Geometry.Net - the online learning center
Home  - Basic_C - Canadian Supreme Court
e99.com Bookstore
  
Images 
Newsgroups
Page 6     101-113 of 113    Back | 1  | 2  | 3  | 4  | 5  | 6 
A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P  Q  R  S  T  U  V  W  X  Y  Z  

         Canadian Supreme Court:     more books (59)
  1. In personal injury suit by extraditee against Germany, Canadian Supreme Court rejects U.S.'s contentions as intervenor that distinction between acta jure ... An article from: International Law Update
  2. Resolving conflicting lower court rulings, Canadian Supreme Court holds that Radio Communications Act bars unlicensed Canadian company from enabling Canadian ... An article from: International Law Update
  3. Canadian Supreme Court, citing U.S. cases, holds that complete transfer of plaintiff's original designs from paper to canvas did not constitute copying ... An article from: International Law Update
  4. Canadian Supreme Court rules that Internet provider that downloads copyrighted music onto cache to speed up transmission and reduce costs does not thereby ... An article from: International Law Update
  5. Canadian Supreme Court upholds Glaxo/Wellcome's patent on AZT as treatment for HIV and AIDS but concludes, inter alia, that NIH researchers who verified ... An article from: International Law Update
  6. In 5 to 4 split, Canadian Supreme Court concludes that "transgenic animals" produced by Harvard researchers for use in cancer investigations are not patentable ... An article from: International Law Update
  7. Canadian Supreme Court rules that dutiable value of trade- marked goods sold by Mattel, Inc. to its Canadian subsidiary does not include royalties or license ... An article from: International Law Update
  8. Minister ponders appointment to Supreme Court.(Canadian Classroom)(Justice Minister Irwin Cotler )(lobbying for appointment of aboriginal judges to Supreme ... of Canada): An article from: Wind Speaker by Paul Barnsley, 2004-06-01
  9. Patterns of decision-making in the Canadian Supreme Court: 1949-1985 by Panu Sittiwong, 1986
  10. Supreme Court and Canadian Federalism the Laskin Dickson Years by K. Swinton, 1990-06
  11. The Supreme Court Decisions on the Canadian Constitution
  12. The Supreme Court Decisions on the Canadian Constitution by Canada, 1981-01-01
  13. An unknown but not a secret process: appointment of Supreme Court Justices.: An article from: Canadian Parliamentary Review by Irwin Cotler, 2004-06-22
  14. Supreme Court supports same-sex marriage.(Canadian news): An article from: Presbyterian Record by Amy MacLachlan, 2005-01-01

101. Mapleleafweb.com: Research - Supreme Court Of Canada Charter Summaries
Mapleleafweb.com, Canada s Premier Political Website summaries supreme court ofCanada charter decisions.
http://www.mapleleafweb.com/scc/public3/
Site Map Contact Help Feature Sections Features Spotlight Voter Almanac Interviews Political Action "How To" Guides Interaction Discussion Forums Mailing List Web Chats Polls Link Directory View Links Submit Link Research Supreme Court
Charter Cases
Site Info Contact Us Help Site Search About Us Research: You are here: Home Supreme Court Summaries Home Indexes Search Summaries FAQ ... Researchers Top Requested Summaries
  • R. v Morgentaler R. v Butler R. v Latimer R. v. Daviault ... R. v. Collins

