Home  - Basic_W - Washington Education Regulations

Books Baby Camera Phones Computers Games DVD Electronics Kitchen Magazines Music Garden Software Tools Toys Video Apparel & Accessories Jewelry & Watches Musical Instruments Health & Personal Care Beauty Sports & Outdoors Office Products

e99.com Bookstore

Images

Newsgroups

41-60 of 96    Back | 1  | 2  | 3  | 4  | 5  | Next 20

A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P  Q  R  S  T  U  V  W  X  Y  Z

Washington Education Regulations:     more books (100)

Education groups seek delay in Sevis-fee implementation.(dateline Washington)(Student and Exchange Visitor Information System)(U. S. House of Representatives ... An article from: Community College Week by Kristin Bagnato, 2004-06-07 Proposal takes aim at for-profit schools: Education Department planning regulations to restrict the institutions' access to federal financial aid programs.(washington ... from: Diverse Issues in Higher Education by Charles Dervarics, 2010-06-10 Foreign-student Visa process clumsy and cumbersome, educators say.(dateline Washington): An article from: Community College Week by Garry Boulard, 2004-10-25 Washington Commentary - New ESEA Extends Choice To School Officials.(Elementary and Secondary Education Act ): An article from: Phi Delta Kappan by Anne C. Lewis, 2002-02-01 Progress report.(washington update): An article from: Diverse Issues in Higher Education by Joyce Jones, 2010-09-30 Minority-serving institutions seek long-term funding increases: advocates seek additional funding through a couple of bills under consideration in Congress.(washington ... from: Diverse Issues in Higher Education by Charles Dervarics, 2009-09-03 Community colleges to benefit from new higher ed bill: ambitious higher education legislation is loaded with student aid, community college improvements.(washington ... from: Diverse Issues in Higher Education by Charles Dervarics, 2009-09-17 Republican education plan focuses on rising college costs: Sen. John McCain and party officials call for more transparency and restraint in college spending.(washington ... from: Diverse Issues in Higher Education by Gregory A. Patterson, 2008-10-02 Community colleges seek billions to stave off job cuts.(washington update): An article from: Diverse Issues in Higher Education by Charles Dervarics, 2010-05-13 Coalition launches advertising, lobbying campaign for federal student aid.(Washington Update): An article from: Black Issues in Higher Education House bill could eliminate restriction on proprietary schools' access to federal student aid.(College Access and Opportunity Act)(WASHINGTON UPDATE): An article from: Black Issues in Higher Education by M.H. Miller, 2005-04-07 Report: IRS privacy laws restrict education department and colleges from verifying financial aid applications.(dateline washington): An article from: Community College Week by Charles Pekow, 2006-12-04 New education funding, programs win congressional approval.(dateline Washington): An article from: Community College Week by Charles Pekow, 2007-08-27 Congress clears Education Department budget with funding increases: minority-serving institutions will benefit from increases and earmarks.(washington ... from: Diverse Issues in Higher Education by Charles Dervarics, 2010-01-21

lists with details

41. Interfaith Alliance Comments On Dept. Of Education Regulations - Interfaith Alli
    of the revised regulations, the Department of education is now requiring 1331 H Street, NW washington, DC 20005 (11th Floor) Phone 202.639.6370  
    http://www.interfaithalliance.org/site/pp.asp?c=8dJIIWMCE&b=483453

42. Words From Washington, April 11, 2005, Vol. 109 No. 6 - American Foundation For
    Did you receive this copy of Words from washington from a friend? Department of education Announces Meetings on IDEA Proposed regulations  
    http://www.afb.org/Section.asp?SectionID=&DocumentID=2729

43. Harvard Summer School Regulations
    The Harvard University Summer School 2005 regulations. and Privacy Act Office, Department of education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW, washington, DC 20202.  
    http://www.summer.harvard.edu/2005/policy/regulations.jsp

44. [Federal Register October 31, 2002 (Volume 67, Number 211
    (8th Floor), washington, DC 20006. Telephone (202) 5027815. These regulations will affect certain institutions of higher education that participate in  
    http://www.securityoncampus.org/congress/cscpa/fr31oc02-16.html
    
