61. ISS: Letters To A Prestigious Science Journal brian D. josephson. (1) Good, IJ, Nature 389, 8067, 1997. Clarification theP-value discussed enters into the calculation of the so-called file-drawer http://www.survivalafterdeath.org/letters/radin.htm

LETTERS Dean Radin Letters to a Prestigious Science Journal Letter by Dean Radin sent to Nature magazine, January 17th, 1998 Dear Editor, I have heard that numerous people have gained an unfavorable impression of my book, "The Conscious Universe" (1997, HarperEdge), as a result of a review published in your journal on Oct. 23rd, p.806. Prof. I. J. Good's review involved factual errors, not merely differences in opinion, and I would like the journal to publish a correction in view of this. In his review (Oct. 23rd, p.806) of my book "The Conscious Universe" (1997, HarperEdge), I.J. Good suggests, based on certain misunderstandings on his part, that something "must be" wrong with my statistical arguments in favor of the reality of psychic phenomena. His inability to reproduce my estimate that 3,300 unpublished, unsuccessful experiments would be required for each published ESP card experiment (to nullify the cumulative outcome) follows from his incorrect assumption that my words "more than", used in connection with the cumulative odds against chance for the 186 experiments listed in Pratt et al (1966, "ESP after 60 years", as noted in my book), could safely be replaced by "approximately equal to." The actual p-value is approximately 10 , to which application of standard methods (Rosenthal, 1991, "Meta-analytic procedures for social research") gives my reported figure. Secondly, Good attributed to me an inaccurate statement actually made by the skeptical psychologist Mark Hansel. I am well aware that combining the statistical outcomes of experiments is not the same as combining the probabilities of independent events, but did not think it necessary to correct Hansel's mistake in a book aimed towards a general readership.

62. 161josephson2 brian D. josephson This talk mirrors Pathological Science , a lecture givenby Chemistry Laureate Irving Langmuir. Langmuir discussed cases where http://blake.montclair.edu/~kowalskil/cf/161josephson.html

Return to the clickable list of items 161) A set of messages about cold fusion Ludwik Kowalski (7/20/04) Department of Mathematical Sciences Montclair State University, Upper Montclair, NJ, 07043 This thread on PHYS-L, the Internet discussion list of physics teachers was triggered by this message from Teacher 1 (myself). Other contributors will be identified only as Teacher 2, Teacher 3, etc. Teacher 1: An interesting piece from Brian Josephson (Nobel prize in 1973 for the discovery of a superconducting electronic switch) about pseudoscience. www.lindau-nobel.de/images/ock/media/downloads/Media_1703187544.htm It is his lecture at the last annual meeting of Nobel winners in Landau, Germany. According to Haiko Lietz, a science reporter who attended the gathering: "the Lindau conference was very interesting, as one can imagine. Brian Josephson created a big stir. He spoke extensively on cold fusion, and how unscientific attitudes and a publication policy prohibited the field from becoming known in the scientific community. He was the talk of the day. Many students were asking him questions, they were open and interested. Reactions by the Nobel laureates were twofold: Some seemed to be surprised that cold fusion is still around, while others remained silent.” The immediate reply from Teacher 2 was: Earthshaking shaking claims require earthshaking evidence. Are you saying that such evidence is being suppressed and HAS been for lo these many years ? This stand wouldn't be giving the 'physics community' much credit. Has EVERYONE missed out on the shaking of the earth? How long was required for 'polywater' to become a lost cause?

63. Quantum Philosophy Theories brian D. josephson Biological Utilisation of Quantum NonLocality- 12)Prof.Ruth Kastner -Geometrical Phase Effects and Bohm’s Quantum Potential and TSQT http://www.qpt.org.uk/

Basic QM Copenhagen Interpretation Idealistic Theories Realistic Theories ... Entanglement and Time by Dr. A. Suarez (part 1) Quantum Philosophy Theories Academic web site. New service, mail to: authors.box@qpt.org.uk, it is possible send a public e-mail to the authors regarding information and papers online. Please go to Authors P.O. Box (Numered List). Papers online ( update 10 August)by: Prof.Clarke, Prof. Goldstein, Prof. Zanghi, Prof. Rovelli, Prof. Steane, Prof. Stapp, Prof.Smith, Prof.Chaitin, Prof.Cahill, Prof.Zurek, Prof.Goswami, Prof.W.M.de Muynck, Prof.Durr. Prof.Taylor, Prof. Tumulka

