Geometry.Net - Science: Radiocarbon Dating


Home - Science - Radiocarbon Dating

e99.com Bookstore

Images

Newsgroups

21-40 of 75 Back | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next 20

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Radiocarbon Dating: more books (100)

The Spatial Analysis of Radiocarbon Databases (bar s) by Thembi M. Russell, 2010-02
Radiocarbon After Four Decades: An Interdisciplinary Perspective
Altersbestimmungen im Quartar: Datierungen mit Radiokohlenstoff und anderen kernphysikalischen Methoden = Age determination in Quaternary : radiocarbon ... ; Bd. 55) (German Edition) by Horst Willkomm, 1976
Nuclear and Chemical Dating Techniques: Interpreting the Environmental Record (Acs Symposium Series 176)
Dating Dinosaurs And Other Old Things by K. Liptak, 1992-03-01
Implications of radiocarbon dates from Middle and South America (Middle American research records) by Robert Wauchope, 1954
Radiocarbon: Calibration and Prehistory
Archaeomagnetic Dating
Thermoluminescence Dating (Studies in Archaeological Science) by M. Aitken, 1985-12
Radiocarbon dating and the archaeologist by Elaine Paintin, 1977
Radiocarbon and U-series dating of the endemic deer Praemegaceros cazioti (Deperet) from ''Grotta Juntu'', Sardinia [An article from: Journal of Archaeological Science] by V. Benzi, L. Abbazzi, et all 2007-05-01
Zhongguo kaoguxue zhong tan shisi niandai shuju ji - Radiocarbon Dating in Chinese Archaeology by CASS Institute of Archaeology, 1983-01-01
Rolling back the years: radiocarbon dating gets a remake.(Neandertals ): An article from: Science News by Carolyn Barry, 2007-12-01
Isotopes of Carbon: Radiocarbon Dating, Carbon-14, Isotopes of Carbon, Carbon-13, Carbon-12, 13c, Carbon-11, Carbon-8, Carbon-9, Carbon-10

lists with details

Science NetLinks: Frosty The Snowman Meets His Demise: An Analogy To Carbon Dati
Write a letter to a friend explaining what radiocarbon dating is. Be sure to include how radiocarbon dating works backwards to solve a puzzle.
http://www.sciencenetlinks.com/lessons.cfm?DocID=171
How Does The Radiocarbon Dating Method Work?
An introduction to the concepts and facts which explain how radiocarbon dating works.
http://www.biblicalchronologist.org/answers/c14_method.php

Extractions: Radiocarbon dating is based on a few relatively simple principles. There are many carbon atoms in our environment. The vast majority of these are C (pronounced "c twelve"), the stable isotope of carbon. However, cosmic radiation constantly collides with atoms in the upper atmosphere. Part of the result of these collisions is the production of radiocarbon ( C, pronounced "c fourteen"), carbon atoms which are chemically the same as stable carbon, but have two extra neutrons. Radiocarbon is not stable; over time radiocarbon atoms decay into nitrogen atoms. This tendency to decay, called radioactivity, is what gives radiocarbon the name
Radiocarbon Dating Dinosaurs? | CRSEF Research
radiocarbon dating is not possible beyond 50000 years, yet these dates were within that limit. Since Creationists believe the earth s atmosphere is not more
http://www.worldbydesign.org/research/c14dating/datingdinosaurs.html

Extractions: DIRECT RADIOCARBON DATING OF DINOSAUR BONE FRAGMENTS: The dating of dinosaur fossils is not as simple a matter as the media and mainstream science would like us to believe. There are no magical dating machines generate a report which reads 70 million year old; rather most dating of fossils is done by dating nearby lava flows or other igneous or metamorphic rock assumed to have lost all daughter products and been "set" at the time of the dinosaur or other fossil formation. Then stratagraphic correlation is used to reconstruct the sequence and time. The only method that dates the fossils themselves is carbon dating but evolutionists believe that dinosaurs are too old for carbon dating. This begs the question, are they really that old? In 1970, Professor Robert Whitelaw of Virginia Polytechnic Institute examined the radiocarbon data reported in the journal, Radiocarbon . He was surprised to find that several of these came from specimens which would be considered several million years old by evolutionary dating. Examples are: Sabre-toothed tiger: 28,000 years (evolution: a few million)
Radiocarbon Dating - Hutchinson Encyclopedia Article About Radiocarbon Dating
Hutchinson encyclopedia article about radiocarbon dating. radiocarbon dating. Information about radiocarbon dating in the Hutchinson encyclopedia.
http://encyclopedia.farlex.com/radiocarbon dating

