61. ABA Public Education Supreme Court Preview March 2003 Cases At A In this case, the supreme court must decide whether the statute violates The decision could affect numerous state and federal laws eliminating and http://www.abanet.org/publiced/preview/glances/march03.html

You currently do not have JavaScript enabled in your web browser. The ABA website relies on JavaScript for display purposes. To fully experience the ABA site, please enable javascript. Cases at a Glance Cases Argued March 2003 Monday, March 24 JUDICIAL REVIEW Does the Participation of a Non-Article III Judge Render a Circuit Court Panel's Judgment Invalid? Nguyen v. United States and Phan v. United States Docket Nos. 01-10873 and 02-5034 From: The Ninth Circuit Case at a Glance This case began as a drug case, but ended up presenting the issue of whether a judgment of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is invalid because the panel of judges deciding the case included a non-Article III judge. Previewed by Jay E. Grenig, a professor of law at Marquette University Law School in Milwaukee, Wisc. Supreme Court Decision: Click to read decision DEATH PENALTY When Can Defense Counsel's Decision Not To Present Mitigating Evidence Be Challenged as Ineffective Assistance? Wiggins v. Smith et al.

62. ABA Public Education Supreme Court Preview December 2000 Cases At The supreme court has established that licensing laws must contain certain This lawsuit was brought under a federal statute against two radio stations http://www.abanet.org/publiced/preview/glances/dec_00.html

You currently do not have JavaScript enabled in your web browser. The ABA website relies on JavaScript for display purposes. To fully experience the ABA site, please enable javascript. Cases at a Glance Cases Argued December 2000 Monday, November 27 VOTING RIGHTS Was race the "predominant" factor in North Carolina's redistricting plan? Hunt v. Cromartie and Smallwood v. Cromartie Docket Nos. 99-1864 and 99-1865 From: The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina Case at a Glance In a series of (often 5-4) decisions, the Supreme Court has ruled that creating legislative districts with the express purpose of ensuring minority dominance goes beyond the beneficial purposes of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and violates the Fourteenth Amendment. Now, for the fourth time in eight years, the Court will examine the constitutionality of District 12 in North Carolina. Previewed by David L. Hudson Jr., a staff attorney with the First Amendment Center at Vanderbilt University in Nashville, Tenn., and a contributor to the ABA Journal Supreme Court Decision: Click to read decision CRIMINAL PROCEDURE What constitutes ineffective assistance of counsel at sentencing?

63. Reno V. ACLU Decision (June 26, 1997) Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of decisions, supreme court of the Grace, 461 US 171, 180–183 (1983) (invalidating federal statute banning http://www2.epic.org/cda/cda_decision.html

Slip Opinion: 521 U.S.) NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. 200 U. S. 321, 337. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Jump to Majority Opinion Jump to Concurring/Dissenting Opinion RENO, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, et al. v. AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION et al. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Syllabus Held: (a) Although the CDA's vagueness is relevant to the First Amendment overbreadth inquiry, the judgment should be affirmed without reaching the Fifth Amendment issue. P. 17. Ginsberg v. New York, 390 U. S. 629; FCC v. Pacifica Foundation, 438 U. S. 726; and Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc., e.g., Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. FCC, e.g., Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v.

64. Tennessee Courts Law Libraries The primary responsibility of the Tennessee supreme court Libraries is to support the research Real Estate Law Library; Tennessee decisions statutes http://www.tsc.state.tn.us/geninfo/library/libraries.htm

Appellate Courts Appellate Court Clerk Appellate Dockets Trial Court Judges ... Videos Tennessee Supreme Court Libraries Knoxville - Eastern Division 505 W. Main Street, Suite 200 Knoxville, TN 37902 Phone: (865) 594-6128 Hours: 8:00AM-4:30PM. M-F Susan Delp: Librarian Nashville - Middle Division th Avenue North Supreme Court Building Nashville, TN 37219 Phone: (615) 741-2016 Fax: (615) 741-7186 Hours: 8:00AM-4:30PM. M-F Mary Miles Prince: Law Library Coordinator Stephen Jackson: Librarian Jackson- Western Division 6 Highway 45 Bypass Jackson, TN 38301 Phone: (901) 423-5849 Fax: (901) 423-6468 Hours: 8:00AM-4:30PM. M-F Debbie Durham: Librarian Tammye Droke: Assist. Librarian Go to the Tennessee Law Library Catalogue Library Policies The library is open to the general public. Library materials do not circulate and must be used on the premises. Visitors are expected to reshelve their own books before leaving. The use of cell phones, food and drink, or tobacco products are prohibited in the library. Staff are not permitted to do legal research for, or offer legal advice to, library visitors.