64. Quantum Dualism Ok? brian D. josephson and Fotini PallikariViras, Biological Utilisation of Quantum brian D. josephson, Beyond quantum theory a realist psycho-biological http://www.newdualism.org/quantum.htm

A philosophical archive for the constructive study of ontological dualism: www.newdualism.org Within Series Prior Site Map Is Orthodox Quantum Physics consonant with a Plausible Dualism? Introduction The problem of the relation between mind and body is well known as a difficult `world knot'. Over the centuries various monistic and dualistic theories have been proposed, and the subject has had renewed interest as we try to assimilate the implications of quantum physics. These implications may make us re-examine our views of brains and bodies, but it is still not clear what consequences they have for our understanding of minds. We may suspect that quantum mechanics and consciousness are related, but the details are not at all clear. More detail .. Essential Papers In context of Mind-Body Dualism: Henry Stapp home preprints proposes that minds select the times of probabilistic 'measurement' events, but not directly the probability outcomes: Mind, Matter and Quantum Mechanics 2nd ed, 2004 Why Classical Mechanics Cannot Naturally Accommodate Consciousness but Quantum Mechanics Can Quantum theory and the role of mind in nature ... cc For counter arguments to Stapp, see Matthew Donald

65. Dr.Tarek Said's Homepage-Nobel Prize Winners 1926 ARISTIDE brianD GUSTAV STRESEMANN 1973 Esaki, Leo Giaever, Ivar josephson, brian D. 1972 Bardeen, John Cooper, Leon, N. Schrieffer, http://www.geocities.com/tsaid3/nobel.html

Nobel Prize Winners Literature Peace Physics Medicine ... Nationalities Nobel Prize in Literature 2001 Sir V.S. Naipaul 2000 Gao Xingjian 1997 Dario Fo 1996 WISLAWA SZYMBORSKA 1995 SEAMUS HEANEY 1994 KENZABURO OE 1993 TONI MORRISON 1992 DEREK WALCOTT 1991 NADINE GORDIMER 1990 OCTAVIO PAZ 1989 CAMILO JOSE CELA NAGUIB MAHFOUZ 1987 JOSEPH BRODSKY 1986 WOLE SOYINKA 1985 CLAUDE SIMON 1984 JAROSLAV SEIFERT 1983 SIR WILLIAM GOLDING 1982 GABRIEL GARCIA MARQUEZ 1981 ELIAS CANETTI 1980 CZESLAW MILOSZ 1979 ODYSSEUS ELYTIS ( ODYSSEUS ALEPOUDHELIS ) 1978 ISAAC BASHEVIS SINGER 1977 VICENTE ALEIXANDRE 1976 SAUL BELLOW 1975 EUGENIO MONTALE 1973 PATRICK WHITE 1972 HEINRICH BALL 1971 PABLO NERUDA 1970 ALEKSANDR ISAEVICH SOLZHENITSYN 1969 SAMUEL BECKETT 1968 YASUNARI KAWABATA 1967 MIGUEL ANGEL ASTURIAS 1965 MICHAIL ALEKSANDROVICH SHOLOKHOV 1964 JEAN-PAUL SARTRE 1963 GIORGOS SEFERIS ( GIORGOS SEFERIADIS ) 1962 JOHN STEINBECK 1961 IVO ANDRIAC 1960 SAINT-JOHN PERSE ( ALEXIS LEGER ) 1959 SALVATORE QUASIMODO 1958 BORIS LEONIDOVICH PASTERNAK 1957 ALBERT CAMUS 1956 JUAN RAMON JIMENEZ 1955 HALLDER KILJAN LAXNESS 1954 ERNEST MILLER HEMINGWAY 1953 SIR WINSTON LEONARD SPENCER CHURCHILL 1951 PER FABIAN LAGERKVIST 1950 EARL BERTRAND ARTHUR WILLIAM RUSSELL 1949 WILLIAM FAULKNER 1948 THOMAS STEARNS ELIOT 1947 ANDRE PAUL GUILLAUME GIDE 1946 HERMANN HESSE 1945 GABRIELA MISTRAL ( LUCILA GODOY Y ALCA-YAGA ) 1944 JOHANNES VILHELM JENSEN 1943-1940 Main Fund and Special Fund of this prize section.