Extractions: encyclopedia Also found in: Dictionary/thesaurus Wikipedia 0.10 sec. write_ads(AdsNum, 0) Method of dating organic materials (for example, bone or wood), used in archaeology. Plants take up carbon dioxide gas from the atmosphere and incorporate it into their tissues, and some of that carbon dioxide contains the radioactive isotope carbon-14 (see radiocarbon cycle ). As this decays at a known rate (half of it decays every 5,730 years), the time elapsed since the plant died can be measured in a laboratory. Animals take carbon-14 into their bodies from eating plant tissues and their remains can be similarly dated. After 120,000 years so little carbon-14 is left that no measure is possible (see half-life Radiocarbon dating was first developed in 1949 by the US chemist Willard Libby . The method yields reliable ages back to about 50,000 years, but its results require correction since Libby's assumption that the concentration of carbon-14 in the atmosphere was constant through time has subsequently been proved wrong. Discrepancies were noted between carbon-14 dates for Egyptian tomb artefacts and construction dates recorded in early local texts. Radiocarbon dates from tree rings (see
Accuracy Of Radiocarbon Dating
1970 Furgeson used dendrochronology of bristlcode pines to calibrate radiocarbon dating back to 7484 years b.p. (before the present).
http://home.tiac.net/~cri/1999/c14hist.html

Extractions: By John Stockwell Regarding the often misquoted and maligned (by creationists) 14C dating method, here is a partial chronology of the development of the calibration of 14C, which includes consideration of sources of fluctuations in the background level of 14C. Much of creationist commentary on the possible errors in 14C is intended to portray the scientific community as being either incompetent or dishonest regarding such issues as the consideration of potential errors in radiometric dating methods. Creationists never discuss the fact that given these analyses, scientists have found ways of identifying and mitigating the effects of these sources of error. What follows is a summary from chapter 14.1.3, p.364-366 of Dickin [1995]: 1941: Thellier proposed that Earth's magnetic field experiences secular variations. 1949: Arnold and Libby publish radiocarbon dates of items of known age. 1952: Libby publishes first book on radiocarbon dating. 1954: Forbush observed that the 11-year cycle of sunspot activity was inversely correlated with cosmic-ray intensity.
Uses Of Radiocarbon Dating
Nuclear laboratories, awash with funds and prestige, spun off the discovery of an amazing new technique radiocarbon dating.
http://www.aip.org/history/climate/Radioc.htm

Extractions: Climate science required the invention and mastery of many difficult techniques. These had pitfalls, which could lead to controversy. An example of the ingenious technical work and hard-fought debates underlying the main story is the use of radioactive carbon-14 to assign dates to the distant past. For other examples, see the essays on Temperatures from Fossil Shells and Arakawa's Computation Device. The prodigious - LINKS - More discussion at Revelle's result It was especially fascinating to discover that our particular species of humans arose something like 100,000 years ago, no doubt deeply influenced by the ice ages. A few scientists noticed that the techniques might also be helpful for the study of climate itself. From its Ways were found to use carbon dioxide instead. Frustrating uncertainties prevailed until workers understood that their results had to be adjusted for the room's temperature and even the barometric pressure.
Radiocarbon Dating Services Lab. Commercial Offer: C14 At Kiev
C14. Dating material lab. radiocarbon dating services (analysis, tests) offered by conventional laboratory.Kiev, Ukraine. Analyses using of wood, charcoal,
http://www2.ldc.net/~mbuz/c14.htm

