21. Bio Statement On 2003 Planting Estimates For Biotechnology Crops Dr. Michael J. Phillips, executive director for food and agriculture of theBiotechnology Industry Organization (BIO), issued the following statement in http://www.monsanto.co.uk/news/ukshowlib.phtml?uid=7148

22. Health & Medical News - Monsanto Registers 5 Biotechnology Crops - 04/05/1999 Monsanto registers 5 biotechnology crops The multinational chemical and seedcompany Monsanto has registered five biotechnology crops with federal http://www.abc.net.au/science/news/health/HealthRepublish_23885.htm

ABC Home Radio Television News ... Podcasts Print Email to a friend Monsanto registers 5 biotechnology crops Tuesday, 4 May 1999 The multinational chemical and seed company Monsanto has registered five biotechnology crops with federal health authorities that may be used in foods coming into Australia. Under new regulations all foods derived from gene technology are required to come under the scrutiny of the Australian and New Zealand Food Authority to ensure they meet public health standards. Monsanto's Nic Tydens says the crops, which include an insect and disease resistant potato and a new variety of insect resistant corn, aren't grown in Australia, but may be found in imported goods. "They'll either appear as, or mostly would appear as ingredients in processed and packaged foods, either as protein isolates in various food, oils, corn syrup, fructose sugar, oils of one sort of another, either canola oil or cottonseed oil or soybean oil," Mr. Tydens said. ABC Online Rural News Related Stories The Lab's coverage of the Citizen's Consensus Conference on genetically modified foods Monsanto Australia More News Ancient Worlds Archives Print Email to a friend Email us Back to latest news All Science News Ancient Worlds ... Bionic kidney on the cards Search News in Science News Archive Previous news stories Health Features Science by Topic ... Email List first name surname email subscribe unsubscribe About Us News in Science The Lab contact ... thelab@your.abc.net.au

23. BIO | Benefits Of Agricultural Biotechnology Higher yields of biotechnology crops have been reported by a number of respectedsources biotechnology crops can improve the nutritional value of foods, http://www.bio.org/foodag/action/fact2.asp

www.BIO.org Join BIO Member Directory Member Services ... Membership Directory BIO Videos National Issues Health Care Bioethics Intellectual Property ... Science Updates search current area only Advanced Search contact Biotechnology Industry Organization 1225 Eye Street NW Suite 400 Washington, DC 20005 info@bio.org Biotechnology information, advocacy and business support National Issues Legislative Action Benefits of Agricultural Biotechnology Printer Friendly Agricultural biotechnology improves crop plants by providing built-in protection against diseases and insects, and by instilling herbicide tolerance, which creates opportunities to produce more and better foods in a sustainable way. Following are some of the current benefits of biotechnology, and opportunities for the future. Fewer Pesticides Agricultural biotechnology promotes the sustainability of natural resources. The built-in protection against disease and insects reduces the need to apply conventional insecticides, thereby reducing handling, exposure and potential spillage. For example, Bt cotton has reduced pesticide usage by an estimated two million pounds since its introduction. Herbicide-tolerant plants also reduce usage of older, less efficient soil-applied herbicides. Reduced Soil Erosion The use of crops produced through biotechnology can contribute to a decrease in erosion because harmful weeds are controlled while the crop thrives, thereby promoting no-till and conservation tillage systems. These tillage systems are effective for helping to save the soil, conserve soil moisture and nutrients, preserve earthworm populations, and reduce sediment runoff into watersheds.

24. "Battle Over Biotechnology Intensifies Trade War" they have been unable to export some biotechnology crops to Europe. new biotechnology crops like certain varieties of genetically altered corn. http://www.biotech-info.net/battle_intensifies.html

"Battle Over Biotechnology Intensifies Trade War" Elizabeth Becker with David Barboza New York Times May 29, 2003 WASHINGTON, May 28 — President Bush said last week that Europe's opposition to genetically altered crops was a threat to efforts to end world hunger. But even many critics of Europe's stance say that the president's argument does not stand up and that the dispute needs to be understood for what it is: a multibillion-dollar cross-Atlantic battle over agricultural trade. The disagreement will be played out this week at the meeting in France of the leading industrial countries. It pits European leaders, who say they are worried about the safety of importing genetically altered crops from the United States, against the Bush administration, which insists that Europe's attempts to block the crops are an illegal trade tactic. The trade dispute heated up after an intense lobbying effort here in Washington, where some of the nation's most powerful interest groups — farmers, the food industry and giant biotechnology companies — have been pressing the administration to take on their case at a time of heightened tensions between the United States and Europe. Lawyers and lobbyists for some interest groups have descended on the White House and Capitol Hill over the last few weeks to influence policy makers and lawmakers, and in some cases, to simply remind them of the importance of the Farm Belt in the next election.

