Home  - Basic_C - Canadian Supreme Court

Books Baby Camera Phones Computers Games DVD Electronics Kitchen Magazines Music Garden Software Tools Toys Video Apparel & Accessories Jewelry & Watches Musical Instruments Health & Personal Care Beauty Sports & Outdoors Office Products

e99.com Bookstore

Images

Newsgroups

41-60 of 113    Back | 1  | 2  | 3  | 4  | 5  | 6  | Next 20

A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P  Q  R  S  T  U  V  W  X  Y  Z

Canadian Supreme Court:     more books (69)

U.S. Supreme Court declines to review judgment that Canadian company's BlackBerry wireless communicator infringes U.S. patents of plaintiff though its ... An article from: International Law Update Mr. Justice David Brown.(Ontario Supreme Court appoints David M. Brown): An article from: Catholic Insight by Rory Leishman, 2006-11-01 We don't understand: do you have our Supreme Court decision?: An article from: Windspeaker by Unavailable, 2009-12-01 Did Canada vote against both Liberals and the Supreme Court of Canada?(COLUMNIST): An article from: Catholic Insight by Herman Goodden, 2006-05-01 Supreme Court rules seizure of band's funds legal.(news): An article from: Wind Speaker by Paul Barnsley, 2007-02-01 Court urges government action.(ruling from Supreme Court of Canada on Aboriginal rights): An article from: Wind Speaker by Paul Barnsley, 2003-10-01 In patent action by U.S. drug company, Supreme Court of Canada decides whether to allow appeal of Canadian drug company from order issued under recent ... An article from: International Law Update Rejecting defenses of fraud, ordre public, and denial of justice, Supreme Court of Canada rules 6 to 3 that Canadian courts should enforce substantial ... An article from: International Law Update Brian Dickson: A Judge's Journey (Osgoode Society for Canadian Legal History) by Kent Roach, Robert J. Sharpe, 2003-11-20 Charting new territory? Fifteen years of search and seizure decisions by the Supreme Court of Canada, 1982-1997.: An article from: American Review of Canadian Studies by C.L. Ostberg, 2000-03-22 B.C. government attempts to abandon court fights.(news): An article from: Wind Speaker by Paul Barnsley, 2005-04-01 M vs H does not affect marriage, yet.(ruling in Canadian gay rights case)(Brief Article): An article from: Catholic Insight Canadian Father Jailed for Murder of His Disabled Daughter.(Robert Latimer)(Brief Article): An article from: National Right to Life News by Liz Townsend, 2001-02-01 The Vaid case and the protection of parliamentary employees against human rights discrimination.(Towards a Theory of Parliamentary Privilege in Canadian ... article from: Canadian Parliamentary Review by Serge Joyal, 2005-12-22

lists with details

41. Newsbrief: Canadian Supreme Court To Rule Next Week On Key Marijuana Cases
    Newsbrief canadian supreme court to Rule Next Week on Key Marijuana Cases 12/19/03.Will it be a jolly green Christmas or a stocking full of ashes?  
    http://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle/316/keycases.shtml
    
    Extractions: Newsbrief: Canadian Supreme Court to Rule Next Week on Key Marijuana Cases Will it be a jolly green Christmas or a stocking full of ashes? Canadian cannabis consumers and advocates will find out on Tuesday, when the Canadian Supreme Court will announce its ruling in a trio of cases that have the potential to nullify the country's laws against marijuana possession. In an announcement sent out on its e-mail list, the court said it would rule on the cases at 9:45am on December 23. The appellants in all three cases, David Malmo-Levine, Victor Caine and Christopher Clay, were all found guilty of marijuana possession offenses. All three appealed their convictions, arguing the Canadian Charter of Rights prohibits the government from creating criminal penalties for marijuana possession. In recent years, Canadian marijuana policy has been in severe flux, with some Canadian courts briefly legalizing marijuana possession because of the government's failure to act to make medical marijuana available to patients. The government of recently retired former Prime Minister Jean Chretien, meanwhile, proceeded with a bill that would have decriminalized marijuana possession, but increased penalties for all but the smallest grow ops. That bill died when Chretien adjourned parliament last month, but as DRCNet reported last week, new Prime Minister Paul Martin has indicated he will reintroduce the bill. But all of that could be rendered moot by a favorable Supreme Court decision Tuesday. Stay tuned.