  • Update Mailing List Subscribe Subscribe Unsubscribe Welcome to the Mapleleafweb.com's Canadian Supreme Court Charter Decision Summary and Research Resource. We are still placing a lot of the charter summaries on the site, and certain sections have yet to be completed. So please be patient as we complete this section.
    Newly Added Summaries (Oct 23/2002)
  • Mills v. The Queen
  • 102. CBC News: Supreme Court OK's Same-sex Marriage
    OTTAWA The supreme court of Canada says the federal government can change thedefinition of marriage, giving gays and lesbians the legal right to marry.
    http://www.cbc.ca/story/canada/national/2004/12/09/scoc-gaymarriage041209.html
    CBCCat = "Sports,News,Arts,Kids,Interactive"; Sports = "Hockey,Baseball,Football"; News = "Canada,World,SciTech,Local,Consumers,SpecialReports,Business"; Arts = "ArtsNews,Infoculture,Music,Books,ArtsFeatures"; Kids = "CBC4Kids,PreSchool,Teachers"; Interactive = "MessageBoards,Forums,Games,Media";
    CBC is currently experiencing a labour disruption.
    Supreme Court OK's same-sex marriage
    Last Updated Fri, 10 Dec 2004 13:30:57 EST CBC News OTTAWA - The Supreme Court of Canada says the federal government can change the definition of marriage, giving gays and lesbians the legal right to marry. Stephen Harper In a non-binding opinion released Thursday morning, the court reaffirmed religious freedoms under the Charter, saying religious officials opposed to same-sex marriages do not have to perform them. It declined to answer a fourth question added by Paul Martin when he became prime minister: whether the current definition of marriage as a man and a woman was unconstitutional. But the court said that by failing to appeal a number of lower court rulings that said excluding gays from marriage was discriminatory, the federal government had already accepted that position.

    103. CBC News: Top Court Strikes Down Quebec Private Health-care Ban
    The supreme court of Canada ruled Thursday that the Quebec government cannotprevent people from paying for private insurance for healthcare procedures
    http://www.cbc.ca/story/canada/national/2005/06/09/newscoc-health050609.html
    CBCCat = "Sports,News,Arts,Kids,Interactive"; Sports = "Hockey,Baseball,Football"; News = "Canada,World,SciTech,Local,Consumers,SpecialReports,Business"; Arts = "ArtsNews,Infoculture,Music,Books,ArtsFeatures"; Kids = "CBC4Kids,PreSchool,Teachers"; Interactive = "MessageBoards,Forums,Games,Media";
    CBC is currently experiencing a labour disruption.
    Top court strikes down Quebec private health-care ban
    Last Updated Thu, 09 Jun 2005 21:33:36 EDT CBC News The Supreme Court of Canada ruled Thursday that the Quebec government cannot prevent people from paying for private insurance for health-care procedures covered under medicare. In a 4-3 decision, the panel of seven justices said banning private insurance for a list of services ranging from MRI tests to cataract surgery was unconstitutional under the Quebec Charter of Rights, given that the public system has failed to guarantee patients access to those services in a timely way. As a result of delays in receiving tests and surgeries, patients have suffered and even died in some cases, justices Beverley McLachlin, Jack Major, Michel Bastarache and Marie Deschamps found for the majority.

    104. Supreme Court Of Canada: 1992 Zündel Judgement
    supreme court of Canada File No. 21811. 1991 December 10 1992 August 27.Present La Forest, L HeureuxDube, Sopinka, Gonthier, Cory,
    http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/people/z/zundel-ernst/supreme-court/
    Ernst*Zundel,*Appellant;
    v.
    Her Majesty The Queen, Respondent, and
    The Attorney General of Canada, the Attorney General of
    Manitoba, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, the League
    for Human Rights
    of B'Nai Brith Canada and the Canadian Jewish
    Congress
    , Interveners. Reported at: [1992] 2 S.C.R. 731 [1992] S.C.J. No. 70 Supreme Court of Canada
    File No.: 21811.
    1991: December 10: 1992: August 27.
    Present: La Forest, L'Heureux-Dube, Sopinka, Gonthier, Cory,
    McLachlin and Iacobucci JJ. The original plaintext version of this file is available via ftp Home Funding Search ... Make Nizkor your home page

