 1990 and certify it for publication. Very Respectfully /S/ Wm. M. Hilton William M. Hilton, CFLS WMH:dah cc: Elizabeth Benford, Esq., Hon. Ina Levin Gyemant FOOTNOTES - 1 Rule 976b(2): [R]esolves or creates an apparent conflict in the law; 2 Rule 976b(3): [I]nvolves a legal issue of continuing public interest; 3 Slip Opinion, Page 5, Lines 20 through 27; Page 6, Lines 01 through 09 4 "Reports of commissions which have proposed statues that are subsequently adopted are entitled to substantial weight in construing the statutes....This is particularly true where the statute proposed by the commission is adopted by the Legislature without any change whatsoever and where the commission's comment is brief, because in such a situation there is ordinarily strong reason to believe that the legislators' votes were based in large measure upon the explanation of the commission proposing the bill." Miller v Superior Court(1979) 22 Cal.3d 923, 943, 151 Cal.Rptr.6, 18 5 Massey v Massey (App.Div. 1982) 452 N.Y.S.2d 101, 102.)]; Klien v Klien (Sup. 1988) 533 N.Y.S.2d 211, 214; Lotte U v Leo U (Fam.Ct.1985) 491 N.Y.S.2d 581, 582 6 Schmidt v Schmidt (N.J.Super.A.D. 1988) 227 N.J. Super., 528 [548 A.2d 195, 198] 7 Minton v McManus(Ohio App.1983) 9 Ohio App.3d 165, 458 N.E.2d 1292, 1294 8 01 Jul 1988 is the effective date for the United States

45. Dog Bite Law Center: Ohio Dog Bite Law CAFood code § 31501 et seq; civil code § § 3342, 3342.5 Commonlaw rule. 2 OJI 217.07. Complaint for dog bite. 1 ohio Civ. Prac. § § 2.27, 19.09 http://www.dogbitelawcenter.com/pages/Ohiodogbitelaw.cfm

Welcome Basic Dog Bite Law Elements of a Dog Bite Claim Provocation Defense ... Site Map Ohio TITLE IX [9] AGRICULTURE ANIMALS FENCES CHAPTER 955: DOGS [PROHIBITIONS] ORC Ann. 955.28 (Anderson 2002) 955.28 Dog may be killed for certain acts; owner liable for damages. (A) Subject to divisions (A)(2) and (3) of section 955.261 [ 955.26.1] of the Revised Code , a dog that is chasing or approaching in a menacing fashion or apparent attitude of attack, that attempts to bite or otherwise endanger, or that kills or injures a person or a dog that chases, injures, or kills livestock, poultry, other domestic animal, or other animal, that is the property of another person, except a cat or another dog, can be killed at the time of that chasing, approaching, attempt, killing, or injury. If, in attempting to kill such a dog, a person wounds it, he is not liable to prosecution under the penal laws which punish cruelty to animals. (B) The owner, keeper, or harborer of a dog is liable in damages for any injury, death, or loss to person or property that is caused by the dog, unless the injury, death, or loss was caused to the person or property of an individual who, at the time, was committing or attempting to commit a trespass or other criminal offense on the property of the owner, keeper, or harborer, or was committing or attempting to commit a criminal offense against any person, or was teasing, tormenting, or abusing the dog on the owner's, keeper's, or harborer's property. HISTORY: : RS § § 4212-1, 4212-2; 93 v 128, 129; 94 v 118, § §

46. BGSU ::Risk Management::Risk Management ohio law (ohio Revised code, Section 9.86) does grant a qualified, to State employees for civil lawsuits that arise under the laws of ohio but that http://www.bgsu.edu/offices/riskmgmt/page10692.html

Quick Links... HOT LINKS About BGSU BGSU Home Contact Us Events News SEARCH Search People Search Web ACADEMICS Academic Calendar Academic Enhancement Catalog-Graduate Catalog-Undergraduate College - Firelands

47. Ohio Medical Malpractice Summary A civil action against the state or its political subdivisions must be brought code Ann. § 2744.05 (BanksBaldwin Supp. 2002). Arbitration. ohio law http://www.mcandl.com/ohio.html