    Extractions: http://www.ed.gov/legislation/FedRegister . To use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at this site. If you have questions about using PDF, call the U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO), toll free, at 1-888-293-6498; or in the Washington, DC, area at (202) 512-1530. You may also view this document in PDF format at the following site: http://ifap.ed.gov . Note: The official version of this document is the document published in the Federal Register. Free Internet access to the official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of Federal Regulations is available on GPO Access at: http:// www.access.gpo.gov/nara/index.html Filed ; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4000-01-P

45. Illinois Loop: Regulations
    washington will be forced either to allow the states great leeway in how they 846 pages of New York State education law; 720 pages of regulations from  
    http://www.illinoisloop.org/regulations.html
    
    Extractions: NCLB: The Dangers of Centralized Education Policy, Executive Summary by Lawrence A. Uzzell, Cato Institute, Policy Analysis no. 544 May 31, 2005. "The NCLB statute is a reform strategy at war with itself. It virtually guarantees massive evasion of its own intent, ordering state education agencies to do things that they mostly don't want to do. Washington will be forced either to allow the states great leeway in how they implement NCLB or to make NCLB more detailed, prescriptive, and top-heavy. If Washington chooses the former, the statute might as well not exist; if the latter, federal policymakers will increasingly resemble Soviet central planners trying to improve economic performance by micromanaging decisions from Moscow. NCLB may end up giving us the worst possible scenario: unconstitutional consolidation of power in Washington over the schools, with that power being used to promote mediocrity rather than excellence."

46. Article 8, Administrative Regulations - Judicial Affairs And Student Advocacy, U
    Administrative regulations for the rules and regulations page. US Department of education 600 Independence Avenue, SW washington, DC 202024605  
    http://www.ub-judiciary.buffalo.edu/art7.shtml
    
    Extractions: A. University disciplinary proceedings may be instituted against a student charged with violation of a law which is also a violation of this Student Code, for example, if both violations result from the same factual situation, without regard to the pendency of civil litigation in court or criminal arrest and prosecution. Proceedings under this Student Code may be carried out prior to, simultaneously with, or following civil or criminal proceedings off-campus. B. When a student is charged by federal, state or local authorities with a violation of law, the University will not request or agree to special consideration for that individual because of his or her status as a student. If the alleged offense is also the subject of a proceeding before a judicial body under the Student Code, however, the University may advise off-campus authorities of the existence of the Student Code and of how such matters will be handled internally within the University community. The University will cooperate fully with law enforcement and other agencies in the enforcement of criminal law on campus and in the conditions imposed by criminal courts for the rehabilitation of student violators. Individual students, faculty and staff members, acting in their personal capacities, remain free to interact with governmental representatives as they deem appropriate.

47. State FBA Stats & Regs
    California Department of education regulations are located in Title 5. washington Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction  
    http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~proj5csd/law_state.html
    
    Extractions: Functional Behavioral Assessment NOTE: The information included herein has not been reviewed by, and therefore has neither been endorsed nor denied endorsement by the U.S. Department of Education. Thus, this information should be considered the opinion of the authors only, and not that of the Department of Education. Some of the links on this page require Adobe Acrobat Reader to view. Click here to download the latest version if you do not have it. The Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA 2004), 20 U.S.C.  1400 et seq., provides federal funds to assist state and local agencies in educating disabled children. IDEA 2004 conditions the receipt of such funds upon a state's compliance with certain goals and procedures. State legislatures and departments of education have enacted statutes and promulgated regulations respectively to ensure compliance with IDEA 2004 requirements. IDEA 2004 and its implementing regulations require schools to conduct functional behavioral assessments (FBAs) but provide little to no guideance on what an FBA is or how to conduct one. State laws and regulations are filling the gap. To learn about your state's FBA requirements, follow the links below and contact your State Department of Education directly. Click here to view a summary of state FBA laws (18.0KB Excel format).