42. Canadian Supreme Court Upholds Marijuana Law -- Cannabis Battle Heads Back To Pa
    The Supreme Court of Canada ruled Tuesday that laws making marijuana possessiona criminal offense potentially punishable by jail time do not violate the  
    http://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle/317/canada.shtml
    
    Extractions: Canadian Supreme Court Upholds Marijuana Law Cannabis Battle Heads Back to Parliament The Supreme Court of Canada ruled Tuesday that laws making marijuana possession a criminal offense potentially punishable by jail time do not violate the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The ruling came in the conjoined cases of David Malmo-Levine, Chris Clay and Victor Caine, all of whom argued that the harmfulness of marijuana did not rise to a level that allowed the government to threaten their liberty and personal security through criminal sanctions. Instead, the court agreed with government lawyers, who argued that the laws should stand unless and until parliament decides to change them. "We conclude that it is within Parliament's legislative jurisdiction to criminalize the possession of marijuana, should it choose to do so," said the decision, co-written by Justices Charles Gonthier and Ian Binnie. "Equally, it is open to Parliament to decriminalize or otherwise modify any aspect of the marijuana laws that it no longer considers to be good public policy... The evidence indicates the existence of both use and misuse by chronic users and by vulnerable groups who cause harm to themselves," said the 6-3 opinion. "There is no free-standing constitutional right to smoke 'pot' for recreational purposes." Justice Louise Arbour

43. Michael Geist - Canadian Supreme Court Opens Up Second Copyright Balance
    MichaelGeists Home on the Web, canadian supreme court Opens Up Second CopyrightBalance.  
    http://www.michaelgeist.ca/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=597&Itemid=

44. The Zundel Case: The September 30 Canadian Supreme Court Decision
    The Supreme Court of Canada refused Thursday to hear Zundel s argument that Ernst and I have often talked about it that the canadian supreme court  
    http://www.rense.com/general57/zzun.htm
    
    Extractions: Good Morning from the Zundelsite: During this latest Zundel persecution bonanza, now projected to stretch into its third year, Canadian Zionist Jews have alternately gloated and yammered - gloated that they have their favorite villain finally securely in their clutches after having kidnapped him, and yammered that he is still putting up such a spirited fight, instead of cringing at their feet, mumbling his mea culpas, like everybody else. As part of his defiant struggle against the "security certificate" eyesore on a decrepit body politic, Ernst Zundel put three challenges to the Supreme Court of Canada. The first of these applications for leave, as it is called. was filed last May, meant to test the constitutionality of Canada's Secrecy Act. Will the Canadian Supreme Court really be willing to turn that country's Anglo-Saxon majesty of law - a system worth a thousand years of civilized, elegant refinement - over to Canada's bad-mannered spooks? The second challenge was meant to test the power of a judge who blatantly runs interference for CSIS in one such "security certificate" circus. Is there any legal recourse left to put some brakes on an abusive judge?

45. PNHP's Response To The Canadian Supreme Court Decision | Physicians For A Nation
    PNHP Statement on the canadian supreme court Decision on Private Insurance.On June 9, 2005, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that the Quebec government  
    http://www.pnhp.org/news/2005/june/pnhps_response_to_th.php
    
    Extractions: Only: News Publications Get the Facts Our Proposals Media Inquiries News and Updates Take Action Join PNHP About PNHP Other Links Skip over navigation Home PNHP's response to the Canadian Supreme Court decision document.write(""); PNHP Statement on the Canadian Supreme Court Decision on Private Insurance In both the United States and Canada, opponents of universal public programs of health insurance have used this decision to argue that private insurance provides a superior alternative to public insurance. Such arguments are fallacious and entirely unwarranted. Long queues (waiting lists for health care services) result from inadequate capacity of the health care delivery system, not from the method of paying for care. Canada suffers from an inadequate supply of MRI machines and a shortage of specialists and technicians in some fields. These shortages have resulted in queues for a few high technology interventions. The appropriate remedy is to increase capital investment in the capacity of the system, both in physical plants and equipment, and in human resources. In the effort to reduce queues to reasonable levels, it is crucial to avoid creating excess capacity in the system. Excess capacity results in over-utilization, which dramatically increases costs without a commensurate improvement in outcomes. Excessive interventions are sometimes even detrimental to health. Because of the dynamic nature of health care, not all capacity problems can be anticipated, and some queues are inevitable. An effective health care system monitors utilization and reacts with appropriate adjustments in capacity.

