Home  - Nobel - Josephson Brian D

Books Baby Camera Phones Computers Games DVD Electronics Kitchen Magazines Music Garden Software Tools Toys Video Apparel & Accessories Jewelry & Watches Musical Instruments Health & Personal Care Beauty Sports & Outdoors Office Products

e99.com Bookstore

Images

Newsgroups

61-80 of 106    Back | 1  | 2  | 3  | 4  | 5  | 6  | Next 20

A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P  Q  R  S  T  U  V  W  X  Y  Z

Josephson Brian D:     more detail

Parapsychology In The Twenty-First Century: Essays On The Future Of Psychical Research by Lance Storm, 2004-12-23 Science et conscience: Les deux lectures de l'univers : colloque de Cordoue, [1er au 5 octobre 1979] (French Edition) by Yves Jaigu, Brian D. Josephson, et all 1980 Brian David Josephson: An entry from Gale's <i>Science and Its Times</i> by Philip Downey, 2001

lists with details

61. ISS: Letters To A Prestigious Science Journal
    brian D. josephson. (1) Good, IJ, Nature 389, 8067, 1997. Clarification theP-value discussed enters into the calculation of the so-called file-drawer  
    http://www.survivalafterdeath.org/letters/radin.htm
    
    Extractions: I have heard that numerous people have gained an unfavorable impression of my book, "The Conscious Universe" (1997, HarperEdge), as a result of a review published in your journal on Oct. 23rd, p.806. Prof. I. J. Good's review involved factual errors, not merely differences in opinion, and I would like the journal to publish a correction in view of this. In his review (Oct. 23rd, p.806) of my book "The Conscious Universe" (1997, HarperEdge), I.J. Good suggests, based on certain misunderstandings on his part, that something "must be" wrong with my statistical arguments in favor of the reality of psychic phenomena. His inability to reproduce my estimate that 3,300 unpublished, unsuccessful experiments would be required for each published ESP card experiment (to nullify the cumulative outcome) follows from his incorrect assumption that my words "more than", used in connection with the cumulative odds against chance for the 186 experiments listed in Pratt et al (1966, "ESP after 60 years", as noted in my book), could safely be replaced by "approximately equal to." The actual p-value is approximately 10 , to which application of standard methods (Rosenthal, 1991, "Meta-analytic procedures for social research") gives my reported figure. Secondly, Good attributed to me an inaccurate statement actually made by the skeptical psychologist Mark Hansel. I am well aware that combining the statistical outcomes of experiments is not the same as combining the probabilities of independent events, but did not think it necessary to correct Hansel's mistake in a book aimed towards a general readership.

62. 161josephson2
    brian D. josephson This talk mirrors Pathological Science , a lecture givenby Chemistry Laureate Irving Langmuir. Langmuir discussed cases where  
    http://blake.montclair.edu/~kowalskil/cf/161josephson.html
    
    Extractions: It is his lecture at the last annual meeting of Nobel winners in Landau, Germany. According to Haiko Lietz, a science reporter who attended the gathering: "the Lindau conference was very interesting, as one can imagine. Brian Josephson created a big stir. He spoke extensively on cold fusion, and how unscientific attitudes and a publication policy prohibited the field from becoming known in the scientific community. He was the talk of the day. Many students were asking him questions, they were open and interested. Reactions by the Nobel laureates were twofold: Some seemed to be surprised that cold fusion is still around, while others remained silent.” Earthshaking shaking claims require earthshaking evidence. Are you saying that such evidence is being suppressed and HAS been for lo these many years ? This stand wouldn't be giving the 'physics community' much credit. Has EVERYONE missed out on the shaking of the earth? How long was required for 'polywater' to become a lost cause?

63. Quantum Philosophy Theories
    brian D. josephson Biological Utilisation of Quantum NonLocality- 12)Prof.Ruth Kastner -Geometrical Phase Effects and Bohm’s Quantum Potential and TSQT  
    http://www.qpt.org.uk/
    
    Extractions: Basic QM Copenhagen Interpretation Idealistic Theories Realistic Theories ... Entanglement and Time by Dr. A. Suarez (part 1) Quantum Philosophy Theories Academic web site. New service, mail to: authors.box@qpt.org.uk, it is possible send a public e-mail to the authors regarding information and papers online. Please go to Authors P.O. Box (Numered List). Papers online ( update 10 August)by: Prof.Clarke, Prof. Goldstein, Prof. Zanghi, Prof. Rovelli, Prof. Steane, Prof. Stapp, Prof.Smith, Prof.Chaitin, Prof.Cahill, Prof.Zurek, Prof.Goswami, Prof.W.M.de Muynck, Prof.Durr. Prof.Taylor, Prof. Tumulka