OHIO Statutes of Limitations Statutory Cap on Attorneys' Fees Contributory or Comparative Negligence Periodic Payments ... Arbitration In 1996, Ohio adopted a comprehensive tort reform act that repealed, amended, or added more than 100 sections of the Ohio Revised Code, including many relevant to medical malpractice. Am. Sub. H.B. 350, 121st Leg. (1996). The Ohio Supreme Court held this act to be unconstitutional in its entirety in State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. Sheward , 86 Ohio St. 3d 451, 715 N.E.2d 1062 (1999). (We have published elsewhere on this web site a memorandum discussing the implications of Sheward .) To resolve the ambiguity created by a mass of invalid legislation, the General Assembly passed Sub. S.B. 108, 124th Leg. (2001), which restores (with a few amendments) the law as it existed before Am. Sub. H.B. 350. Statutes of Limitations Every action for medical malpractice must be brought within one year after the cause of action accrues. Ohio Rev. Code Ann. § 2305.11(B)(1) (Banks-Baldwin Supp. 2002). A cause of action for medical malpractice accrues when the claimant discovers or, in the exercise of reasonable care and diligence, should have discovered the resulting injury, or when the physician-patient relationship for that condition terminates, whichever occurs later. Frysinger v. Leech

48. Lawarchive - CIVIL RIGHTS: A NEW PUBLIC ACCOMMODATIONS LAW FOR OHIO civil RIGHTS A NEW PUBLIC ACCOMMODATIONS law FOR ohio K law K law (General). ID code, 541. Deposited By, Roycroft, Laura http://eprints.law.duke.edu/archive/00000541/

Duke Law Eprints CIVIL RIGHTS: A NEW PUBLIC ACCOMMODATIONS LAW FOR OHIO Van Alstyne, William W. (1961) CIVIL RIGHTS: A NEW PUBLIC ACCOMMODATIONS LAW FOR OHIO. Ohio State Law Journal Full text available as: PDF - Requires Adobe Acrobat Reader or other PDF viewer. Abstract For the first time in the twentieth century, the Ohio Legislature has moved forcefully to protect the right of access to places of public accommodation from racial discrimination. EPrint Type: Journal (Paginated) Subjects: K Law K Law (General) ID Code: Deposited By: Roycroft, Laura Deposited On: 26 June 2003 Site Administrator: ken@law.duke.edu Duke University About Duke Law Admissions ... News + Events

49. LII: State Statutes By Topic Business and Professions code; civil code; civil Procedure; Commercial law; Corporations; Corrections; Courts and Court Officers; Criminal code http://straylight.law.cornell.edu/topics/state_statutes.html

Law about... collection home tell me more donate Topical Index: State Statutes on the Internet Most but not all state statutes on the Internet are organized along lines fitting the following topical breakdown. [For a full listing of State Statutes on the Net, click here Agriculture Alcoholic Beverages Alternative Dispute Resolution ... Water Code State Statutes on the Internet by Topic Agriculture Alabama- Title 2 Alaska- Title 3 Arizona- Title 3 Arkansas- Title 2 ... Wyoming- Title 11 Alcoholic Beverages Alabama- Title 28 Alaska- Title 4 Arizona- Title 4 Arkansas- Title 3 ... Wyoming- Title 12 Alternative Dispute Resolution Alabama- Title 6, Chapter 6 Alaska Arizona- Title 12, Article 2 Arkansas- Title 16, Subtitle1- 7 California (see Title 2, Division 3, Part 1, Chapter 4.5, Article 5) Colorado- Title 13, Article 22, Part 2 ... South Carolina- Title 15, Chapter 48 South Dakota Tennessee- Title 29, Chapter 5 Texas (see Government Code, Title 10, Subtitle A, 2008) Utah- Title 58, Chapter 39a Vermont- Title 12, Chapter 192 ... Wisconsin- Chapter 802-12 PDF Wyoming- Title 1, Chapter 36