46. SUPREME COURT OF CANADA //
    Supreme Court of Canada dressed in red. canadian supreme court decisions are madeby people who are never questioned and dress up in red gowns.  
    http://jamesbredin.tripod.com/numberfour/id10.html
    
    Extractions: free hit counter Supreme Court of Canada dressed in red. Canadian Supreme Court decisions are made by people who are never questioned and dress up in red gowns. Supreme Court of Canada The Canadian Supreme Court base their decisions on a charter, That turns all the laws passed in Parliament into a nonstarter. They show how these appointed judges can make their own laws, And pronounce themselves omnipotent amid political applause. When these appointees are all dress up like Santa Clause, No prime minister has dared to use the notwithstanding clause, Appointees are never questioned bout their vested preferences, Special interests, prejudices or who made their secret references.

47. Leiter Reports: Canadian Supreme Court: Unconstitutional To Bar Private Health I
    canadian supreme court Unconstitutional to Bar Private Health Insurance inCertain Circumstances. The New York Times story is here.  
    http://leiterreports.typepad.com/blog/2005/06/canadian_suprem.html
    
    Extractions: Red Constantino Main The New York Times story is here . I would be interested in hearing from any of my many Canadian readersor others knowledgeable about the legal issues and the ramifications of the decisionon what this may mean for the future. Will this spell doom for Canada's national healthcare system? I have opened comments; no anonymous postings, of course. June 09, 2005 in Of Cultural Interest Permalink The quick response from our Prime Minister (Paul Martin) on the link below suggests that he (for what it is worth!) believes this decision will not undermine Canada’s public health-care system. But Canadians are unlikely to feel re-assured by Martin's saying this (given the current circus-like state of our politics!) http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20050609.wmartin0609/BNStory/National/

48. Canadian Supreme Court's Decision Against Canadian Farmer Percy Schmeiser Is An
    Home. canadian supreme court s Decision against Canadian Farmer Percy Schmeiseris an Attack on All Farmers. May 21, 2004. canadian supreme court s Decision  
    http://www.foodfirst.org/node/285
    
    Extractions: @import "misc/drupal.css"; @import "modules/taxonomy_context/taxonomy_context.css"; @import url(modules/event/event.css); @import "themes/chameleon/FoodFirstCorn/style.css"; About Us Publications Find It! Media ... Site Map Shopping Cart Our Bookstore Give feedback on our new look! Links Home May 21, 2004 May 21, 2004 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE (510) 654-4400, ext. 229 Canadian Supreme Court's Decision against Canadian Farmer Percy Schmeiser is an Attack on All Farmers Ruling Could Pave Way for More Lawsuits Against Farmers (Oakland, Calif)Food First/Institute for Food and Development Policy deplores the Canadian Supreme Court's decision finding that Canadian farmer Percy Schmeiser violated Monsanto's patent for genetically modified (GM) canola. Schmeiser, a long-time farmer of canola, has fought against Monsanto in Canadian courts for seven years. Although four of the nine judges disagreed, Monsanto and other agricultural biotechnology companies are likely to cite the Canadian case when they prosecute farmers for "stealing" crop varieties that the companies claim as their private property.

49. CIRPA: Canadian Supreme Court Refuses To Hear MP3 Levy Appeal
    canadian supreme court Refuses to Hear MP3 Levy Appeal. The Supreme Court ofCanada on July 28th refused to hear an appeal by the Canadian Private Copying  
    http://www.cirpa.ca/Page.asp?PageID=122&ContentID=824

50. Queer Day: News, Personals And More
    canadian supreme court to hear samesex pension case. Canada The Supreme Courtof Canada has agreed to weigh in on whether Ottawa will have to pay out  
    http://www.queerday.com/2005/jun/24/canadian_supreme_court_to_hear_samesex_pensi
    
    Extractions: Home About Queer Day About Philo Contact ... Terms of Service Today's Headlines Vermont: Free To Be, the University of Vermont's GLBT Alliance is proud to announce the fourth annual Translating Identity Conference at the University of Vermont. It's happening on February 25th and 26th and the free conference focusing on gender and gender identities is open to the public. California: The Pentagon's practice of prohibiting gays and lesbians from serving openly in the armed forces has turned out to be more of an embarassment for Americans than anything else. A new University of California poll found 24.2 percent embarrassed for the military, 17.5 percent said the policy made them proud, and 56 percent said it made no difference. (Thanks Michael)