25. Modified Foods Put Companies In A Quandry But many say that biotechnology crops are so pervasive that it would be Over the last few years, biotechnology crops have come to dominate the food http://www.biotech-info.net/quandry.html

"Modified Foods Put Companies in a Quandry" David Barboza New York Times June 3, 2000 CHICAGO, June 3 Frito-Lay announced in January that it would stop using biotechnology-based corn in its chips. Gerber Products has banned genetically modified ingredients from its baby food. And McDonald's has asked its suppliers not to ship it genetically altered potatoes. But despite these recent announcements, all made in response to public concerns over genetically altered foods, none of these companies is actually abandoning biotechnology. PepsiCo, Frito-Lay's parent company, continues to use corn syrup made from genetically altered crops in its soft drinks. Novartis, the parent of Gerber, remains one of the leading producers of genetically altered seeds. And McDonald's cooks French fries in vegetable oil made from genetically altered corn and soybeans. These seeming contradictions reflect the marketing quandary facing the nation's biggest food companies in the debate over genetically altered crops, which environmentalists contend are potentially dangerous but which the Food and Drug Administration has deemed entirely safe. Though nearly all the big food producers publicly support biotechnology, a growing number of companies are quietly limiting its use. But many say that biotechnology crops are so pervasive that it would be prohibitively expensive, and in some cases, nearly impossible, to eliminate them entirely.

26. Biotechnology In CTAHR biotechnology crops in Hawai i involve seeds already approved by government agencies.Advertiser library photo. The Hawaii Agriculture Research Center has http://www.ctahr.hawaii.edu/gmo/inHawaii.asp

UH CTAHR Home Biotechnology in Hawai'i Assessment of the potential for gene flow from agricultural crops to native plant relatives in the Hawaiian Islands Review -Summary- -Appendix- Hawai'i can decide if biotech has role in island agriculture COMMENTARY -From Honolulu Advertiser, May 16, 2004 By Dr. Ania Wieczorek Dr. Ania Wieczorek is an agricultural biotechnology educator at the University of Hawai'i's College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources. As an agricultural biotechnology educator with the University of Hawai'i, I feel compelled to respond to the May 10 commentary by Bill Freese. I am paid with public funds and employed at a public institution, and I have the interests of the citizens of Hawai'i foremost in my mind when I address issues related to my work. It is thus of concern to me that Mr. Freese, who does not live here and whose background is not in agriculture, makes a number of erroneous statements regarding agricultural biotechnology in Hawai'i. I believe that Mr. Freese means well, but his article includes misinformation that requires a response. I must first note that the College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources is dedicated to serving the needs of all Hawai'i's farmers by investigating all forms of technology, from organic agriculture to genetic engineering. Second, it is not true that most biotech crops in Hawai'i are experimental; rather, Hawai'i's principal genetically engineered crop is seed corn that is sent to the Mainland for field corn production.

27. BIO Statement On 2003 Planting Estimates For Biotechnology Crops BIO Statement on 2003 Planting Estimates for biotechnology crops. Print This Story Email This Story Save this Link View PR Newswire s RSS Feed http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&STORY=/www/story/03-31-200

28. FAQs Seed Contamination Frequently asked questions faq about crop seed contamination. the contaminationof seeds with genes from those few kinds of biotechnology crops that are http://www.ucsusa.org/food_and_environment/biotechnology/page.cfm?pageID=1339

29. September 2002 biotechnology crops have cost the United States millions of dollars and have notdelivered the economic benefits biotech proponents claim, says the UK Soil http://www.whybiotech.com/index.asp?id=3096

30. Food And Agricultural Biotechnology Initiatives: Strengthening Science-Based Reg before new agricultural biotechnology crops or products are introduced intothe food supply and will propose that submitted information and the agency’s http://clinton4.nara.gov/WH/EOP/OSTP/html/0058.html