50. Welcome To The Legal Information Institute 17 Martin Luther King holiday see LII s law about civil Rights; Jan. 13 - US District Court Judge, Uniform code of Military Justice; LII law about. http://straylight.law.cornell.edu/

site awards tell me more our supporters donate ... About the LII Spotlight New from the LII Supreme Court oral argument previews from liibulletin for Schaffer v. Weast Gonzales v. Oregon IBP v. Alvarez , and Wagnon v. Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation . (Cornell Chronicle article on liibulletin.) Introduction to Basic Legal Citation Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure available online and for fulltext download purchases LII edition of the Congressional Research Service's Annotated Constitution Search opinions of U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeal: /usca/search/ Please donate The Legal Information Institute needs your support for this free service. Law Events in the News September 21 - Cornell University joins with Columbia, Harvard, NYU, Penn, U Chicago, and Yale in filing an amicus brief (PDF) with the Supreme Court in the /FAIR/ case challenging the constitutionality of the Solomon Amendment on military recruitment on college campuses. Oral argument will be held on December 6, 2005. September 3 - death of U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist. See

51. Lemon Laws - MegaLaw.com California Lemon law California civil code § 1793.22; Colorado Lemon law Texas Lemon law - Texas Motor Vehicle Commission code Article 4413(36) http://www.megalaw.com/top/lemon.php

MegaLaw.com MegaLawBooks.com MegaDepos.com MegaLaw ... Contact Us Official Case Law: Sponsored links: Medical Malpractice MegaLaw partners: LEMON LAWS Home Legal Research Topic Index > Lemon Laws See also MegaLaw.com Consumer Law Page Click here a CarFax Vehicle Lemon Check Be prepared to enter your Vehicle Identification Number for a car history report from CarFax. Federal Lemon Laws Magnuson-Moss Warranty - Federal Trade Commission Improvement Act Also codified in part in 15 U.S.C. Chapter 2 Summary of the Act from the Consumer Law Center State Lemon Laws Alabama Lemon Law Alaska Lemon Law Arkansas Lemon Law Arizona Lemon Law ... Colorado Lemon Law - Colorado Statutes 42-10-101 - 42-10-107 Connecticut Lemon Law - New Car - Title 42, Chapter 743b Connecticut Lemon Law - Used Car - Title 42, Chapter 743f Delaware Lemon Law Florida Lemon Law - Florida Statutes Chapter 681 Georgia Lemon Law - Georgia Code 10-1-780 Hawaii Lemon Law - Hawaii Revised Statutes, Chapter 4811 Iowa Lemon Law - Iowa Statutes Chapter 322G.1-15 Idaho Lemon Law Illinois Lemon Law - Illinois Revised Statutes 815.380

52. Ohio Ethics Law ohio s Ethics law Advice Education Public Information Financial Disclosure Investigation THE ohio ETHICS law CHAPTER 102. OF THE REVISED code http://ethics.ohio.gov/ethicslawrevisedcode.html

About the Commission Ohio's Ethics Law Advice Financial Disclosure ... Related Links Ohio Ethics Law Click here to view PDF version Click here to link to the Joint Legislative Ethics Committee's summary of the post employment disclosure requirements, effective May 18, 2005. THE OHIO ETHICS LAW: CHAPTER 102. OF THE REVISED CODE Section 102.01 As used in this chapter: (A) "Compensation" means money, thing of value, or financial benefit. "Compensation" does not include reimbursement for actual and necessary expenses incurred in the performance of official duties. (B) "Public official or employee" means any person who is elected or appointed to an office or is an employee of any public agency. "Public official or employee" does not include a person elected or appointed to the office of precinct, ward, or district committee member under section 3517.03 of the Revised Code, any presidential elector, or any delegate to a national convention. "Public official or employee" does not include a person who is a teacher, instructor, professor, or other kind of educator whose position does not involve the performance of, or authority to perform, administrative or supervisory functions. (C) "Public agency" means the general assembly, all courts, any department, division, institution, board, commission, authority, bureau or other instrumentality of the state, a county, city, village, or township, the five state retirement systems, or any other governmental entity. "Public agency" does not include a department, division, institution, board, commission, authority, or other instrumentality of the state or a county, municipal corporation, township, or other governmental entity that functions exclusively for cultural, educational, historical, humanitarian, advisory, or research purposes; does not expend more than ten thousand dollars per calendar year, excluding salaries and wages of employees; and whose members are uncompensated.

