81. Innovation From The Grassroots Up ø. jim October 23, 2007 @ 1110 am · Filed under. From a systems point of view, I am almost always interested in situations where executives or government http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/jim/

@import url( http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/jim/wp-content/themes/default/style.css ); Innovation from the grassroots up Innovation in America, people, process, public policy Illusions of control=dangerous jim More important, the mix of autocracy and democracy (invasion and occupation and elections) was so transparently wrong that it turned off both democratic and autocratic leaderes in the nation. And it frightened both democratic and autocratic governments around the region. Internally, this upset the delicate balance of forces that was keeping the country from melting down. In the region, it wrecked the balance that kept the middle east, if not peaceful and democratic, at least relatively stable. Finally, by persisting with this plan, the US lost all legitimacy everywhere, and with it the ability to influence anything. In my own experience this pattern is surprisingly common. Consider situations you are facing. Shame on you Senator Patrick Leahey jim American economic leadership Intellectual propery Innovation 1. What scares big companies is disruptive innovaton carried out by individuals and small firms. There are no scale effects in innovation. Bach, Mozart were individuals. Larry Ellison of Oracle famously says that software technology innovation can no longer be accomplished in large companies. This is why Oracle acquires companies right and left. Microsoft spends billions of dollars a year, and only comes up with incremental improvements. The same is broadly true in other fields. Most biotech innovation happens in universities or small labs. Even Apple, the famous innovator, is highly dependent on small outside design firms, and a few individuals carefully nurtured in the firm, for both look-and-feel and technology innovation.

82. Cygcyb.com Got New Host. cygcyb.com. http://www.cygcyb.com/

83. Rental Software And Convention Registration Services From Princeton Cybernetics Rental software that is easy to use, fullfeatured and affordably priced. Registration services include onsite and online registration. http://www.pcyber.net/

Our site has moved. We apologize for the inconvenience. For rental software, please go to RentControl For registration software, please go to ShowRunner Suite 159, 301 North Harrison Street Princeton, NJ 08540

84. Microchip Implants Our liberty is threatened Orwellianstyle by cybernetic technology that links the brains of people via implanted microchips to satellites controlled by http://www.naturodoc.com/library/public_health/microchip_implants.htm

Home NaturoDoc Library NaturoDoc Blog About Us ... Partners Microchip Implants, Mind Control, and Cybernetics By Rauni-Leena Luukanen-Kilde, MD Former Chief Medical Officer of Finland December 6, 2000 In 1948 Norbert Weiner published a book, Cybernetics , defined as a neurological communication and control theory already in use in small circles at that time. Yoneji Masuda, "Father of the Information Society," stated his concern in 1980 that our liberty is threatened Orwellian-style by cybernetic technology totally unknown to most people. This technology links the brains of people via implanted microchips to satellites controlled by ground-based supercomputers. The first brain implants were surgically inserted in 1974 in the state of Ohio, USA and also in Stockholm, Sweden. Brain electrodes were inserted into the skulls of babies in 1946 without the knowledge of their parents. In the 1950s and 60s, electrical implants were inserted into the brains of animals and humans, especially in the U.S., during research into behavior modification, and brain and body functioning. Mind control (MC) methods were used in attempts to change human behavior and attitudes. Influencing brain functions became an important goal of military and intelligence services. Thirty years ago brain implants showed up in X-rays the size of one centimeter. Subsequent implants shrunk to the size of a grain of rice. They were made of silicon, later still of gallium arsenide. Today they are small enough to be inserted into the neck or back, and also intravenously in different parts of the body during surgical operations, with or without the consent of the subject. It is now almost impossible to detect or remove them.

A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P  Q  R  S  T  U  V  W  X  Y  Z

Page 5     81-84 of 84    Back | 1  | 2  | 3  | 4  | 5