64. Quantum Dualism Ok?
    brian D. josephson and Fotini PallikariViras, Biological Utilisation of Quantum brian D. josephson, Beyond quantum theory a realist psycho-biological  
    http://www.newdualism.org/quantum.htm
    
    Extractions: Site Map Is Orthodox Quantum Physics consonant with a Plausible Dualism? The problem of the relation between mind and body is well known as a difficult `world knot'. Over the centuries various monistic and dualistic theories have been proposed, and the subject has had renewed interest as we try to assimilate the implications of quantum physics. These implications may make us re-examine our views of brains and bodies, but it is still not clear what consequences they have for our understanding of minds. We may suspect that quantum mechanics and consciousness are related, but the details are not at all clear. More detail .. In context of Mind-Body Dualism: Henry Stapp home preprints

65. Dr.Tarek Said's Homepage-Nobel Prize Winners
    1926 ARISTIDE brianD GUSTAV STRESEMANN 1973 Esaki, Leo Giaever, Ivar josephson, brian D. 1972 Bardeen, John Cooper, Leon, N. Schrieffer,  
    http://www.geocities.com/tsaid3/nobel.html

66. Parapsychology
    Jessica Utts and brian D. josephson, 1996. An assessment of the evidence forpsychic functioning brian D. josephson and Beverly A. Rubik, 1992  
    http://www.emergentmind.org/Arch8.htm

67. Norwegian Inventions, Discoveries And Awards
    josephson, brian D., Great Britain, Cambridge University, Cambridge, (1940) forhis theoretical predictions of the properties of a supercurrent through a  
    http://www.cyberclip.com/Katrine/NorwayInfo/NorgeInv.html
    
    Extractions: Discoveries Inventions Awards Eiríkr raudi (Eirik the Red) emigrated from Jæren in Norway to Iceland in 981 or 982 in search of a new land. The reason for his departure was apparently some unexplained local murders. From Iceland, Eirik made lots of travels, and on one of them found Greenland, which was soon colonized. But it was his son, Leif, who was going to make the biggest discovery... (see below) The Icelandic born Leif Eirikson, son of Eirik the Red (see above), followed in his father's footsteps and discovered more new land: He found a land he called Helluland (Flatstone Land, probably Baffin Island), then he sailed to Markland (Forest Land, Labrador), and from there to Vinland . The account of his voyage is preserved in Gronlendinga saga. Eiriks saga rauda has a different version: according to this, Leif put out to sea from Norway, in order to sail home to Greenland; he was driven off course, and came to an unknown land where he found self-sown wheat and vine trees. A new expedition, led by Toifinnr Karlsefni, set out for this new land, and in connection with his expedition, the saga calls the land Vinland. Traditions, it will be seen, differ, but they agree that a new land far west in the Atlantic had been discovered. The year is about A.D. 1000.

68. Superconductor History
    brian josephson. Another significant theoretical advancement came in 1962 whenbrian D. josephson (above), a graduate student at Cambridge University,  
    http://superconductors.org/History.htm
    
    Extractions: Superconductors , materials that have no resistance to the flow of electricity, are one of the last great frontiers of scientific discovery. Not only have the limits of superconductivity not yet been reached, but the theories that explain superconductor behavior seem to be constantly under review. In 1911 superconductivity was first observed in mercury by Dutch physicist Heike Kamerlingh Onnes of Leiden University (shown above). When he cooled it to the temperature of liquid helium, 4 degrees Kelvin (-452F, -269C), its resistance suddenly disappeared. The Kelvin scale represents an "absolute" scale of temperature. Thus, it was necessary for Onnes to come within 4 degrees of the coldest temperature that is theoretically attainable to witness the phenomenon of superconductivity. Later, in 1913, he won a Nobel Prize in physics for his research in this area. Walter Meissner The next great milestone in understanding how matter behaves at extreme cold temperatures occurred in 1933. German researchers Walter Meissner (above) and Robert Ochsenfeld discovered that a superconducting material will repel a magnetic field (below graphic). A magnet moving by a conductor induces currents in the conductor. This is the principle upon which the electric generator operates. But, in a superconductor the induced currents exactly mirror the field that would have otherwise penetrated the superconducting material - causing the magnet to be repulsed. This phenomenon is known as strong diamagnetism and is today often referred to as the "Meissner effect" (an eponym). The Meissner effect is so strong that a magnet can actually be

69. Www.globalresearch.ca :: View Topic - PROOF THE TWIN TOWERS WERE DELIBERATELY DE
    winner brian D. josephson, who teaches physics at the University of brian D.josephson This talk mirrors Pathological Science , a lecture  
    http://globalresearch.ca.myforums.net/viewtopic.php?t=353