    105. Uni.ca - Supreme Court Of Canada Reference 1998
    supreme court of Canada, FEDERAL GOVERNMENT REFERENCE TO THE supreme court OF Here are the questions that the Government of Canada asked the court
    http://www.uni.ca/rule_law.html
    F EDERAL G OVERNMENT R EFERENCE TO T HE S UPREME C OURT OF C ANADA Not only is no man above the law, but also every man, whatever be his rank or condition, is subject to the ordinary law of the realm and amenable to the jurisdiction of the ordinary tribunals.
    A. V. DICEY, Law of the Constitution For inasmuch as reason is beautiful and gentle, and not violent, her rule must needs have ministers in order to help her in vanquishing the other principles.
    PLATO, Laws I, 644. INFORMATION
    More Background -

    uni.ca

    Federal Department

    of Justice
    ...
    CCU

    t i m e l i n e August 21, 1998 - Bouchard changes his tune and accepts parts of the ruling (in French) causing Unity Minister Dion to fire back once again August 20, 1998 - Decision released - full text Synopsis:
    • Answers are no; no; no need to respond
    • The four fundamentals of the Constitution lie in federalism, democracy, the rule of law and constitutionalism, and respect for minorities. None of these trumps the other.

    106. SC Hears Case
    Schmeiser Case Heard Before Canada s supreme court Lawyers for agribusinesstitan Monsanto Co. drew pointed questions from the Canada supreme court on
    http://www.percyschmeiser.com/SC Hears Case.htm
    Monsanto vs Schmeiser
    The Classic David vs Goliath Struggle..... Schmeiser Case Heard Before Canada's Supreme Court P AUL ELIAS, AP Biotechnology Writer
    (01-20) 15:04 PST OTTAWA (AP) Lawyers for agribusiness titan Monsanto Co. drew pointed questions from the Canada Supreme Court on Tuesday in a dispute with a Saskatchewan canola grower that has become a cause for biotechnology opponents and proponents around the globe. The court could takes months to rule on the dispute, which began in 1997 when Monsanto discovered its canola plant, genetically engineered to withstand the company's popular weed killer, growing on Percy Schmeiser's farm. The suit alleges Schmeiser obtained Monsanto seeds without paying for them. Schmeiser contends the company's canola accidentally took root on his farm, possibly falling from a passing truck or arriving with a gust from a neighboring farm. Two lower courts found in Monsanto's favor and ordered Schmeiser to pay the company about $140,000 in damages and legal costs. Some farmers, especially those from developing nations, fear that natural or accidental contamination of their conventional crops with biotech varieties will give biotech companies licenses to seize their crops.

    107. Broadband » News » Supreme Court Of Canada Snubs Music Industry - High Court R
    supreme court of Canada snubs music industry High court refuses to hear any In fact, the supreme court has refused to hear any further arguments on the
    http://www.broadbandreports.com/shownews/65982

    Register
    or Search for:
    search words
    or ZIP code
    Find Service

    Reviews

    Front Page

    FAQs+Info
    ...
    About us

    Spread Firefox!
    News Jump Google Building Massive Fiber Network The Skype-Killing Box Who Would You Rather Buy the 'Triple Play' From? Mashboxx to Acquire Grokster BPL: Next Big Thing or Already Washed Up? Dell Embraces Verizon Wireless Broadband Fios Install Snafus Moms Against the RIAA Morning Broadband Bytes BT Striving for 100% Broadband Coverage Steamy Mobile Porn Coming to the U.S. Comcast Juggles Channels Qwest Not Seeing the Light Will Google Bid on AOL? Sprint Windows Mobile 5.0 PPC Phone Worm Redirects Google Searches Industry Positive on '96 Act Rewrite Firefox Honeymoon Over? Cable: 75.8% More Expensive than DSL AO-MSN? MSOL? Summary Most Discussed Supreme Court of Canada snubs music industry High Court refuses to hear any further arguments Posted on 2005-07-29 14:17:49 The Globe and Mail reports that the Canadian Private Copying Collective's (CPCC) efforts to get the ruling on MP3 player levies in Canada reinstated has fallen on deaf ears. In fact, the Supreme Court has refused to hear any further arguments on the case. Last year, the Federal Court of Canada overturned legislation that imposed high levies on the sale of MP3 players, originally meant as a way to reimburse music composers, singers, and artists against illegal file trading. Ironically, the CPCC still collects levies on blank CD media, but as