65. Substantive Law On The Web Maine supreme Judicial court Follow the directions to Law court Opinions. federal District court decisions (Subscription $49 for software and http://www.macattorney.com/law.html

This page provides the quickest and most comprehensive means of researching state and federal law on the World Wide Web. Presented by Randy B. Singer Attorney at Law It would be very convenient if all state and federal codes, statutes, and caselaw were available on the World Wide Web. This would give lay people easy access to the laws that they must follow and it would allow attorneys to do legal research without having to leave their office to go to a law library, or pay for expensive collections of casebooks. Unfortunately, economic realities dictate that we may never see all of the substantive law of all the states on the Web. Several states receive quite a bit of income by selling the exclusive rights to publish that state's caselaw. In addition, it is quite expensive to publish and maintain a web site, and money for such a project is not available in all states. Caselaw on the Web ideally would include decisions from at least the last 30 years, a sophistocated search engine for locating relevant law, case summaries, headnotes, etc. Providing all of these on a Web site would be very expensive. Given the above, it is impressive how much substantive law

66. Ben's Guide (9-12): Branches Of Government -- Judicial Branch -- The Supreme Cou its decisions can be changed only by another supreme court decision or by a The supreme court’s interpretations of federal law and the Constitution http://bensguide.gpo.gov/9-12/government/national/scourt.html

The Supreme Court The Constitution established the Supreme Court as the highest court in the United States. The authority of the Court originates from Article III of the U.S. Constitution and its jurisdiction is set out by statute in Title 28 of the U.S. Code One of the Supreme Court’s most important responsibilities is to decide cases that raise questions of constitutional interpretation. The Court decides if a law or government action violates the Constitution. This is known as judicial review and enables the Court to invalidate both federal and state laws when they conflict with the Constitution. Since the Supreme Court stands as the ultimate authority in constitutional interpretation, its decisions can be changed only by another Supreme Court decision or by a constitutional amendment. Judicial review puts the Supreme Court in a pivotal role in the American political system, making it the referee in disputes among various branches of the Federal, as well as state governments, and as the ultimate authority for many of the most important issues in the country. For example, in 1954, the Court banned racial segregation in public schools in Brown v.

67. American School Board Journal: November 2002 School Law Ultimately, the supreme court s decision raises important questions about Like many federal statutes, FERPA uses federal spending authority to assert http://www.asbj.com/2002/11/1102schoollaw.html

Sign up for our weekly e-mail newsletter November 2002: Vol. 189, No. 11 Cover Story Research School Law Your Turn ... In Our Print Edition The Family Educational and Privacy Act (FERPA) made waves when Congress passed it in 1974 because the law appeared to give powerful rights to students and parents over access to student records. But in an important decision this past June, Gonzaga University v. Doe , the U.S. Supreme Court concluded that this is not necessarily the case. The court's ruling, which states that FERPA does not actually create new federal rights for students and parents, does not solely address the technical legal question about the meaning of the term "rights." It also has practical consequences: If FERPA does not create rights for students and parents, then individual students and parents cannot sue schools to recover damages for violations of the law. Ultimately, the Supreme Court's decision raises important questions about how to enforce FERPA effectively. Although the case involved a dispute between a university and a former university student, it applies equally to FERPA cases involving public school districts and their students and parents.