48. Kepler College Located In Lynnwood, Washington
    Ms Shalala’s presentation to the National education Association was truly through the many obstacles of state and federal education regulations,  
    http://www.kepler.edu/commencement/CTebbs.html
    
    Extractions: Contact info@kepler.edu for more information or call (425) 673-4292 Carol A. Tebbs, M.A. Kepler board, faculty, families and friends, Welcome to this milestone event, the first commencement of Bachelor and Associate of Arts degree candidates from Kepler College. Now that you have experienced some of Kepler College through our promotional DVD, you can see that our students span a wide range of ages, represent three continents, and many more nationalities, ethnicities and cultures. We have students from Japan to Mexico, from Canada to Sweden, and in the U S, from New York to California, from Florida to Washington and everywhere in between. Distance learning with a six-day symposium each term expands educational opportunity to everyone, especially to those living in remote locations or to others who balance education with work and family responsibilities. The Founding Board members, of Kepler College were extremely bold pioneers! They persevered through the many obstacles of state and federal education regulations, to apply for Bachelor and Master degree authorizations for programs with curriculum including comparative astrology. Though integrated with traditional subjects such as math, science, history and literature, such a proposal to include anything about astrology would have been heresy in earlier times.

49. NEA: Washington Shortchanges Children And Public Schools Across The Nation
    Proposed FY 06 federal education funding by State Impact of costly federal regulations In FY 2005, Connecticut received $68.2 million less than it  
    http://www.nea.org/lawsuit/statefact.html
    
    Extractions: The law's commendable goals of high standards and accountability held the promise of helping every child receive a great public education, regardless of his or her family income, language spoken at home, or school funding level. But for schools across the nation, the promise has gone unfulfilled for 48 million public school children . The escalating bureaucracy and paperwork imposed by the law are taking a toll on the nation's more than 14,000 public school districts , because Washington is not honoring its promise to pay for its regulations. In FY 2005, the nation's schools received $9.8 billion less than they would have if No Child Left Behind was funded at the level Congress promised in the law. Under President Bush's proposed budget for 2006, the nation's schools will receive $12 billion less than what Congress authorized when the federal law was enacted.

50. NEA: NEA Files Lawsuit Challenging NCLB Unfunded Mandates
    for Not Paying for education regulations washington Today, a diverse network of school districts, the National education Association (NEA) and several  
    http://www.nea.org/lawsuit/nr050420.html
    
    Extractions: for Not Paying for Education Regulations WASHINGTON - Today, a diverse network of school districts, the National Education Association (NEA) and several state education associations filed the first-ever national lawsuit to force the Bush Administration to pay the costs of its own rules and regulations under the No Child Left Behind law. "Today we're standing up for children, whose parents are saying, 'No more' to costly federal regulations that drain money from classrooms and spend it on paperwork, bureaucracy and big testing companies," said NEA President Reg Weaver. "The principle of the law is simple; if you regulate, you have to pay." The plaintiffs represent several school districts in Vermont, Texas and Michigan as well as the nation's largest teacher's organization. These groups say they are filing the suit because the Administration has not heeded its own demands of accountability which states: "Nothing in this Act shall be construed to authorize an officer or employee of the Federal Government to mandate, direct, or control a State, local education agency, or school's curriculum, program of instruction, or allocation of State or local resources, or mandate a State or any subdivision thereof to spend any funds or incur any costs not paid for under this Act."

51. NCLB: Summaries
    Summaries and Analyses of Legislation, regulations, and Guidance, No Child Left An article from washington Monthly on the capacity of state education  
    http://www.ccsso.org/federal_programs/NCLB/3347.cfm
    
    Extractions: select Alabama Alaska American Samoa Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District of Col... DoDEA Florida Georgia Guam Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Northern Marian... Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Puerto Rico Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virgin Islands Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming

52. Task Force To Examine The Implications Of Special Ed Regulations
    washington, DC, February 17, 2004 — The Council of Chief State School Officers The task force will work closely with the US Department of education (ED)  
    http://www.ccsso.org/Whats_New/Press_Releases/4084.cfm
    
    Extractions: New Publications select Alabama Alaska American Samoa Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District of Col... DoDEA Florida Georgia Guam Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Northern Marian... Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Puerto Rico Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virgin Islands Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Washington, DC, February 17, 2004 The Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO) announces the members of its newly created Task Force on Special Education. This task force has been assembled in an effort to better understand the implications of federal regulations and other legislation aimed at helping students with disabilities learn to their potential, namely the Individuals with Disabilities Act (IDEA) and No Child Left Behind (NCLB). “Educators in every state in our nation want to improve the learning outcomes for student with disabilities,” said Terry Bergeson, Washington State’s Superintendent of Public Instruction and chair of the CCSSO Task Force. “We must take advantage of this opportunity to move away from our heavy emphasis on compliance to a stronger focus on higher learning and achievement levels for all students with special needs.”