    108. The Supreme Court Of Canada - Ottawa Attractions
    The supreme court stands a short distance from Parliament Hill a reminderthat, while the judiciary is a branch of Canada s government, it is completely
    http://www.ottawakiosk.com/supreme_court.html
    Ottawa Attractions Choose from these Attractions:
    The Supreme Court of Canada
    The Supreme Court stands a short distance from Parliament Hill a reminder that, while the judiciary is a branch of Canada's government, it is completely independent from the legislative and executive branches of government. The Supreme Court interprets the Canadian constitution and is the highest court of appeal in the land. It hears criminal and civil cases from the ten provincial courts, the three territorial courts and from the Federal Court. Quick Facts Open
    May to August daily, from 9 am to 5 pm. Guided tours of the courtrooms are offered every day, including weekends. Closed Saturday and Sunday from 12 pm to 1 pm. Reservations for guided tours are required during the rest of the year and guided tours are offered only Monday to Friday, from 9 am to 5 pm. Cost : Free Services
    Wheelchair accessible, parking on nearby streets.
    Center block: wheelchair acces via the door under the main entrance of the Peace Tower acces.
    East block: wheelchair acces by west entrance, elevators to 2nd floor; Guided tours available, check schedule.

    109. Court Ruling Expected To Change Canada's Health Care System - The Boston Globe -
    TORONTO Canada s supreme court dealt a powerful blow to the state monopoly onhealth care yesterday, striking down a Quebec ban on private health
    http://www.boston.com/news/world/articles/2005/06/10/court_ruling_expected_to_ch
    Today's Globe Opinion Magazine Education ... World
    Court ruling expected to change Canada's health care system
    June 10, 2005 TORONTO Canada's Supreme Court dealt a powerful blow to the state monopoly on health care yesterday, striking down a Quebec ban on private health insurance for services provided under the country's system of universal coverage. Although the unanimous ruling applies only to Quebec, it is expected to spur similar cases in other Canadian provinces and accelerate a growing movement pushing for more private care. In recent years, Canada's Medicare was plagued by long waiting lists and a lack of doctors, nurses, and state-of-the-art equipment. Some patients wait months for surgery, MRI machines are scarce, and many Canadians travel to the United States for treatment. But government leaders defend the current system, and Medicare supporters voiced fears the ruling will bring a two-tiered system favoring those with money. Proponents of change say it will improve care by offering more choices and cut waiting times for treatment. The Supreme Court said Quebec's prohibition violated the province's charter of rights by threatening the lives of patients, and the justices noted other countries have successfully combined private and public care.

    110. Reference To The Supreme Court Of Canada
    Media release on the reference testing the constitutionality of proposed Federalsamesex marriage legislation.
    http://canada.justice.gc.ca/en/news/nr/2003/doc_30946.html
    Backgrounder Reference to the Supreme Court of Canada On June 10, the Ontario Court of Appeal ruled that the opposite-sex requirement for marriage is unconstitutional and directed that marriage in the province of Ontario be open to same-sex couples. The Court stated that its decision does not in any way deal or interfere with the religious institution of marriage. The Court ordered its decision to take effect immediately. The Ontario decision follows on a similar decision of the British Columbia Court of Appeal on May 1 of this year. Although the British Columbia decision originally gave Parliament until July 12, 2004, to change its legislation to fit this new definition, it lifted that suspension order on July 8, effectively allowing same-sex couples to marry in that province immediately. Another similar decision of the Quebec Superior Court allowed same-sex marriages effective September 2004. The Quebec case is still before the Quebec Court of Appeal. On June 17, 2003, the Prime Minister announced that the Government of Canada would not appeal the decisions of the courts of appeal in British Columbia and Ontario on the definition of marriage. On July 15, 2003, the Government of Canada also withdrew its appeal from the Quebec case.