68. The Consumer Law Page: Resources: Statutes, Codes, Rules, And Regulations statutes, Codes, Rules and Regulations. Administrative Law decisions of the US supreme court http//www.law.cornell.edu/syllabi?administrative http://consumerlawpage.com/resource/statutes.shtml

GET HELP Free Consultation ZYPREXA SETTLEMENT 690 Million Dollar Settlement for Zyprexa users. If you have had Zyprexa side effects , contact our Zyprexa lawyers BEXTRA RECALL Bextra Has Been Recalled - Learn What to Do If You Have Been Injured by Bextra VIOXX What Should I Do If I Have Taken Vioxx? See Also Vioxx News PROTECT YOURSELF Accident First Aid Preserving Evidence Before Hiring a Lawyer Hiring the "Right Lawyer" ... California's two year statute IMPORTANT INFORMATION California Injury Law Insurance Company Abuse SERIOUS INJURIES Brain Injury Burns DEFECTIVE PRODUCTS Air Crash Gas Tanks SUV Rollover Tire Defects ... Secret Defects TOXIC CHEMICALS Cancer/Electronics Industry Cancer/Solvents Proving Toxic Torts Environmental Pollution ... Cancer/Fiberglass CHILDREN Birth Defects in Children of Workers Exposed to Chemicals Childhood Seizures/Asthma Child Molestation Child Adoption Fraud ... In Utero Workplace Injuries Please BOOKMARK this site for future reference and be sure to visit our articles resources and brochure pages.

69. The Marriage Law Project At The Catholic University Of America There are however, federal statutes which rely on marital status to determine federal supreme court Marriage Cases. Although state law generally governs http://marriagelaw.cua.edu/Law/states/fed/fed.cfm

HOME CURRENT NEWS RELIGIOUS COMMUNITIES Last Updated: 06.21.2005 U.S. Marriage Law Expert Witness Resources Counsel United States Federal Law Introduction Marriage laws in the United States are almost exclusively governed by state law. There are however, federal statutes which rely on marital status to determine federal rights and benefits, so the definition of marriage is important to federal law. In addition, the U.S. Constitution's Supremacy Clause ensures that the U.S. Supreme Court can review the constitutionality of laws relating to marriage. Federal Defense of Marriage Act (1996) Section 1. Section 2. DOMA analysis GAO report on the Benefits of Marriage Federal Marriage Amendment Marriage in the United States shall consist only of the union of a man and a woman. Neither this constitution or the constitution of any state, nor state or federal law, shall be construed to require that marital status or the legal incidents thereof be conferred upon unmarried couples or groups. Information and analysis Supreme Court Marriage Cases Although state law generally governs marriages, there have been some important U.S. Supreme Court decisions relating to marriage in the last fifty years.

70. LLRX -- Update To A Guide To The U.S. Federal Legal System Web-based Public Acce Cases heard by the supreme court usually involve questions about the Constitution University of Virginia School of Law federal Administrative decisions http://www.llrx.com/features/us_fed2.htm

Navigation Advanced Search Law Pro Links LLRX Buzz LLRX Top 10 Meta Links Newstand Resource Centers - Document Delivery - Comparative and Foreign Law - International Law - Intranets/Knowledge Management - Marketing - Search Engines Update to A Guide to the U.S. Federal Legal System: Web-Based Publicly Accessible Sources By Gretchen Feltes Gretchen Feltes is the Reference Librarian at the New York University School of Law Library Published November 1, 2001, Updated: August 15, 2002, July 21, 2003 and October 15, 2003 Editor's note: Additional resources and changes to Website addresses for this current update are indicated by  (turquoise background color) for easy identification. Table of Contents I. Introduction II. Introduction to the United States Federal System A. The Structure of the Federal Government B. The Constitution ... VII. Tutorials I. Introduction I was asked by my colleague at the New York University School of Law Library, Mirela Roznovschi, to prepare this guide to US legal research for the International/Foreign Law section of this website originally published on October 1, 2000. I have since updated this guide several times. For this reason, I have chosen to treat the United States like a foreign jurisdiction and to address the guide to legal researchers in a more global setting. I have made the assumption that access to printed sources and fee-based databases is limited. This guide is intended to direct legal research through publicly accessible web-based databases. It is not intended to supplant traditional sources of legal research. Indeed the initiative to make primary law sources available freely accessible on the internet is new. Most databases begin holdings in the mid-1990s.