51. Queer Day: News, Personals And More
    Azmi Jubran s ruling appealed to canadian supreme court. Canada The NorthVancouver school board wants to appeal April s BC Court of Appeal ruling in the  
    http://www.queerday.com/2005/jun/13/azmi_jubrans_ruling_appealed_to_canadian_sup
    
    Extractions: Home About Queer Day About Philo Contact ... Terms of Service Today's Headlines Vermont: Free To Be, the University of Vermont's GLBT Alliance is proud to announce the fourth annual Translating Identity Conference at the University of Vermont. It's happening on February 25th and 26th and the free conference focusing on gender and gender identities is open to the public. California: The Pentagon's practice of prohibiting gays and lesbians from serving openly in the armed forces has turned out to be more of an embarassment for Americans than anything else. A new University of California poll found 24.2 percent embarrassed for the military, 17.5 percent said the policy made them proud, and 56 percent said it made no difference. (Thanks Michael)

52. DRM Watch: Canadian Supreme Court Rejects ISP Music Royalties
    The Canadian high court affirms the common carrier status of internet serviceproviders.  
    http://www.drmwatch.com/legal/article.php/3376301
    
    Extractions: The Supreme Court of Canada ruled yesterday Therefore, both traditional ISPs and P2P file sharing networks have been studiously steering clear of any technology that has the appearance of being content-sensitive. Although this is understandable, it is somewhat unfortunate, because ISPs are natural adopters of DRM technology that would be used on behalf of their customers who are content providers.

53. Canadian Supreme Court Rules In Favor Of Monsanto
    canadian supreme court ruled in favor of agribusiness in the case of Monsanto v.Schmeiser today. The case began in August 1998, when Monsanto filed a  
    http://environment.about.com/b/a/087349.htm
    
    Extractions: zJs=10 zJs=11 zJs=12 zJs=13 zc(5,'jsc',zJs,9999999,'') About Environmental Issues Environmental Issues Essentials ... Help zau(256,140,140,'el','http://z.about.com/0/ip/417/C.htm','');w(xb+xb+' ');zau(256,140,140,'von','http://z.about.com/0/ip/496/7.htm','');w(xb+xb); Sign Up Now for the Environmental Issues newsletter! Canadian Supreme Court ruled in favor of agribusiness in the case of Monsanto v. Schmeiser today. The case began in August 1998, when Monsanto filed a statement alleging that Schmeiser had illegally purchased Roundup Ready(R) Canola seed from local growers to plant with his 1997 crop, then retained some of that year's seed to plant the next year. Schmeiser insists that his own crops were contaminated with Monsanto's patented GE seed. Farmer Loses Right to Farm GE Free, Monsanto Wins Right to Genetic Pollution

54. The Privacy Lawyer Canadian Supreme Court Rules Flashing Children
    canadian supreme court Rules Flashing Children OK From Living Room Window.canadian supreme court Rules Flashing Children OK From Living Room Window  
    http://theprivacylawyer.blogspot.com/2005/01/canadian-supreme-court-rules-flashi
    
    Extractions: @import url("http://www.blogger.com/css/blog_controls.css"); @import url("http://www.blogger.com/dyn-css/authorization.css?blogID=7389117"); @import url(http://www.blogger.com/css/navbar/main.css); @import url(http://www.blogger.com/css/navbar/1.css); BlogThis! Parry Aftab is The Privacy Lawyer columnist for Information Week and does privacy coaching and consulting. She was one of the first cyberlawyers in the United States and donates a substantial portion of her time to Internet safety, privacy and security education. Parry heads up the largest online safety and help group in cyberspace, WiredSafety.org. View my complete profile Canadian Supreme Court Rules Flashing Children OK From Living Room Window posted by Parry Aftab @ 12:16 AM Post a Comment

55. Weblog: Canadian Supreme Court Backs Same-Sex Marriage - Christianity Today Maga
    Christianity Today continues as a leader in providing informative editorial oncurrent events, news from a Christian perspective, Christian doctrine,  
    http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2004/149/41.0.html
    