T H E W H I T E H O U S E Food and Agricultural Biotechnology Initiatives: Strengthening Science-Based Regulation Help Site Map Text Only CLINTON ADMINISTRATION AGENCIES ANNOUNCE FOOD AND AGRICULTURAL BIOTECHNOLOGY INITIATIVES: STRENGTHENING SCIENCE-BASED REGULATION AND CONSUMER ACCESS TO INFORMATION May 3, 2000 Agricultural biotechnology holds enormous promise for improving the productivity and environmental sustainability of food and fiber production. In order to secure that bright future, the Clinton Administration is taking steps today to further our long-standing goal of sound science regulation and improved access to information. These steps are intended to build consumer confidence, ensure that regulations keep pace with the latest scientific and market developments and provide that voluntary product claims, such as labels, relating to biotechnology are truthful and not misleading. The Federal Government Has a Strong Regulatory System for Agricultural Biotechnology, a Sector That Holds Enormous Economic and Environmental Promise. The U.S. regulatory approach to agricultural biotechnology applies principles of sound science to ensure that there are no unacceptable human health and environmental risks associated with the use of these crops and that they are safe to enter into commerce. This system, encompassing the food safety and environmental regulations of the Department of Agriculture, Food and Drug Administration, and Environmental Protection Agency, has resulted in rigorous scientific review of products, while providing a predictable regulatory environment that fosters scientific advancement and product innovation.

31. AgBioForum 2(3&4): Ten Reasons Why Biotechnology Will Be Important To The Develo The argument that biotechnology crops have been commercialized without biotechnology crops and foods have been massively tested over the years both in http://www.agbioforum.org/v2n34/v2n34a04-mcgloughlin.htm

Back Issues Index Ten Reasons Why Biotechnology Will Be Important To The Developing World Martina McGloughlin University of California, Davis The objective in this article is to challenge misconceptions often put forward about the technologies of biotechnology. In particular, I challenge many of the arguments put forward by Altieri and Rosset in their paper published in this issue of AgBioForum . My main conclusion is that biotechnology will be very important to the developing world in the next 50 years. Key words: biotechnology; Green Revolution; benefits; productivity gains; food safety; environmental risk. My objective in this article is to challenge misconceptions often put forward about biotechnology. Within this context I challenge many of Altieri and Rosset's arguments which are not generally supported by existing scientific evidence. I follow their numbering of arguments to facilitate point-by-point comparisons. The argument that hunger is a complex socioeconomic phenomenon, tied to lack of resources to grow or buy food, is correct. Equally correct is the argument that existing food supplies could adequately feed the world population. But how food and other resources (e.g., land, capital) are distributed among individuals, regions, or the various nations is determined by the complex interaction of market forces and institutions around the world. Unless our civic societies can come up quickly with an economic system that allocates resources more equitably and The assertion that most innovations in biotechnology are

32. The Sydney Morning Herald India, Colombia and Honduras grew biotechnology crops on a large scale for the Soy, corn, canola and cotton were the only four biotechnology crops grown http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/01/20/1042911321307.html

@import url("http://smh.com.au/css/smh.css"); @import url("http://fdimages.fairfax.com.au/cui/netstrip-20050427.css"); NEWS MYCAREER DOMAIN DRIVE ... register Register now - It's FREE! Already registered? Login below if you have a Fairfax Digital username, or have registered for The Sydney Morning Herald, The Age, RugbyHeaven, or Realfooty. Username: Password: Forgotten your password? Note! You do not need to login every time you visit, provided your browser accepts cookies. More About registration: Why register? Help-FAQ's Contact us Not yet registered? You are now required to register for full access to The Sydney Morning Herald. Please fill out the short form below to register. Contact us if you are blind or vision impaired. Indicates required information Step 1: Create your account Create a Username: Minimum 4 characters. No spaces allowed. You can use your email address. Create a Password: Minimum 4 characters. No spaces allowed. Case sensitive (a is different from A) Confirm Password: Email Address: You will not be spammed as a result of registering with us. More Email Format: HTML (with graphics) Plain Text Step 2: Tell us about yourself First Name: Last Name: Age Range: Please select Under 18 65 and over Gender: Female Male Region: Please select Australia New Zealand (incl. Pacific Islands)

