Supreme Court Of Canada / Cour Supr Me Du Canada Gateway to the Supreme Court of Canada's home page and its other web pages. Features a photograph of the main courtroom. http://tmsyn.wc.ask.com/r?t=an&s=hb&uid=24312681243126812&sid=343126
Supreme Court Of Canada - Louise Arbour Role of the Court. The Canadian Judicial System. Court Building Supreme Court of Canada Mission and Objectives. Law Clerk Program http://tmsyn.wc.ask.com/r?t=an&s=hb&uid=24312681243126812&sid=343126
The Supreme Court Of Canada Online database of Supreme Court judgements since 1993. http://tmsyn.wc.ask.com/r?t=an&s=hb&uid=24312681243126812&sid=343126
Aboriginal Law And Legislation Online Supreme Court of Canada Decisions (1989 to date) Canadian Native Law Cases 17631978 (published by the Native Law Centre (U. Sask) http://tmsyn.wc.ask.com/r?t=an&s=hb&uid=24312681243126812&sid=343126
Extractions: OTTAWA (CNN) In a landmark gay rights ruling that could have ramifications across Canada, the Supreme Court ruled Thursday that Ontario's legal definition of a spouse as someone of the opposite sex is unconstitutional. The high court, by an 8-to-1 vote, gave Canada's most populous province six months to amend its Family Law Act to recognize same-sex couples. However, the court stressed that the ruling should not be construed as giving same-sex couples the right to marry. The decision was the Supreme Court's most definitive ruling yet on the legal rights of gays and lesbians in Canada. While Thursday's ruling applies directly only to Ontario, observers believe it could mean that hundreds of laws on both the federal and provincial levels will have to be rewritten.
Mapleleafweb.com Research - Supreme Court Of Canada Charter Subscribe. Subscribe. Unsubscribe. Welcome to the Mapleleafweb.com's canadian supreme court Charter Decision Summary and Research Resource. http://tmsyn.wc.ask.com/r?t=an&s=hb&uid=24312681243126812&sid=343126
Playlist: Canadian Supreme Court Rejects IPod Tax Canadas Supreme Court Thursday rejected attempts to levy a special tax on iPodsand other digital music devices. The court refused any further arguments on http://playlistmag.com/news/2005/07/29/ipodtax/index.php
Extractions: SEARCH Review: Motorola ROKR Rokr: What might have been The Things I Used to Do Adolphus Bell More Downloads ... More Playlists July 29, 2005 12:35 pm ET Macworld.co.uk By Macworld.co.uk Staff, Macworld.co.uk The court refused any further arguments on the matter. There will be no such levy applied in Canada. A local royalty collection body, the Canadian Private Copying Collective (CPCC), had fought to reinstate the tax, which was quashed by Canadian Federal Courts last year following action by retailers and manufacturers including Apple. A nonprofit agency CPCC had been collecting the tax on behalf of musicians. When implemented, the tax was designed to compensate artists for illegal downloads of their music. The rates were: CDN$2 (US$1.62) for non-removable memory capacity up to 1GB, $15 for 1-10GGB, $25 for over 10GB.
Uni.ca - Supreme Court Of Canada Reference 1998 General of Canada Allan Rock announced in 1996 that the Canadian government would seek a unity ruling from the Supreme Court, claiming his http://tmsyn.wc.ask.com/r?t=an&s=hb&uid=24312681243126812&sid=343126
Playlist Magazine: Canadian Supreme Court Rejects IPod Tax canadian supreme court rejects iPod tax 3676 Fri Jul 29 2005 0950 AM Canada s Supreme Court Thursday rejected attempts to levy a special tax on http://playlistmag.com/forums/ubbthreads/showflat.php?Cat=&Number=3676&page=0&vi
Supreme Court Of Canada 1992 Z Ndel Judgement of B'Nai Brith Canada and the Canadian Jewish Congress, Interveners. Reported at 1992 2 S.C.R. 731 1992 S.C.J. No. 70 Supreme Court of http://tmsyn.wc.ask.com/r?t=an&s=hb&uid=24312681243126812&sid=343126
Group To Picket Monday Swearing In Of New Canadian Supreme Court Thursday September 30, 2004 Printer friendly version. Email to a friend Group to Picket Monday Swearing in of New canadian supreme court http://tmsyn.wc.ask.com/r?t=an&s=hb&uid=24312681243126812&sid=343126
Extractions: Heritage Lecture #892 ROBERT E. MOFFIT: Ladies and gentlemen, I am happy to join my co-host, Grace-Marie Turner, President of the Galen Institute, in welcoming you to The Heritage Foundation. We are honored to have with us Dr. Jacques Chaoulli, whose recent case before the Canadian Supreme Court ended in a major victory for health care freedom in Canada. In Canada, patients have long been legally prohibited from spending their own money to purchase medical care privately if that care was also provided under the Canadian government's health care program. Many Canadians who did not want endure the wait for treatment under the government program, or suffer the pain or inconvenience of these restrictions, would often have to travel to the United States to get the care that they wanted or needed. That is why Dr. Chaoulli's victory in the Canadian Supreme Court, allowing patients to secure private care in Canada, is historic. The Canadian case has relevance for Americans. While ordinary Americans would consider government restrictions on their ability to spend their own money on legal medical services to be a shocking violation of their personal freedom, they should be reminded that the Clinton Administration and Congress enacted a similar restriction in the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 for the Medicare population. Under Section 4507 of the act, a Medicare patient could contract privately with a doctor for a medical service covered by Medicare only if the doctor would sign an affidavit to that effect, submit that affidavit to the Secretary of Health and Human Services within 10 days, and forgo reimbursement from all other Medicare patients for two full years. Since the enactment of this bizarre law, subsequent litigation and regulatory modifications have softened its impact, but it nonetheless remains on Medicare's books.