71. Statements From Officials In Medical Marijuana States: "Nothing's Changed" Since How will the court decision affect Mainers? Not much, said Assistant the US supreme court ruled that they can be prosecuted under federal drug laws. http://www.mpp.org/raich/officials.html

In All 10 Medical Marijuana States, Officials Say "Nothing's Changed" Since Gonzales v. Raich Take Action! Background on Gonzales v. Raich What happens next? Read more here about what's next for patients, states, and medical marijuana advocates. Public Reaction: Public Condemns Medical Marijuana Arrests While Drug Warriors Push On Support MPP's hard-hitting aggressive lobbying work by making a financial donation today. The U.S. Supreme Court's June 6 ruling in Gonzales v. Raich does not affect states' ability to pass medical marijuana law and it does not overturn the laws now protecting the right of 57 million Americans living in Alaska, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Maine, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Vermont, and Washington to use medical marijuana legally under state laws. Top officials in all 10 states with medical marijuana laws have publicly affirmed that the Court's decision in Raich does not impact their medical marijuana laws. "Attorney General David Márquez has advised the Alaska Department of Health and Social Services that the recent United States Supreme Court decision in Gonzales v. Raich

72. ELS - ERD - Law By Country - United States Substantive Law statutes/Acts Codes Regulations Cases court Rules supreme court Rules; court of Appeals Local Rules. federal Circuit Eighth Circuit http://www.law.emory.edu/erd/fedlaw.html

United States Substantive Law Constitution Bills Presidential Papers Legislative Histories ... Court Rules See also: GPO Access (including Monthly Catalog of Government Publications) and FedWorld Constitution of the United States Text Cornell Browsable only Emory Browsable and searchable, with amendments never ratified Library of Congress Browsable and searchable (From Library of Congress) House of Representatives Browsable only Text with Annotations GPO Access Findlaw Codes Uniform Codes Uniform Commercial Code (Cornell LII) Uniform Probate Code (Cornell LII) United States Code Cornell Law School GPO Access US House of Representatives Statutes/Acts Congressional Record Thomas Beginning with 1989 GPO Access Beginning with 1995 Public Laws Thomas full text, from 101st Congress; summaries, from 93rd Congress GPO Access full text, from 104th Congress) Bills Budget of the United States Office of Management and Budget Browsable Congressional Bills GPO Access Thomas Congressional Record Thomas Beginning with 1995, Volume 141

73. Saint Louis University Law School Library Digest of United States supreme court Reports (Lexis Law Publishing) federal Rules decisions (FRD) - District court decisions on federal Rules of http://law.slu.edu/library/research/federalstats.htm

law school about slu apply now contact slu ... slu home Quick Clicks Academic Calendar Alumni Banner Calendar Campus Photos Career Services Employment Law Events and News Fall 2005 Financial Assistance FYI Gateway Portal Health Law International Law Job Postings Law Library Legal Clinics Lexis-Nexis Mail.Slu.Edu Organizations People Finder Public Service St. Louis Attractions Student Web WebCam WebCT Webstar Westlaw Library Home Merlin, the Online Catalog Library Services Guides and Publications ... Hot Links Regular Hours Mon.-Thurs. 7:30a.m.-Midnight Friday 7:30a.m.-7p.m. Saturday 9a.m.-6p.m. Sunday 10 a.m.-Midnight See Library Hours Web page for a complete listing of holiday hours. webstar contact us Compiled by the Saint Louis University Law Library** Statutes Statutes provide the law as enacted by a legislative body. Generally, statutes are a good place to begin legal research. The annotated statutes provide additional information that aids in understanding and supporting legal positions, including cites to digest topics, regulations, articles, practice sources and case law. Federal legislation can be found in a variety of sources: United States Statutes at Large (Stat.) - provides a chronological listing of laws and presents the law as it was passed in Congress.

74. Christopher Center Library Services: Legal Resources supreme court Reporter (S.Ct.) Law KF101 .U59 federal Reporter (F) Law KF105 .F45 decisions of the Indiana supreme court from May 1847 to 1981. http://www.valpo.edu/library/user/legalres.html

Legal Resources Types of Law Statutory law refers to laws that have been passed by a legislative body. This includes statutes, constitutions and rules of court. Citation: 20 U.S.C. 1681 20 = volume number U.S.C. = set name (United States Code) 1681 = section number Case law refers to the decisions of courts and administrative bodies. Citation: DeFunis v. Odegard 416 U.S. 312 DeFunis v. Odegard = name of the case 416 = volume number U.S. = court reporter name (United States Court Reporter) 312 = page number Administrative law refers to the regulations of administrative bodies, such as government agencies. Citation: 50 CFR 17 50 = title or volume number CFR = set name (Code of Federal Regulations) 17 = section number Dictionaries and Encyclopedias Black's Law Dictionary QRef KF156 .B53 (also at