66. Parapsychology Jessica Utts and brian D. josephson, 1996. An assessment of the evidence forpsychic functioning brian D. josephson and Beverly A. Rubik, 1992 http://www.emergentmind.org/Arch8.htm

TABLE OF CONTENTS: "Signal Processing Analysis of Forced Choice ESP Data: Evidence for Psi as a Wave of Correlation" Norman S. Don, Bruce E McDonough, Charles A Warren "Extended Remote Viewing: an Overview for Distant Monitoring" Gene "Kincaid" Alternative biophysics: investing in the study of the biofield Savely Savva What can the paranormal teach us about consciousness? Susan Blackmore A wrinkle in time? Psi, "backward causation" and synchronicity Christian de Quincey The challenge of synchronicity: its meaning and implications for science and philosophy Christian de Quincey On the Possible Mechanism of Intent in Paranormal Phenomena Lian G. Sidorov Experimental Evidence Suggestive of Anomalous Consciousness Interactions Deborah L. Delanoy What We Know About Remote Viewing From Miracles of Mind by Russell Targ and Jane Katra Project Tesla: Wireless Transmission of Power (Resonating Planet Earth) Toby Grotz The Roots of Consciousness (The Biological Perspective) Jeffrey Mishlove, PhD An Anomalous Cognition Protocol Employing Fuzzy-Set Theory to Accelerate Breakthroughs in Disease Process Research by Stephan A. Schwartz, S. James P. Spottiswoode, Edwin C. May and Jessica Utts

67. Norwegian Inventions, Discoveries And Awards josephson, brian D., Great Britain, Cambridge University, Cambridge, (1940) forhis theoretical predictions of the properties of a supercurrent through a http://www.cyberclip.com/Katrine/NorwayInfo/NorgeInv.html

Norwegian Inventions, Discoveries and Awards Norwegian Inventions, Discoveries and Awards Discoveries Inventions Awards Discoveries * Greenland Eiríkr raudi (Eirik the Red) emigrated from Jæren in Norway to Iceland in 981 or 982 in search of a new land. The reason for his departure was apparently some unexplained local murders. From Iceland, Eirik made lots of travels, and on one of them found Greenland, which was soon colonized. But it was his son, Leif, who was going to make the biggest discovery... (see below) * America The Icelandic born Leif Eirikson, son of Eirik the Red (see above), followed in his father's footsteps and discovered more new land: He found a land he called Helluland (Flatstone Land, probably Baffin Island), then he sailed to Markland (Forest Land, Labrador), and from there to Vinland . The account of his voyage is preserved in Gronlendinga saga. Eiriks saga rauda has a different version: according to this, Leif put out to sea from Norway, in order to sail home to Greenland; he was driven off course, and came to an unknown land where he found self-sown wheat and vine trees. A new expedition, led by Toifinnr Karlsefni, set out for this new land, and in connection with his expedition, the saga calls the land Vinland. Traditions, it will be seen, differ, but they agree that a new land far west in the Atlantic had been discovered. The year is about A.D. 1000.

68. Superconductor History brian josephson. Another significant theoretical advancement came in 1962 whenbrian D. josephson (above), a graduate student at Cambridge University, http://superconductors.org/History.htm

VISITOR ALERT: We have detected that your browser is not Java-enabled. Please enable Java and Java Script by clicking on your Browser's "PREFERENCES" area. If you don't not wish to enable Java, you will not be able to view all of the information available on this website. Java is used extensively. T h e H i s t o r y o f S u p e r c o n d u c t o r s Superconductors , materials that have no resistance to the flow of electricity, are one of the last great frontiers of scientific discovery. Not only have the limits of superconductivity not yet been reached, but the theories that explain superconductor behavior seem to be constantly under review. In 1911 superconductivity was first observed in mercury by Dutch physicist Heike Kamerlingh Onnes of Leiden University (shown above). When he cooled it to the temperature of liquid helium, 4 degrees Kelvin (-452F, -269C), its resistance suddenly disappeared. The Kelvin scale represents an "absolute" scale of temperature. Thus, it was necessary for Onnes to come within 4 degrees of the coldest temperature that is theoretically attainable to witness the phenomenon of superconductivity. Later, in 1913, he won a Nobel Prize in physics for his research in this area. Walter Meissner The next great milestone in understanding how matter behaves at extreme cold temperatures occurred in 1933. German researchers Walter Meissner (above) and Robert Ochsenfeld discovered that a superconducting material will repel a magnetic field (below graphic). A magnet moving by a conductor induces currents in the conductor. This is the principle upon which the electric generator operates. But, in a superconductor the induced currents exactly mirror the field that would have otherwise penetrated the superconducting material - causing the magnet to be repulsed. This phenomenon is known as strong diamagnetism and is today often referred to as the "Meissner effect" (an eponym). The Meissner effect is so strong that a magnet can actually be