33. White House Press Release: Clinton Administration Agencies Announce Food And Agr The US regulatory approach to agricultural biotechnology applies principles days before new agricultural biotechnology crops or products are introduced http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~lrd/whbio53.html

May 3, 2000 CLINTON ADMINISTRATION AGENCIES ANNOUNCE FOOD AND AGRICULTURAL BIOTECHNOLOGY INITATIVES: STRENGTHENING SCIENCE-BASED REGULATION AND CONSUMER ACCESS TO INFORMATION This is a mirror of the White House press release, May 3, 2000, from the White House Briefing Room Home

34. Biotechnology Industry - Fighting Genetically Modified Food Motivated individuals are destroying test crops and lobbying against the rightdirection towards encouraging public acceptance of biotechnology crops. http://biotech.about.com/library/weekly/aa_fightingfood.htm

zJs=10 zJs=11 zJs=12 zJs=13 zc(5,'jsc',zJs,9999999,'') About Business Biotech / Biomedical Applications ... Agriculture Biotechnology Industry - Fighting Genetically Modified Food Business Biotech / Biomedical Essentials Mini MBA in Biotechnology ... Help zau(256,140,140,'el','http://z.about.com/0/ip/417/C.htm','');w(xb+xb+' ');zau(256,140,140,'von','http://z.about.com/0/ip/496/7.htm','');w(xb+xb); FREE Newsletter Sign Up Now for the Biotech / Biomedical newsletter! See Online Courses Search Biotech / Biomedical Fighting Genetically Modified Food Some opponents of genetically modified foods appear to be willing to develop any argument necessary to oppose these products. As data demonstrating the safety of GM foods progresses, opponents are forced to modify their arguments. Examples include raising concerns that DNA surrounding genes might possibly cause serious health and environmental problems. Ironically, there is more reason to believe that the DNA surrounding genes is inert. Public resistance is motivating companies to isolate agricultural biotechnology business units from other activities, refuse to publicly disclose the locations of test crops, and refine safety protocols. While public awareness of safety issues in agricultural biotechnology is promoting development of regulatory guidelines, it is important for safety advocates to play a supportive role lest they find themselves ignored. Because consumers are unlikely to appreciate the contribution of crops with indirect benefits, such as herbicide resistant crops that reduce production costs and prevent herbicide-related environmental damage, there has been a trend towards development of crops with direct benefits. Plants which serve visible needs, such as improved nutrition, are a step in the right direction towards encouraging public acceptance of biotechnology crops.

35. Decade Of Biotechnology Plant biotechnology crops have a solid record of human health and environmental Research on new plant biotechnology crops promises to offer additional http://www.teachingscience.org/biotech/teachscience.nsf/share_facts.htm

Proven Benefits Safety Record Benefits Drive Adoption Future Benefits ... References Share the Facts Over the past decade farmers around the world have planted more than one billion acres of crops improved with plant biotechnology traits.  Farmers choose to plant biotech crops due to the proven benefits they provide.  Plant biotechnology crops have a solid record of human health and environmental safety.  Research on new plant biotechnology crops promises to offer additional benefits for farmers, consumers and the environment.  These topics are addressed in the communication materials found on this website. "share the facts!" Proven Benefits Farmers Choose Biotech Crops Significant Economic and Environmental Benefits Benefits Extend to Developing Countries Safety Track Record and Benefits Safety Affirmed by the Experts History and Scope of Use Evidence of Human and Environmental Safety Benefits Benefits Drive Adoption Global Adoption over Nine Years Adoption of Biotech Crops in Developing Countries One Billion Acres in 2005 Future Benefits Future Benefits for Farmers, Consumers and the Environment

36. AMSEED - AMERICAN SEED TRADE ASSOCIATION the global adoption of biotechnology crops is a phenomenal success story.Led by the United States, six biotechnology crops are now being planted by http://www.amseed.com/newsDetail.asp?id=87

37. Yesterday's Press Release before new agricultural biotechnology crops or products are introduced intothe food supply and will propose that submitted information and the agency s http://www.oznet.ksu.edu/biotech/Web Links Folder/PressReleases.htm

