placeAd(1,'slate.news/slate') Print E-mail Discuss Newsletters ... About Us Search Slate AdvancedàSearch placeAd(3,'slate.homepage/slate') placeAd(6,'slate.homepage/slate'); fraywatch What's happening in our readers' forum. Hawks and Doves "Fat chicks" and war opponents on the Fray. Compiled by Kevin Arnovitz Updated Friday, Aug. 5, 2005, at 8:19 AM PT Senor Bomb Doodahman 's Dan Senor Boycott, which began here , has officially come to a close. For his part, dood explains The motive for the boycott is not that the positions of known liars and frauds are aired. Those positions rise or fall on their own merits and the more they are discussed, the clearer we can see them for what they are⦠Haven't these people had a more than ample opportunity to spread disinformation, change their stories, hide important information and restrict the debate into an unrealistic and dishonest frame? ⦠Why the hell do we need to tap Dan Senor into the debate? Surely somebody who is not tainted with actual involvement in this crime would have done a much better job, even if only because they are not personally tainted with it. I have never had a problem with debating the war issue, even though the efforts of the media, including | |
|