53. U.S. Dept. Of Education Seeking Comments On IDEA Regulations
    US Dept. of education Seeking Comments on IDEA regulations. January 25, 2004 washington, DC 2/24 Academy for educational Development Academy Hall  
    http://www.naswdc.org/advocacy/updates/2004/012504.asp
    
    Extractions: NASW Homepage Government Relations Update January 25, 2004 The U.S. Department of Education is soliciting comments and recommendations from the public prior to their developing and publishing proposed regulations to implement programs under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), which was reauthorized in late 2004. These comments should address changes that you believe are needed to clarify a provision in the new law or to facilitate its implementation. Comments and recommendations are due by February 28, 2005. To read the official request for comments in the Federal Register, please refer to — http://www.regulations.gov/freddocs/04-28503.htm . For additional information, you may contact the Office for Special Education and Rehabilitative Services at 202-245-7468. If using TDD, call 1-800-877-8339. Comments can be e-mailed to comments@ed.gov

54. Education And The Law
    Kentucky Administrative regulations, title 783 (Workforce Development Cabinet Board for washington Revised Code, title 28C (Vocational education)  
    http://www.lectlaw.com/inll/99.htm

55. EPA - Mid-Atlantic Region - Lead In Washington, DC Drinking Water - Laws/Regulat
    regulations. EPA recognized that lead can leach from plumbing products 141.85 – public education and supplemental monitoring requirements 7 pages, 67K  
    http://www.epa.gov/dclead/sdwa.htm
    
    Extractions: Mid-Atlantic Region: Lead in Washington, DC Drinking Water Serving Delaware, District of Columbia, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and West Virginia Contact Us Print Version Search: EPA Home Region 3 Region 3 Drinking Water Region 3 Lead in DC Drinking Water ... Related Links The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) is the main federal law that ensures the quality of Americans' drinking water. Under SDWA, EPA sets standards for drinking water quality and oversees the states, localities, and water suppliers who implement those standards. Learn more about how the EPA oversees drinking water standards in the District of Columbia EPA recognized that lead can leach from plumbing products into the water being distributed by public water suppliers for drinking. EPA authorities, however, are limited to requiring public water suppliers to meet the regulations governing treated water quality distributed via the public system. These authorities do not allow EPA to require homeowners to replace their plumbing systems if they contain lead. To reduce consumers' lead exposure through tap water, EPA has used its available authorities to require public water suppliers to treat their water to make it as minimally corrosive as possible to metals in their customers' plumbing systems. These treatment requirements were promulgated in EPA's Lead and Copper Rule (LCR) on June 7, 1991.

56. Regulations At Evergreen
    Evergreen complies with the Federal Family education Rights and Privacy Act of washington state law requires the Master in Teaching program to not only  
    http://www.evergreen.edu/mit/program/regulations.htm
    
    Extractions: Quick Links Apply to Evergreen About Evergreen Inside Evergreen Pick Your Program Admissions Alumni Bookstore Campus Calendar Campus Life Campus Tour Catalog Directories Employment Enrollment Services Financial Aid Gateway Giving Graduate Studies Registration Public Service Centers Scholarships Studies Site Index Applying to the Program Costs Program Description Faculty and Staff ... Information Sessions Cohort Web Sites Guidebook Newsletters Placement File Information ... Web Sites of Interest Adding Endorsements Professional Certificate Program Special Education Sequence The Equal Opportunity Policy of The Evergreen State College expressly prohibits discrimination against any person on the basis of race, sex, age, religion, national origin, marital status, sexual orientation, Vietnam-era or disabled veteran status or the presence of any sensory, physical or mental disability unless based upon a bona fide occupational qualification. Applicants have the right to appeal admissions decisions if all requirements have been met and there is factual evidence that not all pertinent information was considered, or there is clear evidence of discrimination.