Extractions: It is fully-equipped laboratory, specializing in conventional and high-precision C analyses. (Responsible person Michael Buzinny tel./fax. 380 44 513-70-74 ) C dating is performed in our lab using modern conventional (LSC based) method since 1993. For all LS measurements we use LS spectrometer Quantulus 1220 TM , produced by PerkinElmer (formerly Wallac Oy). Teflon vials shaped 7 ml, 3 ml, 0,8 ml allow optimize LS counting performance for benzene samples of different mass. We have performed hundreds of carbon-14 analyses for our researches and some for commercial purposes. We would like to discuss a radiocarbon concerned projects and other radioisotope researches especially from early stage of planning. Please send your inquiry or any ideas to Dr. Michael Buzinny
Apologetics Press - Dating In Archaeology: Radiocarbon & Tree-Ring Dating
Like other radiometric methods, radiocarbon dating faces technical problems and operates under some questionable assumptions.
http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/2019

Extractions: Printer version Email this article EDITORS NOTE : This is the first of a two-part series on Dating in Archaeology. Part II is titled Dating in Archaeology: Challenges to Biblical Credibility.] Over the last few decades, archaeology has come into its own as a scientific endeavor. Gone are the romantic images of gentlemen in pith helmets carting off treasures to the museums and estates of Europe. Gone, too, is the idea that archaeologists are always on the side of the Bible believer. Modern interpretations frequently challenge biblical accounts. Further, dates generated by new techniques are often at odds with the timing of events given by Scripture. The purpose of this first article is to discuss problems with radiocarbon and tree-ring dating (or dendrochronology), which are the two most common direct dating techniques in archaeology. Problems with relative dating by interpretation of material culturearrowheads, pottery, toolswill be the subject of the next article.
Carbon 14 Dating Of The Mended Corner Of The Shroud Of Turin
At best the carbon dating of the Shroud of Turin is inconclusive. How medieval artisans unwittingly fooled the best radiocarbon dating labs and scientists.
http://www.shroudofturin4journalists.com/carbon14.htm

Extractions: Shroud of Turin and the Resurrection of Jesus Carbon 14 dating in 1988 supposedly proved that the Shroud of Turin was medieval. But not everyone was convinced. An overwhelming amount of other data suggested that the Shroud was indeed much older, perhaps first century and from the environs of Jerusalem. Many researchers who were not experts in radiocarbon dating attempted to explain why the carbon 14 dating was wrong. Several ideas were put forward. Some of these explanation gained traction in the media and with the public. One hypothesis was that a serious fire in 1532 that nearly destroyed the Shroud had somehow changed the measurement age of the cloth. Another theory was that a bioplastic-polymer growing on the cloth contaminated the sample. These ideas were scientifically insupportable. Scientists, who were knowledgeable in radiocarbon dating, science dismissed these ideas as preposterous. Photomicrograph of fibers from a warp segment of carbon-14 sample. Chemically, it is unlike the rest of the Shroud.
Giem, P. --- Carbon-14 Dating Models And Experimental Implications
The carbon in animals that eat these plants might be around 2 years old , which is negligible in terms of radiocarbon dating. The carbon in carnivores
http://www.grisda.org/origins/24050.htm

Extractions: Loma Linda, California Origins WHAT THIS ARTICLE IS ABOUT Eight categories of models for converting carbon-14 dates into real time are discussed. Six of these models are based on a creation as described in Genesis and a short age of life on earth. Differences between the models are specified, especially those that are subject to experimental testing. Such features include (1) differences between ring years and radiocarbon years in trees that should be immediately postdiluvian by creationist theories, (2) the accuracy, or lack thereof, of the dendrochronological radiocarbon calibration curve in the historical era, and (3) the possible existence of carbon-14 in antediluvian fossil material. Suggestions are offered for experimental projects that would resolve these uncertainties. In this paper I will discuss eight categories of carbon-14 models and their experimental implications. Six, or three-quarters of these, are creationist models. The purpose of this paper is to stimulate thinking and to argue for an experimental perspective. CONSTRAINTS Any model of carbon-14 dating must satisfy certain constraints. First, since carbon-14 dating is objective and reproducible, it cannot be ignored. One cannot simply dismiss it out of hand; there should be an explanatory model for the data. Second, it has been validated at least back to 300 B.C. by comparison with many other reliable dating methods.
Historic Scotland / Radiocarbon Dating Search
radiocarbon dating Introduction Further Reading Project Examples Coastal Archaeology radiocarbon dating Search. Search Database. Site. Council
http://www.historic-scotland.gov.uk/wwd_carbondatingsearch