Extractions: FindLaw Legal Professionals Students Business ... MY FindLaw top(document.URL); Legal News Entertainment Sports Newsletters ... Lawyer Search State AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE DC FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY AS GU MP PR VI Select a Practice Area Administrative Law Adoption Agriculture Law Alternative Dispute Resolution Aviation Bankruptcy Law Business Organizations Child Support Civil Rights Constitutional Law Construction Law Consumer Protection Contracts Criminal Law Criminal Law Federal Debtor/Creditor Discrimination Divorce DUI/DWI Education Law Elder Law Eminent Domain Employment Law Employee Employment Law Employer Energy Law Environmental Law Estate Planning Family Law Franchising Gaming Law Government Contracts Insurance Law Intellectual Property Law International Law Internet Cyberspace Labor Law Landlord/Tenant Legal Malpractice Lemon Law Medical Malpractice Law Military Law Motor Vehicle Accidents Plaintiff Native Peoples Law Natural Resources Law Nursing Home Patents Personal Injury Defense Personal Injury Plaintiff Products Liability Law Professional Malpractice Law Real Estate Law Securities Law Sexual Harassment Social Security Disability Taxation Law Toxic Torts Trademarks Traffic Violations Transportation Law Trusts Wills Workers' Compensation Law Writ: Commentary Search Writ Front Page Special Coverage
OpinionJournal - Featured Article The Justices who sit on Canada s Supreme Court, by the way, aren ta bunch of Someone should make sure the canadian supreme court s ruling is on Governor http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110006813
Canadian Supreme Court: Information From Answers.com Supreme Court of Canada The Supreme Court Building in Ottawa The Supreme Courtof Canada is Canada s highest court and is located in the capital city. http://www.answers.com/topic/canadian-supreme-court
Extractions: showHide_TellMeAbout2('false'); Business Entertainment Games Health ... More... On this page: Wikipedia Mentioned In Or search: - The Web - Images - News - Blogs - Shopping Canadian Supreme Court Wikipedia Supreme Court of Canada The Supreme Court Building in Ottawa The Supreme Court of Canada is Canada's highest court and is located in the capital city of Ottawa . It is now the final court of appeal, the last judicial resort for all litigants, whether individual or governmental. Its jurisdiction embraces both the civil law of the province of Quebec and the common law of the other provinces and territories. When handling Quebec civil law cases the court is careful to have them reviewed by the three civil law judges that are always on the court. The court is composed of nine justices, formally appointed by the Governor General on the recommendation of the Cabinet. The court is housed in a massive Art Deco building designed by Ernest Cormier This article is part of the series
Extractions: Legal Status Upheld By Canadian Supreme Court The laws in Canada and enforcement focus on protecting community standards, protecting individuals from exploitation, yet at the same time upholding individual rights, including adult individual sexual rights. No where does the law seek to prevent anyone from being or using the services of an adult prostitute. But does lap dancing in strip clubs violate community standards? Are lap dancers being exploited? These are difficult questions. After conflicting lower court rulings, the Supreme Court of Canada made a landmark decision on the lap dance question in late 1999 and it supported individual sexual rights as long as it isn't taken too far. The bottom line is touching dancers by customers including sexually is legally supported as long as it does not involve "masturbation, fellatio, penetration or sodomy." Tuesday 14 December 1999