57. Edequity On Line: Federal Register Notice Regarding Title IX Re
    education regulations. Title IX prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex in PO Box 65960, washington, DC 200356560, fax (202) 307-0595, phone (202)  
    http://www2.edc.org/WomensEquity/edequity/hypermail/0910.html

58. Western Journal Of Applied Forestry: Washington State's Forest Regulations: Fami
    Full text of the article, washington State s Forest regulations Family NIPF use of landowner assistance and education programs in washington State.  
    http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa4006/is_200507/ai_n14776595/pg_3
    
    Extractions: Academy of Marketing Science Review Accounting Historians Journal, The Accounting History AgExporter ... View all titles in this topic Hot New Articles by Topic Automotive Sports Top Articles Ever by Topic Automotive Sports Washington State's Forest Regulations: Family Forest Owners' Understanding and Opinions Western Journal of Applied Forestry Jul 2005 by Creighton, Janean H Baumgartner, David M Conclusion A knowledge gap exists within the private forest landowner community in Washington State with regards to some state and federal environmental regulations. While Washington State has one of the most stringent set of FPR in the United States, only 30% of landowners seem to be aware of them. The larger-acreage landowners with longer ownership tenures appear to be more familiar with forest regulations than newer smaller-acreage landowners. Past studies have suggested that larger-acreage ownerships are more likely to actively manage their forests for timber and other wood products than are smaller ownerships (Blatner et al. 1991, Jones et al. 1995) and should be more knowledgeable about regulations (Johnson et al. 1997). However, recent studies have suggested that small-acreage landowners are just as likely as large landowners to take part in active forest management after participating in forestry education and assistance programs (Creighton et al. 2002, Baumgartner et al. 2003).

59. Final Report On Negotiated Regulations For Accreditation Issues In HEA 98
    washington Higher education Secretariat. From, Judith Eaton On June 25, the US Secretary of education proposed new regulations on accreditation.  
    http://www.chea.org/Government/HEA/99_07Final.cfm
    
    Extractions: From: Judith Eaton Re: Final Report on Negotiated Regulations for Accreditation Issues in HEA 98 Date: July 27, 1999 Introduction On June 25, the US Secretary of Education proposed new regulations on accreditation. After six months of complex negotiations, a forty-member team of federal officials and non-federal negotiators reached a final agreement on May 27 on revisions of the federal regulations on ac-creditation. This follows the enactment in October 1998 of the new law amending the Higher Education Act (HEA 98). CHEA is providing this summary of the main regulatory provisions and their implications. CHEA, several accreditation organizations and the major national higher education associations were all participants in these negotiations. The Process The new proposals, formally known as a "Notice of Proposed Rule Making" (NPRM), represent two types of revisions. First, they alter the current accreditation regulations to implement the October 1998 changes in law made by the HEA Amendments of 1998. Second, they rewrite the present regulations into "Plain Language," a government-wide reform to make all regulations easier for the public to use. Both types of revisions are incorporated into a single text. The NPRM has two parts, a "Preamble," which states the US Department of Education (ED) explanation of the proposal, and the actual proposed regulatory language.

60. CHEA • Government Relations
    Final Report on Negotiated regulations for Accreditation Issues in HEA 98 July 27, 1999 washington Higher education Secretariat http//www.whes.org/  
    http://www.chea.org/Government/index.asp
    
    Extractions: Provides a comparison of current law related to accreditation provisions of the Higher Education Act with the reauthorization bill passed by the House Committee on Education and the Workforce (HR 609) on July 22, 2005 and the reauthorization bill passed by the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee (S 1614) on September 8, 2005. Number 25, September 6, 2005 Provides a comparison of the accreditation provisions of HR 609, the major reauthorization bill passed by the House Committee on Education and the Workforce, with current law. Also provides preliminary information on the accreditation provisions of the reauthorization bill introduced by the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee. Number 24, August 2, 2005

A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P  Q  R  S  T  U  V  W  X  Y  Z

41-60 of 96    Back | 1  | 2  | 3  | 4  | 5  | Next 20