Extractions: Radiocarbon Dating Search Search Database Site Council Choose Council Aberdeen, City Of Aberdeenshire Angus Argyll And Bute Clackmannan Dumfries And Galloway Dundee, City Of East Ayrshire East Dunbartonshire East Lothian East Renfrewshire Edinburgh, City Of Falkirk Fife Glasgow, City Of Highland Inverclyde Midlothian Moray North Ayrshire North Lanarkshire Orkney Islands Perth And Kinross Renfrewshire Scottish Borders Shetland Islands South Ayrshire South Lanarkshire Stirling West Dunbartonshire West Lothian Western Isles Name Material Found Code, if known Age to
Radiocarbon Dating
This article follows Mary Hudson s excellent description of the basis of radiocarbon dating in the April 1997 edition of the Aucilla River Times.
http://www.flmnh.ufl.edu/natsci/vertpaleo/aucilla12_1/radio99.htm

Extractions: More about radiocarbon dating By David Thulman The great promise of radiocarbon (C14) dating is that it provides a method for dating and sequencing specific prehistoric events. On the Aucilla projects, C14 dating is used as a method for weeding out unpromising sties that are either too old or too young. In addition, it provides a method for determining the relative chronologies at the various sites and their relation to sites elsewhere in the world. Are we working on some of the earliest human cultural remains in North America? C14 dating can help provide the answer. Given the pervasive reliance on C14 dating in archeology, it is necessary to understand the limitations of C14 dating and how the results can be skewed and misused. A C14 date is not really a date at all; it is an estimation of the number of years it would take the radioactive carbon in a dead organism to decay to leave the amount of radioactive carbon actually found when a sample of that organism is analyzed. Carbon 14 dating is based upon a number of important assumptions, but only one will be discussed here. In order to compare C14 dates meaningfully, we must assume that all organisms contained the same amount of C14 when they died. Otherwise, organisms with less C14 will appear older because there will be less C14 than expected when the sample is tested. Unfortunately, that assumption is faulty. As Mary Hudson explained in her Aucilla River Times article two years ago, C14 is created by cosmic radiation in the upper atmosphere. That radiation fluctuates year to year and therefore so does the creation of C14 . That means if our branch grew at a time when relatively lower levels of C14 were in the atmosphere, it would have less C14 when it died and would show an older apparent age than it should. Conversely, if it grew at a time of abundant C14 it would appear younger than it should. This differential C14 concentration may give our branch a younger C14 age than another branch that died hundreds of years after our branch, making comparison of the two samples misleading.
The Biggest Radiocarbon Dating Mistake Ever
It may well go down as the biggest radiocarbon dating mistake in history; not because there is anything wrong with the measurement process (there may not
http://www.innoval.com/C14/

Extractions: Radiocarbon Dating Article figures notes works cited ... What Else It may well go down as the biggest radiocarbon dating mistake in history; not because there is anything wrong with the measurement process (there may not have been); not because there is anything inherently wrong with carbon 14 dating (there is not); not because of shoddy sample taking (which indeed was shoddy); not because of red flags that should have raised serious questions (there were quite a few); and not even because a basic tenet of archaeological dating was ignored by good scientists. No, the reason is because, now, nearly two decades later, whenever carbon 14 dating is discussed in high school or college classrooms, students are likely to raise a hand and ask some probing questions: What about the Shroud of Turin? Was it dated correctly? If not, how could so many scientists from so many reputable radiocarbon dating laboratories screw up so badly? Were mistakes made in the radiocarbon dating of the shroud? Were enough serious mistakes made to call the results into question? Consider what no less than twenty-one scientists from the University of Oxford, the University of Arizona, the Institut f¼r Mittelenergiephysik in Zurich, Columbia University, and the British Museum wrote in a peer-reviewed paper published in 1989 in
NOSAMS
Webinfo Radiocarbon from University of Waikato radiocarbon dating Laboratory (AMS) in New Zealand website C-14 AMS-Lab of Erlangen at Nurnberg University
http://www.nosams.whoi.edu/about/carbon_dating.html