75. Guantanamo Bay, Supreme Court Litigation - Rasul V. Bush The Modern Habeas Statute. The supreme court pointed out that in today s federal habeas www.cdi.org/news/law/rasuldecision.pdf. Rasul v. Bush, No. http://www.cdi.org/news/law/gtmo-sct-decision.cfm

Center for Defense Information ISLP Home Old Site Search Media ... Feedback CDI Washington CDI Brussels CDI Moscow 09:18 AM 09/21/05 03:18 PM 09/21/05 05:18 PM 09/21/05 Updates site optimized for Firefox Roberts Confirmation Hearings: FISA National Security Court Roberts Supreme Court Nomination Nuclear Terrorism Convention Guantanamo Bay Supreme Court Litigation Supreme Court Guantanamo Decision Steven C. Welsh CDI Research Analyst June 30, 2004 printer-friendly version With a decision notably brief for the mountain of argument leading up to it, the U.S. Supreme Court in Rasul v. Bush held on June 28, 2004, that foreign nationals imprisoned without charge at the Guantanamo Bay interrogation camps were entitled to bring legal action challenging their captivity in U.S. federal civilian courts. Justice John Paul Stephens' majority opinion was joined by Justices Sandra Day O'Conner, David Souter, Ruth Bader-Ginsburg, and Stephen Breyer. Justice Anthony Kennedy joined in the decision but disagreed sufficiently with the majority's analysis to issue a separate concurring opinion. Justice Antonin Scalia authored a dissenting opinion, joined by Chief Justice William Rehnquist and Justice Clarence Thomas. The decision addressed the question of "whether United States courts lacked jurisdiction to consider challenges to the legality of the detention of foreign nationals captured abroad in connection with hostilities and incarcerated at the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base, Cuba."

76. Article - Supreme Court Review: Current Employment Law Cases The best law firms read Employment Law Memo. Cases from all federal and state The US supreme court reversed, holding that the appropriate statute of http://www.lawmemo.com/articles/current.htm

Employment Law Memo World's Best Home Search Caselaw Database Sample Employment Law Memo Supreme Court ... Try it The best law firms read Employment Law Memo . Cases from all federal and state appellate courts. Try it for 4 weeks. Articles Editor: Ross Runkel Professor of Law Emeritus email Bio Don't Miss Four week evaluation of Employment Law Memo RSS Feeds (what?) DOOCES WILD: How Employers Can Survive the New Technological Poker Game of Employee Blogging Read Work Law Blogs View Several Sample Memos Supreme Court Reviews: Supreme Court Review: 2004-2005 Employment Law Cases By Ross Runkel Bio email Editor, Employment Law Memo Pending Supreme Court cases Cases Decided False Claims Act retaliation claim statute of limitations is the most analogous state statute Graham County Soil v. US ex rel Wilson (06/20/2005): Wilson sued under the federal False Claims Act (FCA) claiming her employer retaliated against her for alerting federal officials to purported fraud and for cooperating with the ensuing investigation. The trial court dismissed the suit as untimely under the state's 3-year statute of limitations; the 4th Circuit reversed, applying the FCA's 6-year limitation period. The US Supreme Court reversed, holding that the appropriate statute of limitations in a False Claims Act retaliation case is the most closely analogous state statute, not the 6-year period stated in the FCA.

77. WisBar | Legal Research WisBar s archive of case law administrative decisions Wisconsin supreme court opinions 1995 to present; Wisconsin court of Appeals opinions - March http://www.wisbar.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Legal_Research