    Extractions: Explore ChristianityToday.com: -Home Page -Christianity Today Magazine -Free! Newsletters and more! CHURCH/MINISTRY -LeadershipJournal.net -Church Products/Services -BuildingChurchLeaders.com -ChristianityTodayLibrary.com -ChurchSiteCreator.com -Conferences -Children's Ministry PREACHINGTODAY.COM -Sermon Illustrations -Sermon Transcripts -Audio Tapes COLLEGE/SEMINARY -Christian College Guide BIBLE -Bible Studies CHRISTIAN LIFE -Today's Christian -Faith in the Workplace -Spiritual Help -Global Christianity -Church Locator COMMUNITIES -Women -Men -Marriage -Parenting -Singles -Teens -Kids MEDIA GUIDE -Movies -Music INTERACT -E-cards - Free! -Message Boards SHOPPING -Books -Music -Our Store -Videos -Gifts -Classifieds -Personals -Home School Center MAGAZINES -Christianity Today -Campus Life -Christian Parenting Today -Today's Christian -Leadership -Marriage Partnership -Men of Integrity -Today's Christian Woman -Your Church

56. IFPI Welcomes Canadian Supreme Court Decision On Cross-border Internet Transmiss
    The Supreme Court of Canada today confirmed that internet transmissions into thecountry from outside are covered by domestic Canadian copyright law,  
    http://www.ifpi.org/site-content/press/20040630a.html
    
    Extractions: SEARCH IFPI HOME PRESS LIST IFPI NEWS IFPI welcomes Canadian Supreme Court decision on cross-border internet transmissions London, June 30, 2004 The intervention took place following an appeal by Canadian Internet companies against a tariff by the Society of Canadian Composers, Authors and Music Publishers (SOCAN), a performing rights society. CRIA reports that the Canadian music industry has experienced retail sales losses of in excess of $465 million since 1999 - as well as staff layoffs of 25% and more in the industry over the past year. More than 45,000 individuals are directly or indirectly dependent upon the health of the recording industry in Canada, including those in songwriting, recording studios, manufacturing, retailing, broadcasting, music publishing, concert promotion, management and many other primary and support services. IFPI represents the international recording industry with over 1,500 members in more than 70 countries and National Group affiliates in 46 countries.

57. Biblio Tech Review Sirsi - Canadian Supreme Court
    The Supreme Court of Canada Library is one of the most highly valued law librariesin Canada, comprising about 350000 volumes covering both the common law  
    http://www.biblio-tech.com/btr11/S_PD.cfm?DO=A&ArticleID=1070&XSection=BTR_Busin

58. Digital Media Europe: News - Canadian Supreme Court Rules Cached Music Files Not
    Daily News Service on the Digital Media sector across Europe.  
    http://www.dmeurope.com/default.asp?ArticleID=2207

59. Government Lawyers Present Case To Canadian Supreme Court For Same-sex Marriage
    The west s oldest newspaper, supplying daily news, weather, arts and entertainment,and real estate for Santa Fe and Northern New Mexico.  
    http://www.freenewmexican.com/news/5151.html

60. Canadian Supreme Court Revenue Law Stamps
    canadian supreme court Law revenue stamps, In Prize revenues.  
    http://www.esjvandam.com/revenues/federal/supreme_court.htm
    
    Extractions: Home Up Alberta revenue stamps British Columbia revenue stamps ... Canadian Weights and Measures revenue stamps [ Canadian Supreme Court revenue law stamps ] Canada Customs Duty revenue stamps Canadian War Tax revenue stamps Canada excise tax revenue stamps Canadian War Savings stamps ... Canadian Lock Seals SUPREME COURT - 1876 YOUNG QUEEN VICTORIA Canadian $ van Dam catalog # face value colour uncan used 1876 YOUNG QUEEN VICTORIA blue blue blue blue blue blue 1897 WIDOW QUEEN VICTORIA blue,wet print blue,dry print,wider blue blue black blue black 1915 GEORGE V blue rouletted (blue) rouletted (purple) blue (red) blue (purple) blue, wet print, low # dry print, wider 1935 GEORGE V. blue slate dark blue on $1 slate, horiz. bars on $1 vertical bars (blue 1938-1967 GEORGE VI. blue slate dark blue, yellow gum on 10c slate on 10c, silver o/p doubled silver overprint blue blue slate dark blue blue slate dark blue,off white paper red overprint red o/p + purple o/p red overprint red overprint

A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P  Q  R  S  T  U  V  W  X  Y  Z

41-60 of 113    Back | 1  | 2  | 3  | 4  | 5  | 6  | Next 20