Extractions: Carbon is one of the chemical elements. Along with hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen, phosphorus, and sulfur, carbon is a building block of biochemical molecules ranging from fats, proteins, and carbohydrates to active substances such as hormones. All carbon atoms have a nucleus containing six protons. Ninety-nine percent of these also contain six neutrons. The 6 proton + 6 neutron atoms are said to have a mass of 12 and are referred to as "carbon-12." The nuclei of the remaining one percent of carbon atoms contain not six but either seven or eight neutrons in addition to the standard six protons. They have masses of 13 and 14 respectively and are referred to as "carbon-13" and "carbon-14."
The Pitfalls Of Radiocarbon Dating
Speaking of my research as far as it affects the radiocarbon dating method, I would like to separate the finds concerning natural events (Worlds in
http://www.varchive.org/ce/c14.htm

Extractions: The Pitfalls of Radiocarbon Dating Offering in 1952 his new radiocarbon method for calculating the age of organic material (the time interval since the plant or the animal died), W. F. Libby clearly saw the limitations of the method and the conditions under which his theoretical figures would be valid: A. Of the three reservoirs of radiocarbon on earththe atmosphere, the biosphere, and the hydrosphere, the richest is the lastthe oceans with the seas. The correctness of the method depends greatly on the condition that in the last 40 or 50 thousand years the quantity of water in the hydrosphere (and carbon diluted in it) has not substantially changed. : B. The method depends also on the condition that during the same period of time the influx of cosmic rays or energy particles coming from the stars and the sun has not suffered substantial variations. To check on the method before applying it on various historical and paleontological material, Libby chose material of Egyptian archaeology, under the assumption that no other historical material from over 2,000 years ago is so secure as to its absolute dating. When objects of the Old Kingdom and Middle Kingdom of Egypt yielded carbon dates that appeared roughly comparable with the historical dates, Libby made his method known. But as the method was refined, it started to show rather regular anomalies. First, it was noticed that, when radiocarbon dated, wood grown in the 20th century appears more ancient than wood grown in the 19th century. Suess explained the phenomenon by the fact that the increased industrial use of fossil carbon in coal and in oil changed the ratio between the dead carbon C12 and the C14 (radiocarbon) in the atmosphere and therefore also in the biosphere. In centuries to come a body of a man or animal who lived and died in the 20th century would appear paradoxically of greater age since death than the body of a man or animal of the 19th century, and if the process of industrial use of fossil, therefore dead, carbon continues to increase, as it is expected will be the case, the paradox will continue into the forthcoming centuries.
Cambridge Quaternary » Radiocarbon Dating In Cambridge
It is nearly fifty years now since Willard Libby s concept of radiocarbon dating spread like wildfire and captured the imagination of every archaeologist
http://www.quaternary.group.cam.ac.uk/history/radiocarbon/

Extractions: Generally speaking, it was the sounder and more confident heads in the community who sought grants to start the early Radiocarbon Laboratories. It was customary to then prevail on some well known physics or chemistry professor to supply the technical expertise, and he in turn would select some unsuspecting graduate student to build it. Graduate students were among the few at that time who could even spell the magic words 'nucleonics', 'electronics' and 'vacuum lines' born of hush-hush wartime technologies. In many ways the era was analogous to today's computer explosion where fortune favours the young and the brave. One may detect the deliberate use of the word 'build', and not 'operate' for, as we shall see, few had discovered the magic formula for making it work. It was in this firmament of hope compounded by confusion that rewarding careers began and lifelong friendships were forged. It was thus in early 1952 that Harry Godwin, who had recently formed the University Sub-Department of Quaternary Research in the Botany School, applied for a grant from the Nuffield Foundation of eight thousand pounds over five years to create the Cambridge Laboratory. Harry secured the enthusiastic advice of Alfred Maddock, a radiochemist by avocation and a walking encyclopaedia by nature, to steer the technical side. I had met Alfred at a Radiation Chemistry Conference in Leeds in April of 1952, and was as impressed with his capacity then as I am forty-four years later. Alfred had spent the War working on secret atomic matters in Canada, and his moment of glory had come when he recovered the entire stock of Canada's plutonium from the sawn-up pieces of a laboratory bench top - how it got there in the first place is a matter which the faithful never discuss.
Dating The Pyramids
Robert Wenke, John Nolan, and Ala a Amran collect and log samples for radiocarbon dating from the pyramid of Menkaure at Giza.
http://www.archaeology.org/9909/abstracts/pyramids.html