May 3, 2000 CLINTON ADMINISTRATION AGENCIES ANNOUNCE FOOD AND AGRICULTURAL BIOTECHNOLOGY INITIATIVES: STRENGTHENING SCIENCE-BASED REGULATION AND CONSUMER ACCESS TO INFORMATION

38. Comparative Environmental Impacts Of Biotechnology Crops Impacts of Biotechnologyderived and Traditional Soybean, Corn, and Cotton Crops and the impact of biotechnology-derived crops on US agriculture. http://thesoydailyclub.com/thesoydailybackissues/usbbios6272002.asp

www.thesoydaily.com © 2000 - 2005 The Soy Daily™ PAGE ONE - (HOME) ARCHIVES ADVERTISE NEW! ... TELL A FRIEND WWW The Soy Daily™ Comparative Environmental Impacts of Biotechnology-derived and Traditional Soybean, Corn, and Cotton Crops Author and Farmer Biographies Janet Carpenter Allan Felsot, Ph.D. Timothy Goode Michael Hammig, Ph.D. ... Richard Borgsmiller United Soybean Board (USB) Chairman Criss Davis United Soybean Board (USB) Trade Analysis Chair Jerry Slocum United Soybean Board (USB) International Marketing Chair Author Biographies Janet Carpenter National Center for Food and Agricultural Policy Research Associate Since joining the National Center for Food and Agricultural Policy (NCFAP) in 1997, Janet Carpenter has conducted research on the impact of the U.S. ban on methyl bromide, and the risks and benefits of agricultural biotechnology. She has made presentations at professional conferences and symposia, and has testified before a congressional subcommittee. The focus of her current research is on the impact that biotechnology has had on agriculture in the U.S. Ms. Carpenter received her B.A. in economics from the University of Wisconsin-Madison and her M.S. in Agricultural and Resource Economics from the University of Maryland-College Park.

39. How To Approach The Regulatory Conundrum? 1 Although the next generation of biotechnology crops includes the production ofdrugs and the delivery of vaccines, the drugs and vaccines produced will be http://www.cspinet.org/biotech/nabc_final.html

How to Approach the Regulatory Conundrum? By Gregory A. Jaffe, Director, Biotechnology Project Today, farmers and the environment benefit from the first generation of agricultural biotechnology crops. The biotechnology industry and academics trumpet the next generation of genetically engineered ("GE") crops, such as more nutritious foods and plants used to produce pharmaceuticals, antibodies and industrial enzymes. If those crops are commercialized, is the current regulatory structure in the United States up to the task of ensuring that those products are safe for humans and the environment? This paper analyzes the ability of the regulatory system to adequately regulate the next generation of agricultural biotechnology products. It concludes that without additional legal authority and stronger oversight, the US regulatory system cannot ensure that only agricultural biotechnology products that are safe for humans and the environment are commercialized. I. What the Future Holds? Virtually every week there is media coverage about new applications for agricultural biotechnology. Some applications add new genes to crops to make food more nutritious. For example, in the past year, the press has reported on the following potential products: Scientists have inserted two genes from a daffodil and one from a bacterium into rice plants to create golden rice. That rice produces beta-carotene, which the human body turns into vitamin A.

40. Using Agrobiodiversity Through Biotechnology: Crops - Tropicla Fruits CIAT Home Using Agrobiodiversity through Biotechnology keeping in mindthat CIAT is adopting tropical fruits as part of its mandated crops, http://www.ciat.cgiar.org/biotechnology/crops_tropical_fruits.htm

Products Databases on Plant Genetic Resources All Biotechnology- related Products Research Themes Genetic Transformation Cassava Propagation and Conservation Genomics ... Technological Transfer and Participatory Research Crops Rice Beans Cassava Tropical Fruits Information Resources Biotechnology: Tools for Conserving and Using Biodiversity, a Background Document Cassava Biotechnology Network (CBN) Training and Events ... Publications About Us Project Description Highlights Our Team ... Using Agrobiodiversity through Biotechnology Highlights of our project activities Visit the CIAT Project Web site: Tropical Fruits Naranjilla ( Solanum quitoense ): Developing Methodologies for Its ... Multiplication, Plant Regeneration, and Genetic Transformation

A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P  Q  R  S  T  U  V  W  X  Y  Z

Page 2     21-40 of 104    Back | 1  | 2  | 3  | 4  | 5  | 6  | Next 20