70. Nobel Prize Winner Accuses
    brian D. josephson, Department of Physics, University of Cambridge.http//www.tcm.phy.cam.ac.uk/~bdj10. This talk mirrors Pathological Science ,  
    http://physics.nad.ru/engboard/messages/1366.html
    
    Extractions: Pathological Disbelief Summary of lecture by Brian D. Josephson, Department of Physics, University of Cambridge http://www.tcm.phy.cam.ac.uk/~bdj10 Other popular forms of attack are "if X were true we would have to start over again" (as we of course had to do with Relativity and Quantum Theory, and so the argument proves nothing), and then there is the dictum "Extraordinary Claims require Extraordinary Evidence", which has the marvellous feature of allowing the requirements for acceptable proof to be stretched indefinitely as more and more support for a contested claim comes in. Its originator, the late Marcello Truzzi, later decided that his comment was 'a non sequitur, meaningless and question-begging', and had planned to write a debunking of his own creation (5). Ref. 6 takes a light-hearted look at a range of strategies used by critics. In an attempt to promote proper discussion of the issue, I tried in 2002 to upload a survey by Storms (7) to, the preprint server arxiv.org, the natural place for facilitating such discussion, but the moderators frustrated this intent by deleting the review, declaring it "inappropriate" (chemists, being a more robust species than physicists, were permitted to see it on their own server chemweb.com). A breath of fresh air has been introduced into the situation now, with the recent decision of the US Department of Energy to review the research (8); if the reviewers simply look at some of the research going on they will almost inevitably conclude that fusion can take place at ordinary temperatures, with a yield far in excess of the 'almost undetectable level' referred to in Langmuir's lecture.

71. Star Drive Discussion Group
    Nobel Physics Laureate brian josephson defends paranormal. Thu Aug 4, 2005 0756.198.129.219.178 brian D. josephson bdj10@cam.ac.uk  
    http://disc.server.com/discussion.cgi?disc=68326;article=1900;title=Star Drive D

72. Stardrive.org - - Tucson III Update Page
    brian D. josephson bdj10@cam.ac.uk * MindMatter * Cavendish Lab., MadingleyRd, Cambridge CB3 0HE, UK * Unification * voice +44(0)1223  
    http://www.stardrive.org/tucson3.shtml
    
    Extractions: II. Bohm and Hiley characterize the quantum active information of the quantum potential Q on the system point P (e.g. set of particles, classical gauge field configurations on a spacelike surface, or any combination of the latter two) as "rudimentary mindlike". Kieseppa argues that the "mindlike" characterization is not warranted for two definite reasons. First Q has no sources. This implies a kind of covariance of possible representations that destroys the claim of "form dependence". Second, the Bohm quantum non- mechanics of Q -> P is deterministic even though placing the system point P in a desired place in the Q-field is "uncontrollable". That is we cannot control the initial condition for the deterministic motion of P in its configuration space. However, my extension of the Bohm nonmechanics (Hiley prefers use of "nonmechanics" to "mechanics") evades both of Kieseppa's objections. That is, his objections become arguments for my Q*

73. Casys2005
    brian D. josephson, Nobel Prize in Physics, Cambridge University (UK). Prof.John Horton Conway, Finite Mathematics, Princeton University (USA)  
    http://www.ulg.ac.be/mathgen/CHAOS/CASYS2005.htm
    
    Extractions: CALL FOR PAPERS – CASYS ’05 - International Conference on COMPUTING ANTICIPATORY SYSTEMS – LIEGE, Belgium, August 8-13, 2005 at HEC-ULg – organized by asbl CHAOS - INVITED SPEAKERS: Brian D. Josephson, Nobel Prize in Physics – John Horton Conway - Mitchell J. Feigenbaum If the MENUS do not appear click here – Up-dated on AUGUST 2, 2005 – Seventh International Conference on Computing Anticipatory Systems Liège, Belgium, August 8-13, 2005 To be held at HEC Management School - University of Liege 14 rue Louvrex, B-4000 Liège, Belgium Organized by ASBL CHAOS, Centre for Hyperincursion and Anticipation in Ordered Systems, Tel. : + 32 (0)4 366 00 28 Mobile: +32(0)4 95 510 419 Fax: + 32 (0)4 366 94 89 http://www.ulg.ac.be/mathgen/CHAOS Daniel.Dubois@ulg.ac.be President: Prof. Daniel M. Dubois , HEC Management School - University of Liege (Belgium) Vice-President: Prof. Adel F. Antippa , Physique, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières (Canada) Invited Speakers: Prof. Brian D. Josephson Nobel Prize in Physics Cambridge University (UK) Prof. John Horton Conway