Extractions: Home Subscribe News Shop ... Email this article Dating the Pyramids Volume 52 Number 5, September/October 1999 by members of the David H. Koch Pyramids Radiocarbon Project Robert Wenke, John Nolan, and Ala'a Amran collect and log samples for radiocarbon dating from the pyramid of Menkaure at Giza. Pyramid of Khafre is in background. (Mark Lehner) [LARGER IMAGE] 1984 Results. The 1984 radiocarbon dates from monuments spanning Dynasty 3 (Djoser) to late Dynasty 5 (Unas), averaged 374 years older than the Cambridge Ancient History The 1995 Project. Old Kingdom Problem. If the Middle Kingdom radiocarbon dates are okay, why are the Old Kingdom ones from pyramids so problematic? The pyramid builders used older cultural material, whether out of expedience or to make a conscious connection between their pharaoh and his predecessors. In galleries under the pyramid of the Dynasty 3 pharaoh Djoser more than 40,000 stone vessels were found. Inscriptions on them included most of the kings of Dynasty 1 and 2, but Djoser's name occurred only once. Perhaps Djoser gathered up the vases from the 200-year-old Archaic tombs at North Saqqara. In Dynasty 12, Amenemhet I actually took bits and pieces of Old Kingdom tomb chapels and pyramid temples (including those of the Giza Pyramids) and dumped them into the core of his pyramid at Lisht. At Giza, south of the Sphinx, we are excavating remains of facilities for storage and production of fish, meat, bread, and copper that date to the middle and end of Dynasty 4, when the pyramids of Khafre and Menkaure were under construction. Three of the eight dates from samples taken here are almost direct hits on Menkaure's historical dates, 2532- 2504 B.C. The other five, however, range from 350 to 100 years older. Our radiocarbon dates from the site suggest that, like those from the pyramids, the dates on charcoal from the settlement scatter widely in time with many dates older than the historical estimate. The pyramid builders were likely recycling their own settlement debris.
Carbon-14 Dating
radiocarbon dating is a method of estimating the age of organic material. It was developed right after World War II by Willard F. Libby and coworkers,
http://www.ndt-ed.org/EducationResources/HighSchool/Radiography/carbon14dating.h

Extractions: Home Education Resources Science of NDT Radiography CARBON-14 DATING After reading this section you will be able to do the following As you learned in the previous page, carbon dating uses the half-life of Carbon-14 to find the approximate age of an object that is 40,000 years old or younger. In the following section we are going to go more in-depth about carbon dating in order to help you get a better understanding of how it works. What exactly is radiocarbon dating? Radiocarbon dating is a method of estimating the age of organic material. It was developed right after World War II by Willard F. Libby and coworkers, and it has provided a way to determine the ages of different materials in archeology, geology, geophysics, and other branches of science. Some examples of the types of material that radiocarbon can determine the ages of are wood, charcoal, marine and freshwater shell, bone and antler, and peat and organic-bearing sediments. Age determinations can also be obtained from carbonate deposits such as calcite, dissolved carbon dioxide, and carbonates in ocean, lake, and groundwater sources.
In The Beginning: Compelling Evidence For Creation And The Flood - FAQ2.html
radiocarbon dating requires knowing the ratio of carbon14 to carbon-12 in To understand the other capabilities and limitations of radiocarbon dating,
http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/FAQ2.html
RADIOCARBON DATING AND SCRIPTURE
This essay briefly describes the accuracy of the book of Genesis based on radiocarbon (C14) and archaeological evidence.
http://www.geocities.com/peaceharris/c14/

Extractions: This essay attempts to show the reader that the first book of Moses, commonly called Genesis, is accurate. To prove its accuracy, archaeological evidence based on radiocarbon dating is used. We first model the variation of radiocarbon in the atmosphere assuming that scripture is accurate, then verify whether or not observed data fits this model. C is produced in the atmosphere when neutrons from cosmic rays bombard nitrogen.

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

21-40 of 75 Back | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next 20