78. CitizenLink - Features - The Supreme Court's Fall Cases Accentuate The Summer He Gonzales, struck down the federal partialbirth abortion statute because it did not These cases might reach the supreme court by the fall of 2006. http://www.family.org/cforum/feature/a0037319.cfm

var PageTitle = escape( document.title ); var WebsiteId = "CIT"; var StyleSheet = "EAF_stylesheet.css"; var LogoImage = ""; var RefUrl = document.location.href; About Us Contact Press Citizen Link ... Subscribe/Join Family Policy Councils State Councils Family News In Focus Listen Find a Station Focus on Social Issues ... Cloning/Stem Cell Research End of Life Issues Euthanasia/Physician Assisted Suicide Genetics Constitutional Freedoms Constitutional Theory The Congress ... The House of Representatives The Senate The Courts Circuit Courts State Courts ... Gay Activism in Schools Home Schooling Legislation Public Education Religious Expression ... Consequences of Gambling Gambling in the U.S. The Lottery Cohabitation Divorce ... Marriage Recovery Initiatives Same-Sex Unions Origins Persecution Political Islam ... Citizen Action/ Anti-Porn Efforts Legislative, Judicial The Harm of Pornography Support the Ministry Donate Online Give Monthly Volunteers Creative Giving Pray for Focus July 25, 2005 The Supreme Court's Fall Cases Accentuate the Summer Hearing Process by Bruce Hausknecht, legal issues analyst, Focus on the Family A

79. Military Law -- The Feres Docrine (Supreme Court Decision) Legislation Military Law The Feres Docrine (supreme court Decision) This provision recognizes and assimilates into federal law the rules of http://usmilitary.about.com/library/milinfo/blferes.htm

zJs=10 zJs=11 zJs=12 zJs=13 zc(5,'jsc',zJs,9999999,'') About Careers U.S. Military Military Legislation Military Law The Feres Docrine (Supreme Court Decision) Careers U.S. Military Essentials Military Pay Charts ... Help zau(256,140,140,'el','http://z.about.com/0/ip/417/C.htm','');w(xb+xb+' ');zau(256,140,140,'von','http://z.about.com/0/ip/496/7.htm','');w(xb+xb); FREE Newsletter Sign Up Now for the U.S. Military newsletter! See Online Courses Search U.S. Military U.S. Supreme Court FERES v. UNITED STATES, 340 U.S. 135 (1950) 340 U.S. 135 FERES, EXECUTRIX, v. UNITED STATES. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.* No. 9. Argued October 12, 1950. Decided December 4, 1950. The United States is not liable under the Federal Tort Claims Act for injuries to members of the armed forces sustained while on active duty and not on furlough and resulting from the negligence of others in the armed forces. Pp. 136-146. (a) The Tort Claims Act should be construed to fit, so far as will comport with its words, into the entire statutory system of remedies against the Government to make a workable, consistent and equitable whole. P. 139. (b) One of the purposes of the Act was to transfer from Congress to the courts the burden of examining tort claims against the Government; and Congress was not burdened with private bills on behalf of military and naval personnel, because a comprehensive system of relief had been authorized by statute for them and their dependents. Pp. 139-140.

80. FCLR Home Page -- © 1999 FMJA The federal courts Law Review (FCLR) is an electronic law review dedicated United States supreme court © Ernest and Kathleen Meredith courtesy of http://www.fclr.org/content/fclr.htm

Articles Reviews Subscribe Free Contact Editor ... How to Cite Articles Frequently Asked Questions Links FMJA E-mail: Editor In Chief Sign / View Our: Guestbook Site Map Statistics Best Viewed at 800 x 600 with IE 5.x using a medium text size. Welcome The Federal Courts Law Review (FCLR) is an electronic law review dedicated to legal scholarship relating to federal courts. Articles are from scholars, judges and distinguished practitioners. The editorial board, composed primarily of United States Magistrate Judges and law school professors, uniquely combines the insight of the federal judiciary with the perspective of law school academics. The FCLR, founded in July 1997, is a publication of the Federal Magistrate Judges Association FMJA The FCLR Welcomes A New Editor-In-Chief At its annual meeting in 2005, the Federal Magistrate Judges Association congratulated United States Magistrate Judge Sam A. Joyner on the completion of his six years of service as Editor in Chief of the Federal Courts Law Review. The Association commended Judge Joyner on his vital, creative, and diligent service as Editor in Chief from 1999 to 2005 and indicated that he played a central role in developing the Review from its inception to its current, well-respected prominence. Judge Joyner will remain a member of the Board of Editors but has now been succeeded as Editor in Chief by United States Magistrate Judge John M. Facciola of the District of Columbia. Electronic Format

A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P  Q  R  S  T  U  V  W  X  Y  Z

Page 4     61-80 of 108    Back | 1  | 2  | 3  | 4  | 5  | 6  | Next 20