69. Www.globalresearch.ca :: View Topic - PROOF THE TWIN TOWERS WERE DELIBERATELY DE winner brian D. josephson, who teaches physics at the University of brian D.josephson This talk mirrors Pathological Science , a lecture http://globalresearch.ca.myforums.net/viewtopic.php?t=353

70. Nobel Prize Winner Accuses brian D. josephson, Department of Physics, University of Cambridge.http//www.tcm.phy.cam.ac.uk/~bdj10. This talk mirrors Pathological Science , http://physics.nad.ru/engboard/messages/1366.html

Nobel Prize Winner accuses Post a Followup Physics Forum Rules ][ Theme ] Message 1366 from Starley, 26 June 2004 Prof Brian Josephson has been a member of the TCM group, Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge, since the 1960's. While he was a graduate student he predicted the so-called Josephson effects, for which he was awarded the physics Nobel prize in 1973. His current interests include the organisation of brain function, and relationships between mind and physical reality. Pathological Disbelief Summary of lecture by Brian D. Josephson, Department of Physics, University of Cambridge http://www.tcm.phy.cam.ac.uk/~bdj10 Other popular forms of attack are "if X were true we would have to start over again" (as we of course had to do with Relativity and Quantum Theory, and so the argument proves nothing), and then there is the dictum "Extraordinary Claims require Extraordinary Evidence", which has the marvellous feature of allowing the requirements for acceptable proof to be stretched indefinitely as more and more support for a contested claim comes in. Its originator, the late Marcello Truzzi, later decided that his comment was 'a non sequitur, meaningless and question-begging', and had planned to write a debunking of his own creation (5). Ref. 6 takes a light-hearted look at a range of strategies used by critics. In an attempt to promote proper discussion of the issue, I tried in 2002 to upload a survey by Storms (7) to, the preprint server arxiv.org, the natural place for facilitating such discussion, but the moderators frustrated this intent by deleting the review, declaring it "inappropriate" (chemists, being a more robust species than physicists, were permitted to see it on their own server chemweb.com). A breath of fresh air has been introduced into the situation now, with the recent decision of the US Department of Energy to review the research (8); if the reviewers simply look at some of the research going on they will almost inevitably conclude that fusion can take place at ordinary temperatures, with a yield far in excess of the 'almost undetectable level' referred to in Langmuir's lecture.

71. Star Drive Discussion Group Nobel Physics Laureate brian josephson defends paranormal. Thu Aug 4, 2005 0756.198.129.219.178 brian D. josephson bdj10@cam.ac.uk http://disc.server.com/discussion.cgi?disc=68326;article=1900;title=Star Drive D

72. Stardrive.org - - Tucson III Update Page brian D. josephson bdj10@cam.ac.uk * MindMatter * Cavendish Lab., MadingleyRd, Cambridge CB3 0HE, UK * Unification * voice +44(0)1223 http://www.stardrive.org/tucson3.shtml

Jack Sarfatti Reports from Tucson III: Toward a Science of Consciousness April 27 - May 2, 1998 Our intrepid doktor-reporter, Jack Sarfatti, along with Fred Wolf, reports from the 3rd Tucson conference on consciousness, sponsored by the consciousness studies program at the University of Arizona . Click the date to read the report. April 27 April 28 April 29 April 30 ... May 2 Jack and Basil Hiley, of Bohm and Hiley fame April 27, 1998 Notes Jack: I am not wasting my time at the Plenaries, instead I wrote the following. The concurrent sessions and the poster sessions are more interesting in general except for Hiley''s plenary talk on Friday. Tucson 3 Notes II. Bohm and Hiley characterize the quantum active information of the quantum potential Q on the system point P (e.g. set of particles, classical gauge field configurations on a spacelike surface, or any combination of the latter two) as "rudimentary mindlike". Kieseppa argues that the "mindlike" characterization is not warranted for two definite reasons. First Q has no sources. This implies a kind of covariance of possible representations that destroys the claim of "form dependence". Second, the Bohm quantum non- mechanics of Q -> P is deterministic even though placing the system point P in a desired place in the Q-field is "uncontrollable". That is we cannot control the initial condition for the deterministic motion of P in its configuration space. However, my extension of the Bohm nonmechanics (Hiley prefers use of "nonmechanics" to "mechanics") evades both of Kieseppa's objections. That is, his objections become arguments for my Q*