74. SIMO - Società Italiana Di Medicina Omeopatica - Notizie
    brian D. josephson University of Cambridge. Invia per email  
    http://www.omeomed.net/news/fullnews.php?id=43

75. Society For Scientific Exploration: Articles
    The Paranormal The Evidence and Its Implications for Consciousness Utts, Jessica josephson, brian D. Academic Programs Related Courses Internships  
    http://www.scientificexploration.org/yi/articles.php

76. Active Skim View Of: 12 Two Nobels Are Better Than One Hole In One
    In 1962 brian josephson, a 23year-old graduate student of brian Pippard, particularly when one or both are superconducting, and brian D  
    http://www.nap.edu/nap-cgi/skimit.cgi?isbn=0309084083&chap=219-240

77. SCIENCE EVENTS
    The josephson effect, a quantum phenomenon, was largely formulated by the NobelPrize Laureates brian D. josephson and Philip W. Anderson.  
    http://funphysics.jpl.nasa.gov/technical/library/sig-events-03/sig030214-science
    
    Extractions: JPL Group Publishes Ideas on Observing Josephson Effects Near the Lambda Transition The "Fluctuations of the Phase Difference across an Array of Josephson Junctions in Superfluid He near the Lambda Transition." by Talso Chui, Warren Holmes and Konstantin Penanen has been accepted for publication by the Physical Review Letters. The Josephson effect, a quantum phenomenon, was largely formulated by the Nobel Prize Laureates Brian D. Josephson and Philip W. Anderson. This phenomenon in superconductors is the basis of the Superconducting QUantum Interference Device (SQUID). Using SQUIDs, researchers have made the most sensitive measurements of magnetic field, temperature, displacement and pressure. This paper is a theory of thermal noise in Josephson junctions, which is applied to the case of an array of superfluid helium weak links. We explain why the Josephson effect is observable in an array of weak links in superfluid He, and not in a single link. This theory is applicable to the design of ultra-sensitive gyroscopes for ground and space based applications.

78. ノーベル物理学賞 - ブライアãƒ�
    Translate this page The summary for this Japanese page contains characters that cannot be correctly displayed in this language/character set.  
    http://www.nobelpreis.org/japanese/physik/josephson.htm

79. Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB)
    In 1962, the 22year-old British student brian D. josephson predicted two effectswhich could experimentally verified shortly afterwards.  
    http://www.ptb.de/en/org/2/Inhalte/Josephson/josephson.htm
    
    Extractions: The Josephson effects occur if two superconductors are weakly coupled, e.g. by separating them by an insulating layer of a few nanometer in thickness. Irradiation of this Josephson junction with microwaves (being an electromagnetic wave) creates between the superconductors discrete voltage levels depending only on the ratio of two fundamental constants and the frequency f of the microwaves. These steps of constant voltage are generated at voltages V n n = 1, 2, 3, ... denotes the number of the steps, h the Planck constant and e the elementary charge. The term Josephson constant K J is nowadays used for the quotient 2 e h instead of its reciprocal value for historical reasons. By means of Josephson junctions, voltages can be reproduced with relative uncertainties of less than one part in ten billion (1 : 10 , i.e. 1 nV at 10 V). The Josephson effect is therefore world-wide used as a basis for constant reference voltages in metrological national institutes and in calibration laboratories of industry. As the Josephson constant is not known with the needed accuracy, the same agreed value is used everywhere for these purposes, which is named

80. Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB)
    Translate this page Im Jahre 1962 sagte der damals 22jährige britische Student brian D. josephson zweiEffekte voraus, die kurz darauf experimentell bestätigt werden konnten.  
    http://www.ptb.de/de/org/2/Inhalte/Josephson/josephson.htm
    
    Extractions: Die Josephson-Effekte treten auf, wenn zwei Supraleiter schwach gekoppelt sind, indem sie z.B. durch eine isolierende Schicht von wenigen Nanometern getrennt sind. Wird auf ein derartiges Josephson-Element eine Mikrowelle (eine elektro-magnetische Schwingung) eingestrahlt, werden zwischen den beiden Supraleitern diskrete Spannungswerte erzeugt, die nur von dem Quotienten zweier Naturkonstanten und der Frequenz f U n bei folgenden Werten auf: Dabei bedeuten n = 1, 2, 3, ... die Ordnung der Stufe, h das Plancksche Wirkungsquantum und e h e sondern der Kehrwert Josephson-Konstante K J genannt. K J-90 bezeichnet wird: K J-90 = 483 597,9 GHz/V

A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P  Q  R  S  T  U  V  W  X  Y  Z

61-80 of 106    Back | 1  | 2  | 3  | 4  | 5  | 6  | Next 20