53. Advisory Opinion 75-024 ohio s Ethics law Advice Education Public Information Secretary of State, ohio Revised code, Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline http://ethics.ohio.gov/opinions/75-024.html

About the Commission Ohio's Ethics Law Advice Financial Disclosure ... Click here to view PDF version Advisory Opinion No. 75-024 August 19, 1975 Syllabus by the Ohio Ethics Commission: 1) A member of a municipal corporation's civil service commission, who receives less than $1000 per year for serving on the commission is not a "public official or employee" as that phrase is used in Chapter 102 of the Revised Code. 2) The prohibitions of Section 102.03 (D) of the Revised Code do not apply to a chairman of a municipal corporation's civil service commission who receives less than $1000 per year for serving on the commission. Your request for an advisory opinion asks whether an individual who has a contract with a city to provide food services for city prisoners, may serve in the capacity of chairman of the municipal corporation's civil service commission. The request states that the chairman of a municipal corporation's civil service commission, is responsible for the administration of testing and recommending of municipal civil service appointments, promotions and advancements, including policemen. The chairman of the commission contracts in a private capacity with the city to provide food services for the city jail. The contract was obtained on a bid basis and the contract price is entirely dependent upon the number of prisoners incarcerated in the jail.

54. Anderson's 2005 Ohio Civil Laws And Rules Handbook - LexisNexis(R) Bookstore With Anderson’s ohio civil Laws and Rules Handbook you have the statutes and rules that Designed and priced for personal use, with Anderson’s ohio code http://bookstore.lexis.com/bookstore/catalog?action=product&prod_id=50212&cat_id

55. Laws, Acts, And Legislation Enrolled bills are the final version passed by the ohio General Assembly and presented under any other federal, state, or local criminal or civil law; http://www.legislature.state.oh.us/bills.cfm?ID=125_HB_383

56. Laws, Acts, And Legislation Enrolled bills are the final version passed by the ohio General Assembly and presented To enact section 2305.401 of the Revised code as a general law to http://www.legislature.state.oh.us/bills.cfm?ID=124_HB_192

57. CD ROM Databases - Supreme Court Of Ohio ohio Revised code Annotated / ohio Administrative code, Approved Edition Maryland Practice code of civil Procedure Massachusetts, Annotated Laws of http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/LawLibrary/cdrom/

Supreme Court of Ohio Law Library CD-ROM and On-line Databases Available in the Library Available on all workstations: Code of Federal Regulations (West) Congressional Record On-line Federal Reporter (West) Federal Register On-line Federal Supplement (West) Infotrac On-line Ohio Citations: with Ohio Unreported Appellate Citations (Shepard's) Ohio Forms on Disc (Anderson) Ohio Jurisprudence 3d (West) Ohio Law On-line (Anderson) Ohio Jury Instructions (Anderson) Ohio Reports (West) Ohio Revised Code Annotated / Ohio Administrative Code, Approved Edition (West/ Banks Baldwin) Supreme Court Reporter (West) United States Code Annotated (West) Available on Request on all workstations: a b c d ... w A ABA Tax Lawyer Index Age Discrimination Litigation Alabama Index Arizona Index Arkansas Model Jury Instructions - Civil 4th Edition Forms on Disc Art Law Handbook B Baldwin's Ohio Practice, Business Organizations British Company Law Library C California Family Law Database Chief Counsel Advice China Laws for Foreign Business Clerk's Manual Effectively Representing Your Client before the "New" IRS Law of Trusts and Trustees (Bogert) Competition Law of Canada Appendices Computer Software Agreements Forms Connecticut Practice Series Criminal Jury Instructions 3rd Edition Construction Industry Formbook Consumer Law in a Box 2000 Contemporary Corporation Forms on CD-ROM Corporate Counsel's Guide to Employment Contracts Corporate Counsel's Guide to Software Transactions

58. The Ohio Association Of County Behavioral Health Authorities ANDERSON PUBLISHING ohio ADMINISTRATIVE AND REVISED code Information exchanges with law enforcement agencies; reports to child protective agencies. http://www.oacbha.org/Ohio_Behavioral_Health_Laws.htm