73. Casys2005 brian D. josephson, Nobel Prize in Physics, Cambridge University (UK). Prof.John Horton Conway, Finite Mathematics, Princeton University (USA) http://www.ulg.ac.be/mathgen/CHAOS/CASYS2005.htm

CALL FOR PAPERS – CASYS ’05 - International Conference on COMPUTING ANTICIPATORY SYSTEMS – LIEGE, Belgium, August 8-13, 2005 at HEC-ULg – organized by asbl CHAOS - INVITED SPEAKERS: Brian D. Josephson, Nobel Prize in Physics – John Horton Conway - Mitchell J. Feigenbaum If the MENUS do not appear click here – Up-dated on AUGUST 2, 2005 – Seventh International Conference on Computing Anticipatory Systems Liège, Belgium, August 8-13, 2005 To be held at HEC Management School - University of Liege 14 rue Louvrex, B-4000 Liège, Belgium Organized by ASBL CHAOS, Centre for Hyperincursion and Anticipation in Ordered Systems, Tel. : + 32 (0)4 366 00 28 Mobile: +32(0)4 95 510 419 Fax: + 32 (0)4 366 94 89 http://www.ulg.ac.be/mathgen/CHAOS Daniel.Dubois@ulg.ac.be President: Prof. Daniel M. Dubois , HEC Management School - University of Liege (Belgium) Vice-President: Prof. Adel F. Antippa , Physique, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières (Canada) Invited Speakers: Prof. Brian D. Josephson Nobel Prize in Physics Cambridge University (UK) Prof. John Horton Conway

74. SIMO - Società Italiana Di Medicina Omeopatica - Notizie brian D. josephson University of Cambridge. Invia per email http://www.omeomed.net/news/fullnews.php?id=43

75. Society For Scientific Exploration: Articles The Paranormal The Evidence and Its Implications for Consciousness Utts, Jessica josephson, brian D. Academic Programs Related Courses Internships http://www.scientificexploration.org/yi/articles.php

Recommended Reading: Online Articles Consciousness and Anomalous Physical Phenomena Science of the Subjective and other articles Amplified Mind Power Research In The Former Soviet Union Ebon, Martin The Case for the Extraterrestrial Origin of Flying Saucers and related UFO articles Friedman, Stanton Inertial Mass and the Quantum Vacuum Fields and other articles on inertia the zero-point field Haisch, Bernard, et al. The American Institutes for Research Review of the Department of Defense's STAR GATE Program: A Commentary May, Edwin CIA-Initiated Remote Viewing At Stanford Research Institute Puthoff, H. E. Anomalous Cognition Effect Size: Dependence on Sidereal Time and Solar Wind Parameters and other articles Curious, Creative, and Critical Thinking Sturrock, Peter Physical Evidence Related to UFO Reports Sturrock, P., Eshleman, V., Holzer, T., Jokipii, R., Louange, F., Melosh, H., Papike, J., Reitz, G., Tolbert, C., Veyret, B. et al. Remote Viewing: The Real Story Swann, Ingo

76. Active Skim View Of: 12 Two Nobels Are Better Than One Hole In One In 1962 brian josephson, a 23year-old graduate student of brian Pippard, particularly when one or both are superconducting, and brian D http://www.nap.edu/nap-cgi/skimit.cgi?isbn=0309084083&chap=219-240

77. SCIENCE EVENTS The josephson effect, a quantum phenomenon, was largely formulated by the NobelPrize Laureates brian D. josephson and Philip W. Anderson. http://funphysics.jpl.nasa.gov/technical/library/sig-events-03/sig030214-science