    111. Decision Of The Supreme Court Of Canada On The Marriage Reference
    The supreme court of Canada rendered its decision on December 9, 2004, in theMarriage Reference. The court ruled. Section 1 of the Government’s proposed
    http://canada.justice.gc.ca/en/news/fs/2004/doc_31342.html
    Decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on the Marriage Reference The Supreme Court of Canada rendered its decision on December 9, 2004, in the Marriage Reference.  The Court ruled:
    • Section 1 of the Government’s proposed legislation extending civil marriage to same-sex couples is constitutional and that its very purpose flows from the Charter (para. 43); The Charter protects religious officials from being compelled to perform marriages between two persons of the same sex if it is contrary to their religious beliefs (paras. 59 and 60); Section 2 of the proposed legislation on the protection of religious freedom goes beyond federal jurisdiction into matters that are provincial jurisdiction.  Religious freedom is already protected by the Charter, but if additional protections are desired, they would have to be done by the Provinces and Territories (para. 37); The Court declined to answer the question on whether the opposite-sex requirement for marriage is constitutional, as they felt it was unnecessary, in light of the unique combination of factors at play (para. 71).
    Further details on the Court’s response to each of the questions follow.

    112. The Globe And Mail
    Toronto — The fight over a levy on IPods and other digital music devices endedThursday when the supreme court of Canada refused to hear any further
    http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20050728.wscoc0728/BNStory/Na
    @import url('/cssv3/net5upcss.css'); News Investing Technology Vehicles ... Careers Search Site More Search Options/Archives Search Tips
    Purchase this article.
    No extra tax on IPods, MP3 players
    Canadian Press Thursday, July 28, 2005 Toronto That means there will be no levy applied to digital audio recorders such as Apple's popular IPod and IPod Shuffle as well as other MP3 players like IRiver. The full text of this article has 301 words
    Purchasing from globeandmail.com is quick and secure
    Do you have a username and password on globeandmail.com? Please login
    Login Here
    Username:
    Password: Forgot Your Username or Password? Remember me on this computer
    Want to learn more about purchasing articles? Please see below.
    Purchasing this article
    Globeandmail.com offers a full selection of pay-per-view archived articles dating back to 2002, as well as articles available to INSIDER Edition members. Purchase a single article or enjoy a greater value with a 4- or 10-article multi-pack
    Not registered with globeandmail.com?
    Register now. It is quick and free. Once you are registered you will be able to purchase this article.

    113. Clark University
    European Union homepage European court of Justice homepage canadian Supremecourt canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
    http://www2.clarku.edu/research/access/government/millerD.shtml
    Judicial Activism:
    Discover! Judicial Activism:
    In Depth Meet the Researchers I Meet the Researchers II Meet the Participants Learn More! European Union
    homepage
    European Court of
    Justice homepage
    ... Help
    Clark University
    950 Main Street
    Worcester, MA 01610
    Privacy Policy
    Home > Judicial Activism 40 percent of undergraduates volunteer in the community.
    Professor Mark Miller Countries under the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice. Click to enlarge. Provinces and Territories of Canada. Click to enlarge. European Court of Justice. Click to enlarge. Canadian Supreme Court building in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. Click to enlarge. Photo Supreme Court of Canada. Photographer: Philippe Landreville Photograph Inc.
    Discover!
    Courting controversy: the evolving activism of high courts
    Chads and recounts from the last presidential election aside, the U.S. Supreme Court isn't the only high court flexing its muscles. For Professor Mark Miller and advisee Dan Bresette '01, following the activities of courts and congresses is a favorite pastime. While Bresette researches Congress's role in foreign policy during the Clinton years, Miller has been attending to the role of high courts in making policy.

    A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P  Q  R  S  T  U  V  W  X  Y  Z  

    Page 6     101-113 of 113    Back | 1  | 2  | 3  | 4  | 5  | 6 

    free hit counter