33 North High Street, Suite 500, Columbus, Ohio 43215 (614) 224-1111 (614) 224-2642 fax September is Recovery Month! Join the Recovery Rally on Sept. 21st at 11:30 Ohio Statehouse West Lawn. The Ohio Association of County Behavioral Health Authorities has compiled the following index to assist you in locating and accessing sections of the Ohio Revised Code and the Ohio Administrative Code that pertain to Ohio's Behavioral Health System. To view the text of the following chapters, click on the link below and proceed to the appropriate sections as indicated below: ANDERSON PUBLISHING OHIO ADMINISTRATIVE AND REVISED CODE Ohio Revised Code Index Ohio Administrative Code Index OHIO REVISED CODE TITLE 3 CHAPTER 340: ALCOHOL, DRUG ADDICTION, AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES

59. Research Guide 29: Ohio Resources This is especially true in the building code, but the ohio Basic Building CDROM Anderson s ohio law and West s ohio law on lawDesk contain specific http://www.clelaw.lib.oh.us/Public/Misc/REGUIDES/guide29.html

RESEARCH GUIDE SERIES: RESEARCH GUIDE NO. 29 Cleveland Law Library Members have access to the most currently available texts, periodicals, case law and online resources for use in researching Ohio law. This Research Guide will cover the major sources of Ohio Materials Available In The Law Library. BILLS/PENDING LEGISLATION Current Status: Ohio General Assembly Online: www.legislature.state.oh.us/search.cfm Ohio Capitol Connection : Staff use only. Lexis : OHIO Library; OHTRCK file Westlaw : OH-BILLTRK Database Ohio Legislative Hotline Old Bills, not Enacted: Ohio General Assembly Online : 1997 to current. Ohio Capitol Connection : Staff use only. 1989 - current. Enacted Laws: Ohio General Assembly Online: www.legislature.state.oh.us/search.cfm : 1997 to current. Ohio Capitol Connection : Staff use only. 1989 - current. Laws of Ohio: KFO25.A3 - State published (Official) session laws, usually a few years behind Baldwin's Ohio Legislative Service: KFO15.B34 - Published monthly. 1974 to current. On Westlaw: OH-LEGIS and OH-LEGIS-OLD. 1988 to current Page's Ohio Revised Code Bulletin: KFO30 1953 P3 - Published monthly Ohio Advanced Legislative Service: Lexis OHALS file. 1991 to current session

60. Landlord & Tenant Law The CA civil code section 1950.5 governs such deposits click here to see civil code 1950.5 Recent US Supreme Court Decisions on Landlord Tenant law http://www.calawnet.com/tenancy.html

CALawNET.com's Landlord - Tenant Law Page CALawNet's home - We have received a number of inquiries about security and cleaning deposits. The CA Civil Code section 1950.5 governs such deposits - click here to see Civil Code 1950.5 CA Dept. of Consumer Affairs Handbook on Rental Issues for Landlords and Tenants Security Deposits Free Landlord/Tenant Info from Nolo Press ... Eviction Notices in CA Rental Cases - Landlord.com We will soon be adding information about evictions, unlawful detainers, 3 and 30 Notices to Vacate, etc. For now you can see the Judicial Council Forms - click here Landlord - tenant disputes are among the most common disputes people write us about. We always recommend learning what your rights and responsibilities are before you engage in a law suit and whenever possible mediate a dispute, if you can [see Marin Law.Net's Mediation Pages ]. In the case of landlord - tenant disputes the laws generally provide very strict time frames within which you must act in order to protect and enforce your rights, as a landlord or a tenant. You need to contact an attorney regarding any potential claims you may feel that you have or any potential defenses to a claim against you. You can always click here to email us your questions CALawNet's Landlord - Tenant Law Quick Links Recent US Supreme Court Decisions on Landlord Tenant Law Recent Circuit Court of Appeals Landlord Tenant Law Decisions US Civil Rights Act of 1866 (42 USC 1982) Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS ... Civil Rights Research Site from Cornell University

A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P  Q  R  S  T  U  V  W  X  Y  Z

Page 3     41-60 of 97    Back | 1  | 2  | 3  | 4  | 5  | Next 20