SIGNIFICANT EVENTS - SCIENCE EVENTS JPL Group Publishes Ideas on Observing Josephson Effects Near the Lambda Transition The "Fluctuations of the Phase Difference across an Array of Josephson Junctions in Superfluid He near the Lambda Transition." by Talso Chui, Warren Holmes and Konstantin Penanen has been accepted for publication by the Physical Review Letters. The Josephson effect, a quantum phenomenon, was largely formulated by the Nobel Prize Laureates Brian D. Josephson and Philip W. Anderson. This phenomenon in superconductors is the basis of the Superconducting QUantum Interference Device (SQUID). Using SQUIDs, researchers have made the most sensitive measurements of magnetic field, temperature, displacement and pressure. This paper is a theory of thermal noise in Josephson junctions, which is applied to the case of an array of superfluid helium weak links. We explain why the Josephson effect is observable in an array of weak links in superfluid He, and not in a single link. This theory is applicable to the design of ultra-sensitive gyroscopes for ground and space based applications.

78. ノーベル物理学賞 - ブライアãƒ� Translate this page The summary for this Japanese page contains characters that cannot be correctly displayed in this language/character set. http://www.nobelpreis.org/japanese/physik/josephson.htm

ブライアン・D・ジョセフソン (Brian David Josephson)

79. Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB) In 1962, the 22year-old British student brian D. josephson predicted two effectswhich could experimentally verified shortly afterwards. http://www.ptb.de/en/org/2/Inhalte/Josephson/josephson.htm

PTB Structure Division 2 Department 2.1 ... Deutsche Version Josephson Effects and Josephson Voltage Standards In 1962, the 22-year-old British student Brian D. Josephson predicted two effects which could experimentally verified shortly afterwards. The modern Josephson voltage standard is based on one of these effects. The Josephson effects occur if two superconductors are weakly coupled, e.g. by separating them by an insulating layer of a few nanometer in thickness. Irradiation of this Josephson junction with microwaves (being an electromagnetic wave) creates between the superconductors discrete voltage levels depending only on the ratio of two fundamental constants and the frequency f of the microwaves. These steps of constant voltage are generated at voltages V n n = 1, 2, 3, ... denotes the number of the steps, h the Planck constant and e the elementary charge. The term Josephson constant K J is nowadays used for the quotient 2 e h instead of its reciprocal value for historical reasons. By means of Josephson junctions, voltages can be reproduced with relative uncertainties of less than one part in ten billion (1 : 10 , i.e. 1 nV at 10 V). The Josephson effect is therefore world-wide used as a basis for constant reference voltages in metrological national institutes and in calibration laboratories of industry. As the Josephson constant is not known with the needed accuracy, the same agreed value is used everywhere for these purposes, which is named

80. Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB) Translate this page Im Jahre 1962 sagte der damals 22jährige britische Student brian D. josephson zweiEffekte voraus, die kurz darauf experimentell bestätigt werden konnten. http://www.ptb.de/de/org/2/Inhalte/Josephson/josephson.htm

PTB Struktur Abteilung 2 Fachbereich 2.1 ... English Version Josephson-Effekte und Josephson-Spannungsnormal Die Josephson-Effekte treten auf, wenn zwei Supraleiter schwach gekoppelt sind, indem sie z.B. durch eine isolierende Schicht von wenigen Nanometern getrennt sind. Wird auf ein derartiges Josephson-Element eine Mikrowelle (eine elektro-magnetische Schwingung) eingestrahlt, werden zwischen den beiden Supraleitern diskrete Spannungswerte erzeugt, die nur von dem Quotienten zweier Naturkonstanten und der Frequenz f U n bei folgenden Werten auf: Dabei bedeuten n = 1, 2, 3, ... die Ordnung der Stufe, h das Plancksche Wirkungsquantum und e h e sondern der Kehrwert Josephson-Konstante K J genannt. K J-90 bezeichnet wird: K J-90 = 483 597,9 GHz/V Originalarbeit von B.D. Josephson B.D. Josephson, "Possible new effects in superconductive tunnelling", Phys. Lett. J. Niemeyer, "Josephson voltage standards", in: Handbook of Applied Superconductivity, B. Seeber (Ed.), Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol (1998) 1813-1834. J. Niemeyer, "Das Josephsonspannungsnormal - Entwicklung zum Quantenvoltmeter", PTB-Mitteilungen

A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P  Q  R  S  T  U  V  W  X  Y  Z

Page 4     61-80 of 106    Back | 1  | 2  | 3  | 4  | 5  | 6  | Next 20